NCAA Basketball
Talk NCAA Hoops
117 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 331 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 14 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 280 views
-
- 3 replies
- 795 views
-
- 217 replies
- 30.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 17 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 12 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 20 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.4k views
-
Posts
-
Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in. The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum. -
I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting. It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat. Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane. In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. -
By Can_of_corn · Posted
I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. -
Actually it will. As you noted. MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees. The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.
-
By Can_of_corn · Posted
My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle. Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
-
