PDA

View Full Version : 10 Things I Hate About College Football



Birds of B'more
03-02-2009, 04:19 AM
Let me start by saying that I love college football. Nothing beats Saturdays in the fall for me; whether I'm tailgating in a parking lot before/after watching a game in person, or at home in my easy chair with the satellite and HDTV. But I stumbled across this on ESPN.com (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/columns/story?columnist=schlabach_mark&id=3932776) and thought I'd share it in case anyone missed it. I wholeheartedly agree with 7 of the 10 points Mark Schlabach makes. I made notes below the three I disagree with (and only slightly disagree at that).


1. The BCS: It's too easy a choice, but I, like many college football fans out there, would rather see the national championship settled on the playing field. If the BCS couldn't give me Texas playing Florida for the BCS national championship last season, at least give me the Longhorns playing Southern California in the Rose Bowl. I would have preferred to see Georgia play USC in the 2008 Rose Bowl, instead of watching the Bulldogs rout overmatched Hawaii in the Sugar Bowl, and USC pounding another Big Ten team in Pasadena. I'm not saying college football needs a full-blown playoff, but a plus-one system would at least be a start. No, college football does need a full blown playoff. But if we are going to be stuck with the BCS, then Schlabach is right. The system needs to be tweaked to create better matchups and add the "plus-one."

2. National signing day: College football programs pampering high school recruits with fine meals, fancy hotel rooms and pretty "hostesses" is bad enough. Isn't a free college tuition enough incentive? But why is an 18-year-old high school player's college choice national news? Recruiting services have turned into a multi-million-dollar cottage industry, and their unscientific rankings put unnecessary expectations on incoming freshman. A few five-star recruits turn out to be star players in their first seasons and later become All-Americans. But too many players never realize their lofty potential, and are widely considered "busts" before they turn 21. Next thing we know, college football recruiting will be as bad as the seedy world of college basketball recruiting. I'd gladly start each February without seeing an 18-year-old kid choose from among five hats.

3. Celebration restrictions: College presidents and conference commissioners consistently tell us they don't want a playoff because they want college football's regular season to matter more than those of any other sport. So with so much on the line each and every Saturday in the fall, can we really blame players for being really excited to play in those games? I don't want wide receivers dancing in the end zone and pulling off scripted celebrations like those in the NFL. But I want players to be jumping for joy after scoring touchdowns and sacking quarterbacks. Now the NCAA football rules committee wants coaches to weigh turning dead-ball celebration penalties into live-ball fouls, which would actually take points off the scoreboard. I'd love to see that game official make it out of town.

4. Nonconference schedules: Thank goodness for neutral-site games like Virginia Tech playing Alabama in Atlanta, and BYU playing Oklahoma in Dallas. If not, the first two or three weeks of the season would include nothing more than college football powers playing FCS opponents and other overmatched teams. I hate that more SEC schools won't play north of the Mason-Dixon Line, which would finally settle the SEC vs. Big Ten debate. I hate that we can't see more Big 12 defenses playing SEC offenses, and vice versa. I hate that more BCS teams don't have the guts to play at places like BYU, Boise State and Utah. I wish there were more programs willing to play anyone, anywhere, anytime.

5. Conference alignments: I hate the divisional alignments of some of college football's best conferences. I wish the ACC, Big 12 and the SEC would go back to the drawing board and remap their divisions. I wish Florida, Georgia and Tennessee didn't all play in the SEC East. I wish Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech didn't all play in the Big 12 South. I wish Boston College, Miami and Virginia Tech still played in the Big East, which isn't nearly as good without them. I wish Notre Dame played in the Big Ten. I wish Boise State and Utah played in the Pac-10, so USC would be tested more than once or twice every season.

6. Conference championship games: If the ACC, Big 12 and SEC are going to play conference championship games at the end of each regular season, the Big East, Big Ten and Pac-10 need to do the same. Obviously, the Big East would have to add at least two schools and the Big Ten would need one more to balance its divisions. But if teams like Alabama, Florida and Oklahoma are going to put their BCS chances on the line in a 13th game, then it's not fair that schools such as Michigan, Ohio State and USC don't do the same. There are risks and rewards to playing in a conference championship game, but it's not fair that teams watching at home can benefit even more. I'd prefer to see the conference championships done away with altogether. If you want one more week of TV money, then just add a 13th game for every team. And if you do a 13th game, then force the conferences that don't already play a full round-robin to make that extra game a conference game.

