Plus Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


JohnD last won the day on February 28 2007

JohnD had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,277 Hall of Famer

About JohnD

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 2/11/1979

Personal Information

  • Location
  • Homepage
  • Occupation
  1. You could argue a good shake up is due in scouting and player development. The farm system looks almost as bad as 15 years ago, both in terms of talent and development. Thats Duqs biggest fault. For all the diamonds in the rough he finds they tend to be role players. And as valuable as they are, they do a crappy job of developing stars. Machado is the only one really, and now that he is an established vet you don't see anyone else coming to help.
  2. The saddest thing is he has the weakest arm in the infield. Davis keeps making scoops that bail him but you worry it may cost them at some point. He isn't a liability but he isn't the strength he used to be.
  3. Also I believe the Orioles pay 980/570 to carry their games.
  4. Granted I used to work there and have friends who still do, including the guy who wrote that promo (he is the boss), but so what? To me this is a fun rivalry. Good the days each team plays each other and then pretty meaningless the other 158 days. He had that jab. I talked shit about how the Orioles (and AL as a whole) are the varsity league when I was out with friends who are Nats fans last night. The implication that the Nats are in a JV league. Have fun with the trash talk.
  5. Do the Os view Rickard and Gentry as redundant? That's the big question. Otherwise it's gonna be a pitcher I think
  6. My guess? Doom. luckily this team wins every time they lose someone crucial.
  7. If you think Manny plays that well on instinct and ability and gives no thought to the matter you're nuts. i have no problem moving him to SS next year. I think he would probably prepare differently in the offseason and come in with a different body as opposed to how he preps for a year at third. And I just don't have high hopes that Hardy will be able to physically play at a high level for too much longer. Obviously it all depends on if the Orioles agree and on who is available among SS and 3b.
  8. Eff off with this talk. We are three games in.
  9. I don't think it's that so much as realizing that in a time everyone measures everything, there are some things that can't be measured. That some guys do rise to the moment better than others, or will figure out how to get an extra squeeze out of their talent and ability. he isn't looking for a roster full of Ecksteins, but concedes character needs to be taken into account at a time people are now focusing only on what can be measured. it won't revolutionize the game the way Moneyball did, but he admits it matters and you have to see players as people too, not just items on a spreadsheet.
  10. Was listening to that interview today and to be honest there are some pretty interesting things worth posting here. First the bad news, and least interesting (and No Duh moment) part related to the Orioles, where he mentioned the Arrieta/Strop for Feldman deal as the most lopsided he's ever made. Called Strop a throw-in, and said Arrieta has exceeded what they expected from him. More interestingly they asked him about market inefficiencies, and how the guys he picked up for the Red Sox run in 2004 were all cheap and undervalued. Now everyone has stats guys in the front office, when back then only a few teams did. So now perhaps the undervalued trait teams should pay closer to attention to is "makeup" and the so-called intangibles some guys are lauded for. He used Kyle Hendricks as an example of that, noting he was picked up by the Cubs in a trade where all other things being equal, their scouts praised the heck out of the attitude and work ethic of Hendricks versus the other players available. The idea was that if they were going to take a flyer on anyone, do it on the guy you can count on to do his absolute best and bring the right attitude. It's from there that I started thinking about the Orioles right away. We've talked about ad nauseum (as have lots of others around the game) about the flaws of this team. But the leaders include guys like Cap10 America Adam Jones, Zach Britton, Darren O'Day, and JJ Hardy, who I think we all agree have great work ethics. Joey Rickard and Caleb Joseph have less experience, but seem to work hard and say all the right things. Donnie Hart is on that same sort of path. Prior to that, Matt Wieters would be in the same group. So that's not to say that this team is destined for World Series glory, or that all of that doesn't cover up other flaws. But the example set by Buck and players in leadership roles seems to be overlooked by some people pretty easily (in part because you can't really measure it) and so even in spite of all their success, it makes you wonder if the O's front office was ahead of the game in this regard and are correct in seemingly putting more stock in something that other teams don't always do.
  11. The name sort of makes you go "hmmm" but I'm not sure who he would replace on the roster, and I'm not sure he isn't redundant. Isn't he basically a poor man's Adam Jones? I'm thrilled to have the Capt. America version. I'd sign him for Norfolk just in case disaster strikes, but the only other player I'd consider him over might be Rickard, and even then it'd have to involve some re-arranged roles for guys like Kim and Gentry as a result.
  12. After being a vocal critic of Gausman and his future potential before last year, I really really think he's going to blow up big this year. It'll be needed too, because I have little faith in Tillman's shoulder holding up to the point he is what he was first half of last year or at other times in recent years. By July Gausman will be our clear cut number one guy.
  13. Hoiles first
  14. Coaches have their own lockers/office now. Separate from the clubhouse. i thought this was a fascinating article free of any supposedly agenda. It simply highlighted an unusual arrangement and the tension that has resulted. For the most part I think Anderson has been a big benefit and credit the Os for doing something different and innovative. He clearly has value and good for the Orioles not caring about tradition snd shoehorning him into one spot. And good for Brady for looking at things differently. But the chain of command has to be concerning. He needs to report to Duq because now it leaves ambiguity about who is on what page. And he has to stay out of the clubhouse in that respect too. It is never easy doing something different in baseball, which you see from Wallace and Chiti and their resistance. And it's clear a few things need cleaned up even if the net gain is positive.
  15. Even if revenues keep going up, up, up? I mean, the cost of everything in all lines of work are going up, up, up. And there's no way the Angelos clan isn't hording dollars like Old Man Potter.