View Full Version : Dodgers win despite being no-hit.
Lester Freamon
06-29-2008, 12:47 AM
A very rare feat.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2008_06_28_anamlb_lanmlb_1&mode=gameday
RShack
06-29-2008, 12:53 AM
Wow.
It's even rarer when you score a run and *still* lose a no-hitter: http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL196704301.shtml
Lester Freamon
06-29-2008, 01:09 AM
Wow.
It's even rarer when you score a run and *still* lose a no-hitter: http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL196704301.shtml
Aw man, that is one heck of a box score you posted shack. Barber, looks to have come within one out of completing the game. 10 walks (one intentional), 2 wild pitches and 2 hit batters, 2 runs (1 earned), 3 K's and no hits.
great stuff.
ledzepp8
06-29-2008, 02:09 AM
And it technically wasn't a "no hitter".
Lester Freamon
06-29-2008, 03:13 AM
And it technically wasn't a "no hitter".
True. The Angels needed to pitch nine innings for it to be a no-hitter (just saw that on Sports Center). I guess the title of the thread should be "Dodgers win without getting a hit".
ledzepp8
06-29-2008, 12:37 PM
True. The Angels needed to pitch nine innings for it to be a no-hitter (just saw that on Sports Center). I guess the title of the thread should be "Dodgers win without getting a hit".
Yeah I think it's kind of silly how that's not considered a no hitter. It would still be considered a complete game wouldn't it?:scratchchinhmm:
RShack
06-29-2008, 02:25 PM
Yeah I think it's kind of silly how that's not considered a no hitter. It would still be considered a complete game wouldn't it?:scratchchinhmm:
I think so.
Regardless, IMO not giving a guy a no-hitter for that is wrong. He faced everybody the other team sent up to the plate... although it was 2 guys, but still...