Jump to content

Maryland Terp Football

All Terps football talk!


131 topics in this forum

    • 3 replies
    • 335 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 805 views
    • 1 reply
    • 952 views
    • 7 replies
    • 387 views
    • 4 replies
    • 3.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 840 views
    • 20 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 6 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 24 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.7k views
  1. #12 Penn St @ MD

    • 11 replies
    • 1.8k views
  2. #21 Terps at Temple 1 2

    • 22 replies
    • 2.5k views
  3. Terps 2019 Schedule

    • 11 replies
    • 2.4k views
  • Posts

    • I don’t think they need to be only for homegrown guys. Just the right guys! I think Burnes is a right guy. Now if we can’t extend him before he hits free agency and he gets 10 year 30 million per from someone you have to walk away. Id try an extension that has a higher AAV but a shorter term. Say you expect him to get $30 per for 10 in free agency. Then give him 7 years and perhaps an opt out after 4. 
    • You have to find a way to get him on the ML team. 
    • Yeah I was hopeful for him but after seeing last night (where it all caught up to him) I just don't think he has the stuff any more. He used to have an excellent 2 seamer with good velocity and arm side run but that doesn't seem to exist anymore with the velocity drop.
    • Well I was just a peon when I worked there, so it’s not like that experience mattered in my decision. And my view on extensions isn’t you are paying for past years. Hell, I would sign Holliday today and Gunnar is only a year into things. The issue with the extensions is that you are already have the player(s) locked up for most of the years anyway. So, when you sign them to an extension, you are guaranteeing 7-9 years but really all you are gaining is 2-3 years.  It’s a lot of money and guarantees for only a few years. Now, the one thing that I have talked about that is important here is if you don’t extend them, do you look to trade them 1-2 years away from free agency because you don’t want to lose a talent like Gunnar, for example, for nothing.  So, maybe the extension buys you a few additional years on top of what are already getting.  OTOH, you may just decide to go for it with the player and lose them for nothing. I guess you always have the option of going the Tatis route and go 14-15 years but I’m not sure of anyone who is advocating for that or would be ok with that.  As for your business decision point here..I think that’s probably the biggest reason you do it…because players like the commitment and the fans like the commitment and there is value to that.
    • Honestly, I’m much more concerned about Tate than Akin.   91.7 mph avg velocity on the sinker. 11.4% K rate. 11.4% BB rate. 91.8 mph exit velocity. 53.8% hard hit rate. 9.8% whiff rate. 14.5% chase rate. 3.8% swinging strike rate. 4.50 ERA. 5.70 FIP. 5.49 xFIP. 5.06 SIERRA.  6.30 xERA. 84 stuff+ on sinker. 88 location+ on sinker. The ground ball rate is still good, but I’m not sure that’s going to be enough to save him.    
×
×
  • Create New...