MLB
Talk baseball
7978 topics in this forum
-
- 19 replies
- 18.6k views
-
- 7 replies
- 10.7k views
-
- 4.6k replies
- 423.8k views
-
- 2 replies
- 72 views
-
- 4 replies
- 128 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1k views
-
- 15 replies
- 468 views
-
- 6 replies
- 424 views
-
- 100 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 1.2k replies
- 30.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 53 views
-
- 0 replies
- 47 views
-
- 1 reply
- 89 views
-
- 3 replies
- 151 views
-
- 3 replies
- 161 views
.thumb.gif.5a61fe54435e3842f2e474318a623287.gif)
-
Posts
-
71% strikes is good. When 50% of those wind up middle middle, no bueno. -
I didn’t see the interview but it sounds delusional. Just like in ST when his velocity dipped back down from 95 to 92 he said it was because he was working on location. Dude, you had 95 with command your first ST start and 92 with no command in your last 3. What are you talking about?
-
By Sports Guy · Posted
He threw 71% of his pitches for strikes but only missed 3 bats. He has to miss more bats than that. -
-
.thumb.gif.5a61fe54435e3842f2e474318a623287.gif)
By interloper · Posted
What's worse is after the game he did the delusional pitcher act and said how good he felt and how he was making good pitches. Bro... You were giving up nukes and you couldn't locate a fastball inside on any hitter the entire game. Deserved the quick hook IMO and it's worrying that he apparently doesn't realize he's pitching poorly.
-
