Jump to content
Don Quixote

Retired Players Speak on "Bountygate"

Recommended Posts

Several retired players spoke with ESPN writer Elizabeth Merrill, offering their perspective on the recent scandal involving the New Orleans Saints - a perspective that states the Saints indeed crossed the line.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7799825/retired-nfl-players-known-toughness-say-new-orleans-saints-gregg-williams-crossed-line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not going to go to deep of the end here. But I think there are a lot of things that guys from that era think is wrong the game today. And it doesn't just stop at bounties. But even beyond that, your soundbite "a perspective that states they crossed the line" doesn't delve deep enough into their commentary and acts as a quick summary judgment of comments. This quote for example says something to me:

It was something we all knew. It's been going on forever. But I didn't think it was still going on today. Guys make so much money. So yeah, it was a surprise to me that guys who make millions would be [motivated] by $1,000. That a player would try to hurt another player for what would be considered beer money. It doesn't make any sense to me.

So in the first bolded part he recognizes that extra incentives were valuable and used in the past. In fact says it was essential always part of the cutlure. Then he says he's surprised it was going on. This just seems immensely out of touch to me. I think this was going on, in lots and lots of locker rooms, even the NFL had a hunch when they started to investigate. So I'm curious about his real awareness about the game.

I think the second bolded part is the part that people don't talk about. I think he's right. I don't think the money incentives really mattered that much. The incentive becomes so much on winning. And that the bounties/ijuries put your team in a better place to win. The money helped focus on an area that's probably not a huge part of the gameplan. So in compensating for not spending a lot of time prepping in the area, by giving them something to recall it. It's an extra tool to remind players to be extreme to playing all the way up to the whistle.

This whole bounty thing is a really interesting cross roads for the NFL...it will be interesting to see it's long term impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the article. If I felt like going more in-depth at the time or had the time to do so (I was on a brief "work" break), I would have. I was sharing an article for others to read and possibly discuss its content, not receive unnecessary criticism for a perceived lack of intelligence or analytical ability. Not in the mood for a pissing contest, thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha. Wow...I'm not sure I meant that as any kind of criticism per se, or lack of intelligence or analytic ability. I was pretty much just trying to say that it seemed like it was cursory and I felt that the notion that the article was indicating older players found bounties to be from a perspective that they thought they crossed the line while partially true, just needed a bit of clarification.

I think this whole issue stemmed by ESPN and the media has created a pro-bounty or anti-bounty camp. And I just think everything is way more gray than your summary. Which was admittedly short. Sorry to offend you, I thought it was a good read and provides a good new/unique perspective. I'm glad you posted it. No pissing contest here. Just general extended discussion about the content of the article and how I think older players are fundamentally disconnected from today's game because it was a different time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



Rumors and News






  • Posts

    • Notice that the O's have quietly gathered up an interesting stable of lefties:  Bishop, Lowther, Wells, DL Hall, Akin, and arguably Tanner Scott.  In past years, I'd have to reach and mention guys like Lee and Means - no longer - though I did kinda mention them right there.        
    • I would say that Bonds left a legacy in San Francisco.  He left Pittsburgh two years later than Manny.   When I think of the Braves.  Greg Maddox comes to mind though he came up with the Cubs.
    • Again, I don't think teams are going to drop his value because of what he did mostly at 19, but if he had that feather in his cap his value would be much more in my opinion. Basically he's a post season unknown. Of course his career .240/.296/.406/.702 slash line in 611 Sep/Oct PAs could be an indicator of a guy who either gets tired late in the year or who doesn't do well in pennant races (the Orioles have been in the mix in September for most of his career). If I'm giving a guy $300 million i want to make sure he's at his best when the lights are the brightest.
    • Perhaps, but I think a legacy is more than putting up a numbers. A legacy is being known as one of the best for a team, usually a team you were drafted and developed by. It does bring up an interesting thought on what a legacy really is. Did Reggie Jackson leave a legacy with the Yankees for his Mr. October heroics? Despite those heroics, I doubt many Yankees fans would name to their top Yankees team.  

      When I think legacy, I think of guys who when you name a team, you think of them. Obviously legacy Orioles would be Brooks, Palmer, Cal and Weaver. But some might argue that Frank Robinson and Eddie Murray left a legacy here as well. Now I'm partial to Eddie because he WAS the Orioles when I was growing up, but at the end of the day, the Orioles won only World Series during his time and he spent 8 season out of an Orioles uniform. So I guess I have to wonder can Machado still leave a legacy with another team? When I think about it, he does have time but it would probably have to be with a team without a long history of legacy players. In other words, could he become a legacy player with some team like the Diamondbacks or Rockies? Probably. But I doubt he would if he became a Red Sox, Yankee, or Dodger. 

      It's an interesting thought. But I do know is the Orioles are the only team in which he could end up one of the greatest players ever. The Orioles are really the only team in which he has a chance to one day be considered for the team's "Mt Rushmore". 
    • Baseball America had him in their top 20 NY/Penn league prospects over Lowther and Hanifee. So people like him. I’m not as high on him, and I’ll explain why in detail as I do my top prospect countdown. An interesting aside from the BA top 20 NY/Penn league list is they asked a scout about Hunter Harvey (who didn’t pitch enough to qualify for the list) and the scout said if he was eligible he’d be #1 (over McKay who is probably a top 100 guy).
    • Fair enough, and I suppose if Manny had a good postseason in 2012 it would be another feather in his cap.    But I’m much more likely to assign meaning to Adam Jones’ .155/.206/.207 line in 63 postseason PA in his age 26, 28 and 30 seasons, than to Manny’s .174/.240/.348 over 27 PA, almost all of which was accrued in his age 19 season.    I don’t think that teams pursuing Manny will give his postseason performance any serious weight.    
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×