Jump to content

Orioles Talk

Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat


20342 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 200 views
    • 3 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 128 replies
    • 41.7k views
    • 46 replies
    • 1k views
    • 85 replies
    • 3.3k views
    • 151 replies
    • 6.3k views
    • 51 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 112 replies
    • 5.1k views
  1. Angels series 4/22-24 1 2 3

    • 30 replies
    • 867 views
    • 6 replies
    • 341 views
    • 230 replies
    • 11.1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 132 views
    • 1k replies
    • 43.7k views
    • 67 replies
    • 2.9k views
  2. 2024 Gameball Thread 1 2 3

    • 33 replies
    • 805 views
  • Posts

    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
×
×
  • Create New...