Orioles History
Here, you can talk about Orioles of the past, what teams were like way back when, and anything else concerning the team since 1954.
228 topics in this forum
-
- 51 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 214 replies
- 135.7k views
-
- 3 replies
- 178 views
-
- 0 replies
- 211 views
-
- 40 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 272 views
-
- 0 replies
- 148 views
-
- 0 replies
- 72 views
-
- 2 replies
- 499 views
-
- 1 reply
- 333 views
-
- 0 replies
- 251 views
-
- 1 reply
- 270 views
-
- 3 replies
- 426 views
-
- 2 replies
- 488 views
-
- 2 replies
- 612 views
.thumb.jpeg.787f420fe38f6f52b526196c7c538025.jpeg)
-
Posts
-
People keep talking about Norby's flawed defense, meanwhile Holliday is looking pretty bad out there. Small sample size, I guess! But how long is the leash? -
By Roy Firestone · Posted
the Royals gave us the business tonight...except for the slam by Adley...we stunk to high hell tonight...especially the pen...Akin and Tate...they both came up small. -
I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion. -
-
I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
-
