MLB
Talk baseball
7979 topics in this forum
-
- 19 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 7 replies
- 10.7k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 30.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 244 views
-
- 20 replies
- 616 views
-
- 18 replies
- 420 views
-
- 4.6k replies
- 424.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 176 views
-
- 0 replies
- 64 views
-
- 3 replies
- 141 views
-
- 4 replies
- 155 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 15 replies
- 719 views
-
- 6 replies
- 439 views
-
- 100 replies
- 2.6k views
.thumb.gif.5a61fe54435e3842f2e474318a623287.gif)
-
Posts
-
Sorry, I deleted the Grayson question because I saw it was being discussed in the Extension Priority thread and SG had mentioned he wasn't talking about pre-arb players here. But I wasn't fast enough for you guys. -
Exactly. We've got him for the entirety of his 20s. There's no need to guarantee him anything into his 30s, and it would only really work out in favor of the O's if he has a borderline HOF career. I like him; I don't like him that much. -
By Sanfran327 · Posted
Correct. Or worse, he could be Tim Lincecum, who was a generational pitcher with an incredibly short shelf life. Well, only worse if we extend him early and he breaks. -
By Bemorewins · Posted
How would you replace him next year? Most likely that would involve a big time trade and giving up a serious prospect or 2. Or signing another FA who is not as good as Burnes. -
There's very little upside to a Rodriguez extension for the Orioles, unless Grayson becomes a generational pitcher.
-