7. Lack of head coaching diversity: I hate that capable African-American coaches like Buffalo's Turner Gill aren't given a fair chance to lead a great BCS program. I hate that Florida defensive coordinator Charlie Strong, another African-American, can't get any head-coaching job. I hate that other African-American coaches are judged by the failures of coaches like Ron Prince and Tyrone Willingham. College football's lack of diversity in its coaching ranks is its biggest black eye. Sadly, the sport has done very little to try to correct it.

8. The bowl season: There's nothing wrong with playing 32 bowl games. It gives me something to do once the regular season ends. But more than anything else, I miss New Year's Day meaning more than any other day of the year. I miss waking up on the first day of the year to the Cotton Bowl and going to bed with the Orange Bowl. I miss watching the most meaningful bowl games on one day, and knowing at the end which team is college football's national champion. I hate having to wait an extra day for the Sugar Bowl and four days for the Fiesta Bowl. I especially hate having to wait another week for the BCS National Championship Game.

9. The death of radio: Cable TV helps to pay my bills, but I hate that I don't listen to college football games on the radio anymore. I miss getting into my car for a road trip on Saturday and listening to the iconic radio voices of long ago. I miss hearing the legendary voices of Larry Munson, John Ward, Jim Phillips, Jim Fyffe, John Ferguson and Al Ciraldo. I love being able to watch as many games as I want on TV on seemingly any day of the week, but I still believe there's nothing better than having the game described to you by a very good radio play-by-play announcer. There are still some very good radio voices out there, but the game still doesn't sound as clear anymore -- even when you're listening to satellite radio. I have to confess that I've never heard of any of the radio announcers he mentions. Football on the radio just doesn't work for me like baseball does.

10. Cookie-cutter coaches: I hate that there aren't more coaches like Texas Tech's Mike Leach, who is way too smart for his profession (and probably his own good). I hate that more coaches won't show their true colors (unless, of course, it's Oklahoma State's Mike Gundy). I hate that too many coaches are too paranoid to reveal their personalities and are too consumed by the task at hand. I hate that more coaches don't like pirates and Geronimo. I hate that there aren't more colorful coaches in college football. At least we have Tennessee's Lane Kiffin now -- that will be fun to watch.

ledzepp8
03-02-2009, 09:06 PM
6. Conference championship games: If the ACC, Big 12 and SEC are going to play conference championship games at the end of each regular season, the Big East, Big Ten and Pac-10 need to do the same. Obviously, the Big East would have to add at least two schools and the Big Ten would need one more to balance its divisions. But if teams like Alabama, Florida and Oklahoma are going to put their BCS chances on the line in a 13th game, then it's not fair that schools such as Michigan, Ohio State and USC don't do the same. There are risks and rewards to playing in a conference championship game, but it's not fair that teams watching at home can benefit even more. I'd prefer to see the conference championships done away with altogether. If you want one more week of TV money, then just add a 13th game for every team. And if you do a 13th game, then force the conferences that don't already play a full round-robin to make that extra game a conference game.
I don't get what his point is here. Is he saying the Big East, Big Ten and Pac-10 should be forced to play a conference championship game because those other conferences chose to have a conference championship game?

Birds of B'more
03-02-2009, 09:54 PM
I don't get what his point is here. Is he saying the Big East, Big Ten and Pac-10 should be forced to play a conference championship game because those other conferences chose to have a conference championship game?

That's how it reads, but I think his point is more that the players on the teams in the non-championship game conferences have the easier path because they don't have to jump that one last hurdle. I don't feel bad at all for the big-wigs in the conferences and schools that do play those games......they do it for the revenues and that's that. But it's the players have to put their chance to play for a national championship on the line in order to earn that money.....and that part seems a bit unfair. Of course I guess said players could just avoid going to ACC/Big 12/SEC schools. But my preference would be to eliminate those games and give every school a 13th game.....with the stipulation that I mentioned already.


And if you do a 13th game, then force the conferences that don't already play a full round-robin to make that extra game a conference game.

geschinger
03-02-2009, 10:04 PM
One thing College Football should do is reduce conference size. The SEC, B12 and ACC are too big. Noone should get an easy road to a conference championship based on a schedule. Conferences should be sized at the point where every team in the conference can play every other team in the conference. The divisional BS and conference championship games is nothing more than putting revenue ahead of what is best for the sport.

