Orioles Talk
Michael "weams" Williams memorial Orioles chat
20307 topics in this forum
-
- 6 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 128 replies
- 41.6k views
-
- 194 replies
- 7.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 137 views
-
- 589 replies
- 28.3k views
-
- 79 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 67 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 31 replies
- 454 views
-
- 52 replies
- 2k views
-
- 96 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 418 replies
- 19.4k views
-
- 26 replies
- 791 views
-
- 52 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 43 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 106 replies
- 5.6k views
.thumb.gif.5a61fe54435e3842f2e474318a623287.gif)
-
Posts
-
By Just Regular · Posted
So far at Camden it has been LF Hays, RF Cowser, but out on the road I'm curious to see if they flip corners if/when Hays enters as a Santander defensive replacement. There's probably some GM who feels like a RF Arm has been wasted, but OPACY has a lot more grass in LF than RF. The big unknown is if Hays can untrack with a different playing time cadence than he's ever experienced. Iron sharpening iron can break bad for some of the atoms. -
OH aren’t stupid. Well, most aren’t. He had a horrible July. His OPS from August 1 thru the end of the regular season was .771. Your narrative that he’s been mostly awful since July 1 of 2023 is complete BS. No one expects you to admit it. You’ll double down using the July numbers to suggest that he’s sucked the whole time. Business as usual. -
Just my 2 cents, but I like the 1/9. The 10-game intervals was a little too frequent, but 18 games seems like a decent enough sample size to get some rough trends. And holy crap we have 4/9 guys in our lineup that are hotter than the Sun. -
-
By Sports Guy · Posted
He had a nice stretch of 90 PA from Aug 16 through Sept 12 of last year. Outside of that stretch, he has been awful. Since July 1 of last year, Hays has 313 PA. His slash line is 206/268/339/607. That is despite a 943 OPS in those aforementioned 90 PA. Essentially, he has been Jorge Mateo for half a season worth of at bats. So yea, he has largely been terrible for the last 3.5 months of play. He was good for less than a 1/3 of that time.
-
