Jump to content
Frobby

The Orioles, 10 games at a time

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, O's84 said:

41 games under .500, unbelievable!

 

11 hours ago, O's84 said:

41 games under .500, unbelievable!

41 games under .500 at the end of the season is unbelievable. I don't think there's a word for 41 games under .500 before the all star break.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, vab said:

 

41 games under .500 at the end of the season is unbelievable. I don't think there's a word for 41 games under .500 before the all star break.

That word is "Orioles"

I think I might start using Orioles as an adjective.  Like if I had a bad day, someone asks "Hey, how's it going?"  I'll just be like "Orioles, man."

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

That is an incredible run of ineptitude.   You'd think that just once, for a week and a half a team could muster .500 baseball.   

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

That is an incredible run of ineptitude.   You'd think that just once, for a week and a half a team could muster .500 baseball.   

But the weather!!!!!!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

That is an incredible run of ineptitude.   You'd think that just once, for a week and a half a team could muster .500 baseball.   

To be fair they did win 5 of 6 from May 9 to May 13 (doubleheader with Ray's included) which allowed them to go 6-4 for 10 games. It was a glorious time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, O-Arm36 said:

To be fair they did win 5 of 6 from May 9 to May 13 (doubleheader with Ray's included) which allowed them to go 6-4 for 10 games. It was a glorious time. 

Yes, I do remember the Glory Days.   They also went 4-4 on their last homestand, which for them is a wildly hot streak.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the current 10 game segment isn’t complete, the O’s are currently 5-3, meaning it will be the first reported segment all year where they weren’t under .500.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

While the current 10 game segment isn’t complete, the O’s are currently 5-3, meaning it will be the first reported segment all year where they weren’t under .500.    

 

o

 

Earlier in the thread, I noted that the Orioles have indeed have a sequence of going over .500 for a 10-game span. 

It was not at the precise increments of Games 1 through 10, Games 11 through 20, Games 21 through 30, etc, but they did go 6-4 over a 10 game span (7-5 in a 12-game span) earlier this season.

 

 

 

On 5/24/2018 at 11:27 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

They did actually manage to go 6-3 over a 9-game span, 6-4 over a 10-game span, and 7-5 over an 12-game span, although not precisely at the 10-game increments that start on Opening Day.

 

W ) vs. ROYALS ) (5-3)

W ) vs. ROYALS ) (11-6)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (9-4)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (6-3)

L ) vs. D-RAYS ) (10-3)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (17-1)

L ) vs. PHILLIES ) (4-1)

L ) vs. RED SOX ) (6-2)

W ) vs. RED SOX ) (7-4)

L ) vs. RED SOXS ) (6-3)

L ) vs. RED SOXS ) (5-0)

W ) vs. WHITE SOX ) (3-2)

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2018-schedule-scores.shtml

 

o

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, OFFNY said:

o

 

Earlier in the thread, I noted that the Orioles have indeed have a sequence of going over .500 for a 10-game span. 

It was not at the precise increments of Games 1 through 10, Games 11 through 20, Games 21 through 30, etc, but they did go 6-4 over a 10 game span (7-4 in an 11-game span) earlier this season.

 

 

 

 

Yes, I know.   That’s why I used the words “reported segment.”    The place where I delineate the segments is in a sense arbitrary, but on the other hand, it’s not cherry-picked to yield a favorable or unfavorable result.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

Yes, I know. That’s why I used the words “reported segment.” The place where I delineate the segments is in a sense arbitrary, but on the other hand, it’s not cherry-picked to yield a favorable or unfavorable result.    

 

o

 

OK.

When you said "reported segment", I interpreted that as any report in the thread and/or any 10-game segment of the season.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/3/2018 at 11:27 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

(AUGUST 3rd)

 

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

5-5

_____

33-77

 

o

3-7, to go 36-84.    Right at .300.   

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







×
×
  • Create New...