Birds of B'more
03-03-2009, 02:57 AM
One thing College Football should do is reduce conference size. The SEC, B12 and ACC are too big. Noone should get an easy road to a conference championship based on a schedule. Conferences should be sized at the point where every team in the conference can play every other team in the conference. The divisional BS and conference championship games is nothing more than putting revenue ahead of what is best for the sport.

I don't think you'll ever see that happen. The big conferences believe there is strength in numbers. And when it comes to revenues, they're probably right. I wish there was some sort of governing body in college football that could just force all of the conferences to play a round-robin.....that means the schools in the three super-conferences would only get one OOC game per season. That way instead of as many as 3 or 4 ridiculous matchups against weak opponents for a guaranteed win (although that "guarantee" has become less ironclad than it was before) those schools would only get one OOC game per season. Basically, if you want to have a super conference, then that's fine.....but you all have to play each other every season.

But sadly it's pretty much a case of the inmates running the asylum in college football.

Balmer Bomber
03-03-2009, 05:28 AM
I'm not sure how many people know this, but the only reason the Pac-10 allowed their schools to add the 12th game was if they agreed to play a true round robin in the conference.

Mitch Connor
03-06-2009, 01:55 PM
I would like to see some Bowl Games played in cold weather stadiums, in cities like Chicago, Baltimore, New York, Boston, Philadephia and Pittsburgh. I'm a Penn State fan and watch alot of Big 10 football. Most of the teams in that league are built on strong ground games and defense, in part because of playing in cold weather. Yet teams, in the SEC play in warmer weather and then are rewarded, by playing their Bowl Games down south, in warm weather stadiums or domes. Lets even the playing field and make them travel up north and maybe play a January game, in the snow. I don't think they would be as dominant, as in recent years.

Back to smash mouth football, the way it was meant to be!

RShack
05-01-2009, 02:22 AM
I don't think you'll ever see that happen. The big conferences believe there is strength in numbers. And when it comes to revenues, they're probably right.
It hasn't always been that way, it keeps changing. First, in ancient times, the Southern Conference was huge, with a bunch of teams who *never* played each other, not even once. Then the SEC split off. Then the ACC split off. Then, because of how the TV money worked, it became advantageous to be independents. So schools like GT and S.Car. left conferences to become independents so they wouldn't have to share their TV money with anybody. Then, TV money got increasingly tied to conferences. So, schools like GT and SC re-joined conferences (but different ones).

Conferences got bigger because everybody thought we'd wind up with 6 12-team conferences, and they'd own what became the BCS. That's why everybody joined a conference. Even *the* dominant team of the era, FSU, did. Everybody did. (Except Notre Dame, but that's just because of their NBC contract.) We were supposed to have 6 12-conferences by now, and nobody else would get in. But it hasn't turned out quite that simple. Almost, but not quite. And we don't have 6 12-team conferences like was supposedly gonna happen, do we?

If the TV money changes things again, the story about conferences will change again. For example, if there's an actual playoff, and if the 12-team conferences see themselves taking hits because their conference championship games are knocking one of their best teams out of it right at the very end, while slightly-smaller conferences that have no championship game get 2 teams in, well, what do you think is gonna happen? What will the SEC want more? An SEC championship game? Or 2 teams instead of 1 in a billion-dollar national championship playoff? Here's what I think they'd do: I think they'd tell Vandy and either Kentucky (b-ball?) or Miss.St. to take a hike, shrink to 10 teams with everybody playing everybody, and kill the title game. Maybe not, but that's what I'd expect.

Flosman
05-01-2009, 02:04 PM
In the OP the poster thinks we do not need an actual playoff. I just can't understand this thinking. If done, within 3 years everyone will mock the days that the NC was decided has it is today. Play the damn games on the field and crown the actual winners. The current system is stupid IMO.

Birds of B'more
05-01-2009, 03:43 PM
In the OP the poster thinks we do not need an actual playoff. I just can't understand this thinking. If done, within 3 years everyone will mock the days that the NC was decided has it is today. Play the damn games on the field and crown the actual winners. The current system is stupid IMO.

Just for the record, I said we do need a college football playoff. It was ESPN.com's Mark Schlabach, whose story I pasted into the OP, that said it wasn't necessary for a full playoff system and that a "plus-one" game alone would satisfy him.

Flosman
05-06-2009, 01:57 PM
Just for the record, I said we do need a college football playoff. It was ESPN.com's Mark Schlabach, whose story I pasted into the OP, that said it wasn't necessary for a full playoff system and that a "plus-one" game alone would satisfy him.


Sorry I re read your post and obviously you changed it.:p