O's Amateur Draft and International Signings
All O's Amateur Draft and International Signings Talk
2119 topics in this forum
-
- 45 replies
- 10.2k views
-
- 109 replies
- 18.8k views
-
- 203 replies
- 29.2k views
-
- 237 replies
- 35.2k views
-
- 84 replies
- 18k views
-
- 13 replies
- 573 views
-
- 153 replies
- 15.9k views
-
- 42 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 416 views
-
- 0 replies
- 130 views
-
- 25 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 80 replies
- 13k views
-
- 69 replies
- 9.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
Posts
-
People keep talking about Norby's flawed defense, meanwhile Holliday is looking pretty bad out there. Small sample size, I guess! But how long is the leash? -
By Roy Firestone · Posted
the Royals gave us the business tonight...except for the slam by Adley...we stunk to high hell tonight...especially the pen...Akin and Tate...they both came up small. -
I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion. -
-
I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
-
