Jump to content
Fired-Up

Why do people value WAR/Arbitrary formulas.

Recommended Posts

Look I'm all for critical thinking and interpretation of stats. Something that bugs me is this stupid WAR stat. I absolutely hate it. I see it tossed around sites and blogs everywhere. It's even breaking into the mainstream. ESPN is using it. Sportswriters are using it. It's driving me crazy.

I posted in the MLB forum about Mike Trout's season when the subject of his WAR came up. This is what I wrote,

"To me WAR is an absolutely horrible statistic. I don't mind us trying to assign a value to estimate the amount of wins a player contributes. This number should be subjective though. WAR is a made up, arbitrary formula. It's the opposite of what stats should be, which is objective and concrete. Take for instance batting average. You divide the hits by the AB's. There is no ifs and or buts. Just this season baseball reference completely altered their WAR. Their old one had Matt Kemp as the best player in the MLB by a huge margin last year. Now he's back down to Earth. They are just taking made up formulas to assign a bogus value on a player. How about this one? The Dodgers are 4 games under .500 without Matt Kemp and about 15 games over .500 with him. I don't need a made up number to tell me he is the best player in the league. I already know when he's healthy that he is."

I can't understand why people would value WAR when it's a completely arbitrary formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your post could be expressed a little bit more eloquently, and considering it's late at night I'm not going to attempt to do that either so I certainly won't hold it against you. In other words, I get what you're saying, and I agree with it, though I know where people will try to poke holes into your thoughts/argument. So, yeah, I'm glad you brought this issue up (fWAR is an especially absurd stat--or, it's not an absurd stat in-and-of-itself, but the way people flagrantly misuse it is absurd), and I'm looking forward on checking back in on this thread tomorrow... (smiley face/emoticon)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either you know how to use a statistic or you don't. There are people of both kinds who embrace and/or reject WAR, for largely relevant reasons. Absent some evidence that you're in the former camp, this thread should probably just die. Aneurism-like. Not slowly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Either you know how to use a statistic or you don't. There are people of both kinds who embrace and/or reject WAR, for largely relevant reasons. Absent some evidence that you're in the former camp, this thread should probably just die. Aneurism-like. Not slowly.

How exactly should you use a flawed, subjective statistic? What's the best way to do that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's be clear--WAR isn't a statistic. It's not a factual piece of data.

It's a subjective rating that's deeply flawed. It can be useful in the context of actual statistics, and the good ole' eye test. But it's certainly not the be all, end all, that many think it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How exactly should you use a flawed, subjective statistic? What's the best way to do that?

That is exactly my train of thought. It's arbitrary. I could make up my own arbitrary formula. Granted, I'm not as credible as baseball reference, but the point still remains. WAR is subjective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fack! I meant to edit my post but somehow managed to delete it...

http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Baseball-WAR

It's a statistic. It follows a formula. It can't be flawed in-and-of-itself. Philosophically speaking, it's basically necessarily true that the way people use it is flawed, not the statistic itself.

EDIT: In the post I deleted I went on a bit of a rant about how the name itself, Wins Above Replacement is problematic, not necessarily for logical reasons but more for psychological ones; one of my biggest pet peeves is how people use WAR in such an absolutist fashion as if presenting a WAR statistic was a trump card in a zero-sum game...if it were simply called Runs Above Replacement or Value Points Above Replacement this effect might be mitigated a bit. It just doesn't really translate to reality when we do things like compare Chase Headley and Wilson Betemit and their respective WARs and say, oh okay, we'd have 4.5 more wins over the course of a full season with Betemit, or, you know, Chase's WAR pro-rated over the final 2 months will be worth this many wins..only 1.5? That's not going to change us from fringe-WC contender to contender!

Edited by Flash- bd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How is it subjective?

How is it not? Are there not multiple WAR numbers? Do the individual systems not change frequently?

Seriously? It's the definition of subjective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How is it not? Are there not multiple WAR numbers? Do the individual systems not change frequently?

Seriously? It's the definition of subjective.

Just because there are different ways to model something doesn't make them subjective, let alone arbitrary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fack! I meant to edit my post but somehow managed to delete it...

http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Baseball-WAR

It's a statistic. It follows a formula. It can't be flawed in-and-of-itself. Philosophically speaking, it's basically necessarily true that the way people use it is flawed, not the statistic itself.

Statistical Modeling 101.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just because there are different ways to model something doesn't make them subjective, let alone arbitrary.

Yes, that's exactly what it means. You seem confused about the word subjective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



Rumors and News






  • Posts

    • You must admit we run the wide range of opinions here, some have me scratching my head as to what team they actually like.  
    • Other teams aren’t just dropping out of the market because it’s getting late. The crux of dumpster diving is that it’s the scraps no one wants. 
    • Let me amend my last statement a bit. Detroit and Cincy are definitely less appealing destinations then Baltimore. I'd argue the Phillies and White Sox are on the upswing so they'd probably be more appealing to most FAs. I think this discussion might merit it's own thread!
    • The Orioles do not want to sign any free agent pitchers to any deals longer than 3 years.  These 2 guys are simply going to be too expensive and demand too many years. I wish it wasn't so, but the fact that we just got out from under Ubaldo's abysmal 4 year deal is probably not going to help persuade them to rethink their policy.
    • I'd feel much better about signing Cain to a four year deal if he was 27. If they decide to go the route of a speedster, they might be better off signing someone Jarrod Dyson to a one year deal given the uncertainty of the direction in which this team is heading long term. Other than starting pitchers, I don't think they should be giving three or four year deals to any offensive players right now (aside from extending Schoop). This is a team in limbo even if they're too naive to admit it.  And to that point, I wonder how Duquette is able to even sell multi-year deals to respective free agents? Everyone knows that Machado is on his way out and that this team, as constructed, will probably not be able to contend. Why would anyone want to sign a multi-year deal wit the Orioles right now (over another team) unless it's strictly for the money? Short of Miami, I'm not sure there's a less appealing team in the majors right now. And yes, San Diego is bad too, but at least you get to live in San Diego.  
    • The question is, will the OHOF hold their PED use against them?    They’ve kept Raffy out.    We might need to wait until some of the 2012-17 core has retired.    I’d expect Markakis, Hardy, Wieters and Jones all to go in one day.    Manny and Schoop are further away but will get in later.   
    • Could DD simply be waiting for the asking prices to become reasonable and then strike to land two guys like a Cobb & Lynn? Next year there are some great position players who will be Free Agents, but not pitching. With teams trying to limit spending this year why not splurge for two such pitchers and then you could trade them after this year if you need to. The idea being that those teams willing to spend next year will not find much pitching on the market. Could this plan work?
  • Popular Contributors

×