adam_jonzin'

MASN Continues to Reject In-Market Streaming

82 posts in this topic

A real shocker here, folks. Amidst the recent lifting of in-market blackout restrictions, MASN is one of only two remaining networks refusing to allow in-market streaming of their club's games in 2017, perfectly demonstrating the exact number of fudgenuts Peter Angelos gives when it comes to his fanbase. 

http://awfulannouncing.com/local-networks/rob-manfred-says-market-streaming-deals-close-three-mlb-teams.html

I hate ranting, but this got me pretty worked up. I happen to be in middle of the "cord-cutting" process and falsely believed I might actually be able to watch the O's on the MLB.tv app. When I found this article and saw, "all but three teams..." in the title -- there really was no reason to continue reading. 

Edited by adam_jonzin'
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who aren't in the know about this, could you explain what market streaming is, how it works for other clubs, etc?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will not be bullied into subscribing to a cable or satellite service just for MASN. Cutting the cord and the radio will do just fine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I'll just continue to pay for a VPN service and use MLB.tv. I'm sure MLB doesn't mind one bit. Screw you, MASN.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

A real shocker here, folks. Amidst the recent lifting of in-market blackout restrictions, MASN is one of only two remaining networks refusing to allow in-market streaming of their club's games in 2017, perfectly demonstrating the exact number of fudgenuts Peter Angelos gives when it comes to his fanbase. 

http://awfulannouncing.com/local-networks/rob-manfred-says-market-streaming-deals-close-three-mlb-teams.html

I hate ranting, but this got me pretty worked up. I happen to be in middle of the "cord-cutting" process and falsely believed I might actually be able to watch the O's on the MLB.tv app. When I found this article and saw, "all but three teams..." in the title -- there really was no reason to continue reading. 

One of two networks? Is the other one MASN2? J/K I'm sure they are both counted as one in this instance.

Like you, I cut the cord once and was annoyed at the blackouts on MLB.tv although I thought it was a really good platform otherwise. I reconnected the cord a few years ago mostly so I could watch the O's. They are really the only reason I remain corded. I love Sunday Ticket, but I could live without it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The MLB.tv app lets you stream a ton of baseball games. It's like Sunday Ticket. With one caveat: for years now, it has been impossible to stream a team's games from inside of that team's market, due to blackout restrictions imposed by the league which benefit that team's local broadcast network. I could stream an O's game on the MLB.tv app (which is subscription based) only from outside of the market -- say, in Florida. 

For 2017, that rule is expiring and networks are pivoting to allow in-market streaming of their club's games. They're doing this because of shifting viewing trends -- knowing fans are cutting the cable cord. Not wanting to lose them.

But there appears to be some sort of "States Rights" situation where individual clubs/networks have the right to decide. And all of them have decided to go with the trends -- except for MASN (and the LA Dodgers, I believe).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This lack of steaming might just be a product of the ongoing lawsuit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Then I'll just continue to pay for a VPN service and use MLB.tv. I'm sure MLB doesn't mind one bit. Screw you, MASN.

Well yeah, there's that. But that's not the point. And the average fan doesn't understand how that even works.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Then I'll just continue to pay for a VPN service and use MLB.tv. I'm sure MLB doesn't mind one bit. Screw you, MASN.

Bingo!!  I will do this if I ever move back to an in market area.  I pay $89 a year to watch all the baseball I can handle on my computer, phone, tablet, or streaming through a Roku or PS4.  And the best part is that I have not yet hit the "limit" in number of devices I can use- my friends all use my account it is great!  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they are jerking the Nats  chain  keep masn front and center until dispute is resolved.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

The Nats have definitely been held hostage through all of this.

That was always the idea of MASN. Come in to the market, but don't prosper. In perpetuity. And the Nats and MLB felt they could get around that. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Sounds like they are jerking the Nats  chain  keep masn front and center until dispute is resolved.

 

12 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

The Nats have definitely been held hostage through all of this.

I don't see what this issue has to do with prejudicing the Nats.   

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, terps19 said:

Bingo!!  I will do this if I ever move back to an in market area.  I pay $89 a year to watch all the baseball I can handle on my computer, phone, tablet, or streaming through a Roku or PS4.  And the best part is that I have not yet hit the "limit" in number of devices I can use- my friends all use my account it is great!  

Hey, I'm your friend! What was that password again:)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

I don't see what this issue has to do with prejudicing the Nats.   

It depends on how the MLB.tv money is distributed. I'm assuming that the Nats might get more money if more viewers watched the games via MLB.tv versus direct MASN. I don't know the pay flow from MLB.tv to local RSN's and to the teams. I assume the local RSN"s are compensated somehow. I think pumping viewers to the local Fox sports channel that paid the Dodgers an incredible amount of money is why the Dodgers rejected the deal. But I'm making the assumption that the local RSN must do better if MLB.tv is not available. I don't know that for a fact.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



Rumors and News






  • Posts

    • Alan Mills the next Houdini.Every year they say this guy fixed him or that guy.Buck said he was a much different pitcher in Spring Training. Same as it ever was.Look where my arm angle was.As the day goes by.
    • I think the standard answer is:   "I have nothing to tell you. I'm just giving the fireworks guy a chance to reload for the next home run."
    • Just thinking of all the possibities when it comes to Ubaldo. The guy is a team player and an all around good guy. BUT...he was signed when his velocity had been dropping.  This happens to most veteran power pitchers. With his weird windup, slinging the ball worked well when the velocity was 98 or so. But when it slows down, the pitcher has to learn how to pitch, not just sling it in there. Many veteran pitchers aren't able to make this adjustment and thus their MLB careers end. Unless Ubaldo learns how to pitch and not just throw, he won't be worth a whole lot to any MLB team. So, here are the possibities:  1. Try and engineer a trade. The problems with this is that everyone knows that he is in his walk year.  Any team that might be interested can wait and sign him.next year to a minor league contract and hope that they.can teach him how to pitch if it can be done. I doubt that anyone would be interested right now. 2. Release him and eat up his contract and free up his roster spot. Hopefully he won't become the next Jake Arrietta for another team. 3. Keep him around and put him back into the pen. Maybe Alan Mills can teach him how to pitch, at least in order to be serviceable in long relief or mop up. 4.Keep running him out there in the rotation and have a long relief guy available. Who knows,  he might actually learn how to pitch and then he can be re- signed for 4 more years. 😃    
    • Well I do think this team will have a good season. Hope so anyway.   
    • Well they replaced the turf thinking that might help and it didn't.  Doing something helps I guess. 
    • I agree I didn't want to see another 6'5" "projectable" 5th round WR.  But at the same time this roster did not scream to be go have a draft without a single skill position player. I feel like can if the ravens end up with 3 rookie of the year contenders they still failed a little on this draft.
    • Don't hate them at all. The O's pitchers should have come through. They didnt. The O's up 11-4 and the pitching can't shut the door. That game was just one of those things that happens in baseball. No hate from me. 
  • Popular Contributors