PDA

View Full Version : Another interview with Duquette



ChaosLex
01-08-2012, 12:24 AM
Didn't see this posted yet...


When you were introduced, you mentioned that you wanted this team to be a .500 team in 2012.

Well, we want to get back to winning. We want to break out of the rut. We want to be back to winning more than we lose. That's the first step.


Do you think you've made enough moves here to make a .500 team?

Not yet. We're still working on it. We've still got some work to do. But I think some of the additions we've made are incrementally additive.


When it comes to the closer role, are you comfortable with the pitchers you have right now for that spot, or is it a place where you see that an upgrade is necessary?

We need to build our pitching staff, but we need to build the innings with our starting pitching first. Once we do that reasonably well, I think we'll look at a closer. We have a little more depth to our staff, but like any good pitching staff, you need to have a thousand innings going into the season. If you look at the left-handers we've picked up, they've pitched closed to 200 innings. [Tsuyoshi] Wada pitched 205 innings [in Japan], counting the playoffs. [Dana] Eveland pitched 185. We're working on conditioning programs for the other pitchers so they can withstand the stresses of major league pitching. We're working on that but have some options at closer that I think Buck [Showalter] can figure out in spring training.


Like you mentioned, some of those young pitchers have struggled to stay healthy. Is as simple as conditioning?

I think it's a part of it. It's managing the pitching staff very concisely. Part of it is the recovery between starts, the throwing program, the maintenance. I think those are all factors. We're addressing all those things. If we're going to stabilize the team, we've got to stabilize the pitching staff.


Even though a lot of the fans would rather have Prince Fielder, right?

Well, who doesn't, right? (Laughs)


What about the situation at second base? Right now, you really don't know what you're going to get out of Brian Roberts.

If he's ready, that's great. If Roberts is not ready, we've got some other guys who are professionals who can do a good job. We've got [Robert] Andino, the kid [Ryan] Flaherty we picked up, we have [Matt] Antonelli. We have this other kid, Ryan Adams, who is a pretty good hitter. So we have four potential options there. There's a little bit of depth there.


A blast from your past, Manny Ramirez, is supposed to work out for teams this month. Can we expect the Orioles to be at that workout?

Manny? Manny is an interesting guy. He's trying hard to make a comeback.


But would you be interested in seeing his workout?

Manny's an interesting guy. He's interesting to the fans. And he can hit. Or he could hit. I don't know if he still can. But he's working hard on getting a second chance. [According to a report by ESPNDeportes.com, the Orioles recently watched Ramirez hit in a batting cage.]

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/bal-qa-with-dan-duquette-20120107,0,6977969.story?page=2

Sports Guy
01-08-2012, 12:39 AM
Delete this thread! :D

24fps
01-08-2012, 01:25 AM
"Incrementally additive" is my new favorite buzz phrase.

I think his comments on managing the pitching staff are incrementally additive to the hot stove debate this off season. Expressing even the slightest interest in Manny Ramierez not so much.

Frobby
01-08-2012, 05:02 PM
I think the telling quote was:


Do you think you've made enough moves here to make a .500 team?

Not yet. We're still working on it. We've still got some work to do. But I think some of the additions we've made are incrementally additive.

weams
01-08-2012, 05:05 PM
I think the telling quote was:

Yes, very ture.

Roy Firestone
01-08-2012, 05:08 PM
I think the telling quote was:

On the fans wanting Prince Fielder.."who doesnt"? That to me is far more interesting.
He couldve said "Prince is an 'interesting guy' and left it at that.He didnt.
Dont you love me reading into nothing and trying to breathe life into it?

SammyBirdland
01-08-2012, 05:11 PM
I think the telling quote was:

I certainly appreciate his honesty.

weams
01-08-2012, 05:15 PM
On the fans wanting Prince Fielder.."who doesnt"? That to me is far more interesting.
He couldve said "Prince is an 'interesting guy' and left it at that.He didnt.
Dont you love me reading into nothing and trying to breathe life into it?

Keep fanning the flame. Never let it die.

oriole
01-08-2012, 05:31 PM
I think the telling quote was:

Most definitely...I don't think this a .500 team and its good to know Duquette doesn't either. This may have been a boring offseason so far but more interesting moves are on the horizon, I believe. Maybe not blockbuster Jones trades and fat first basemen signings, but interesting nonetheless.

scOtt
01-08-2012, 05:42 PM
I think the telling quote was:

I think this is pretty interesting... from 2 questions.


We're working on conditioning programs for the other pitchers so they can withstand the stresses of major league pitching.

...

Is as simple as conditioning?

I think it's a part of it. It's managing the pitching staff very concisely. Part of it is the recovery between starts, the throwing program, the maintenance. I think those are all factors. We're addressing all those things. If we're going to stabilize the team, we've got to stabilize the pitching staff.

Sounds like Correnti to me. I'm hopeful that he can help our pitchers reach their potential. Sounds very cutting edge and proactive.

rochester
01-08-2012, 06:06 PM
"Incrementally additive" is my new favorite buzz phrase.

I think his comments on managing the pitching staff are incrementally additive to the hot stove debate this off season. Expressing even the slightest interest in Manny Ramierez not so much.

Sounds like something you are supposed to put on food but not all at once...say "Can you pass me the additive? I am not sure I want it so I'll put it on incrementally."

El Gordo
01-08-2012, 07:52 PM
I found this interesting:
"We need to build our pitching staff, but we need to build the innings with our starting pitching first. Once we do that reasonably well, I think we'll look at a closer. We have a little more depth to our staff, but like any good pitching staff, you need to have a thousand innings going into the season."
Looks like Matusz and Tillman start out in Norfolk unless they are phenomenal in ST. At least they'll be together again. :hearts:

Boston Dave
01-09-2012, 11:37 AM
On the fans wanting Prince Fielder.."who doesnt"? That to me is far more interesting.
He couldve said "Prince is an 'interesting guy' and left it at that.He didnt.
Dont you love me reading into nothing and trying to breathe life into it?

I do love it- a lot. Thanks for any optimism you or anyone can breathe into this off-season.
And bottom line- I think Os are willing to pay- big- for Prince. But they have a firm line on how much that is, and will not cross it. If he falls to them, great. He doesn't? Fine too. And as boring as that is, I think it's a prudent stance. (Like how I interpret so much into nothing, too??? LOL)

srock
01-09-2012, 11:42 AM
Manny?

MANNY!?!!?!?!?

Don't talk about Manny!?!?!?

.500_OR_BETTER
01-09-2012, 12:15 PM
What about the 3-year plan!?

Dipper9
01-09-2012, 12:25 PM
I do love it- a lot. Thanks for any optimism you or anyone can breathe into this off-season.
And bottom line- I think Os are willing to pay- big- for Prince. But they have a firm line on how much that is, and will not cross it. If he falls to them, great. He doesn't? Fine too. And as boring as that is, I think it's a prudent stance. (Like how I interpret so much into nothing, too??? LOL)

I agree. I want a snow-blower, and have had my eye on it on Amazon for the past few weeks. But my dad bought the same one in December for much less, so I am waiting for it to come back down. I want it, badly, but I have my limit as to how much I'll spend when I can do the job fairly well by hand.

I think the O's are in the same spot. They will spend big for Fielder, but if he doesn't meet their price tag, well, then Reynolds or Davis can do the job "reasonably well" as backup options.

.500_OR_BETTER
01-09-2012, 12:38 PM
I agree. I want a snow-blower, and have had my eye on it on Amazon for the past few weeks. But my dad bought the same one in December for much less, so I am waiting for it to come back down. I want it, badly, but I have my limit as to how much I'll spend when I can do the job fairly well by hand.

Stick with the shovel old man.


I think the O's are in the same spot. They will spend big for Fielder, but if he doesn't meet their price tag, well, then Reynolds or Davis can do the job "reasonably well" as backup options.

I am all for Reynolds and Fielder oppose to Davis and Reynolds. One screams power and the other screams strikeouts.