Jump to content
adam_jonzin'

MASN Continues to Reject In-Market Streaming

Recommended Posts

A real shocker here, folks. Amidst the recent lifting of in-market blackout restrictions, MASN is one of only two remaining networks refusing to allow in-market streaming of their club's games in 2017, perfectly demonstrating the exact number of fudgenuts Peter Angelos gives when it comes to his fanbase. 

http://awfulannouncing.com/local-networks/rob-manfred-says-market-streaming-deals-close-three-mlb-teams.html

I hate ranting, but this got me pretty worked up. I happen to be in middle of the "cord-cutting" process and falsely believed I might actually be able to watch the O's on the MLB.tv app. When I found this article and saw, "all but three teams..." in the title -- there really was no reason to continue reading. 

Edited by adam_jonzin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

A real shocker here, folks. Amidst the recent lifting of in-market blackout restrictions, MASN is one of only two remaining networks refusing to allow in-market streaming of their club's games in 2017, perfectly demonstrating the exact number of fudgenuts Peter Angelos gives when it comes to his fanbase. 

http://awfulannouncing.com/local-networks/rob-manfred-says-market-streaming-deals-close-three-mlb-teams.html

I hate ranting, but this got me pretty worked up. I happen to be in middle of the "cord-cutting" process and falsely believed I might actually be able to watch the O's on the MLB.tv app. When I found this article and saw, "all but three teams..." in the title -- there really was no reason to continue reading. 

One of two networks? Is the other one MASN2? J/K I'm sure they are both counted as one in this instance.

Like you, I cut the cord once and was annoyed at the blackouts on MLB.tv although I thought it was a really good platform otherwise. I reconnected the cord a few years ago mostly so I could watch the O's. They are really the only reason I remain corded. I love Sunday Ticket, but I could live without it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The MLB.tv app lets you stream a ton of baseball games. It's like Sunday Ticket. With one caveat: for years now, it has been impossible to stream a team's games from inside of that team's market, due to blackout restrictions imposed by the league which benefit that team's local broadcast network. I could stream an O's game on the MLB.tv app (which is subscription based) only from outside of the market -- say, in Florida. 

For 2017, that rule is expiring and networks are pivoting to allow in-market streaming of their club's games. They're doing this because of shifting viewing trends -- knowing fans are cutting the cable cord. Not wanting to lose them.

But there appears to be some sort of "States Rights" situation where individual clubs/networks have the right to decide. And all of them have decided to go with the trends -- except for MASN (and the LA Dodgers, I believe).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Then I'll just continue to pay for a VPN service and use MLB.tv. I'm sure MLB doesn't mind one bit. Screw you, MASN.

Well yeah, there's that. But that's not the point. And the average fan doesn't understand how that even works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Then I'll just continue to pay for a VPN service and use MLB.tv. I'm sure MLB doesn't mind one bit. Screw you, MASN.

Bingo!!  I will do this if I ever move back to an in market area.  I pay $89 a year to watch all the baseball I can handle on my computer, phone, tablet, or streaming through a Roku or PS4.  And the best part is that I have not yet hit the "limit" in number of devices I can use- my friends all use my account it is great!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

The Nats have definitely been held hostage through all of this.

That was always the idea of MASN. Come in to the market, but don't prosper. In perpetuity. And the Nats and MLB felt they could get around that. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Sounds like they are jerking the Nats  chain  keep masn front and center until dispute is resolved.

 

12 minutes ago, adam_jonzin' said:

The Nats have definitely been held hostage through all of this.

I don't see what this issue has to do with prejudicing the Nats.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, terps19 said:

Bingo!!  I will do this if I ever move back to an in market area.  I pay $89 a year to watch all the baseball I can handle on my computer, phone, tablet, or streaming through a Roku or PS4.  And the best part is that I have not yet hit the "limit" in number of devices I can use- my friends all use my account it is great!  

Hey, I'm your friend! What was that password again:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

I don't see what this issue has to do with prejudicing the Nats.   

It depends on how the MLB.tv money is distributed. I'm assuming that the Nats might get more money if more viewers watched the games via MLB.tv versus direct MASN. I don't know the pay flow from MLB.tv to local RSN's and to the teams. I assume the local RSN"s are compensated somehow. I think pumping viewers to the local Fox sports channel that paid the Dodgers an incredible amount of money is why the Dodgers rejected the deal. But I'm making the assumption that the local RSN must do better if MLB.tv is not available. I don't know that for a fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



Rumors and News






  • Posts

    • I get what you mean, Chris Davis seemed to hit lots of meaningless HR with no one on late in games.  But this is simply not realistic.  You get three four at bats and you do your best with them.  Maybe pitchers simply pitch differently with say a 4 run lead and no-one on base.  In fact I am sure of it... There is often some luck involved in stats and that is precisely the reason advanced metrics were created.  They are not perfect, but they are intended to make results more meaningful. If a player had a great year and hit .300 over 600 at bats that would be 180 hits. Over the course of the season, some of those at bats clearly are more important than others.  But the player isn't punished for that week he went 4 for 4 in a series against Baltimore (for example) any more than he isn't adjusted for going 0-16 against the red sox. Over the course of 600 at bats a player who hits .300 (180 hits) could raise his average to .341 if he had the identical season but added exactly one broken bat flare for a hit over each of the 25 weeks of the season.  Again, I get your point, but even Earl Weaver said, you can't run out the clock, you have to get 27 outs.  They all count.  
    • He needs to work on his transfer/release time. He takes to long to get rid of the ball after he gloves it. It's partly the hotdogging he got away with at third with a shorter throw to first. Teams have really scouted his slow release time and everyone is running all out when they hit what should be a routine grounder to short. The other day he barely threw out a catcher (McCann I think) on a routine grounder when he held the ball for an extra step. I think most things he will clear up, and he'll learn that he will have to play some hitters more shallow dispite how good he thinks his arm is
    • Looks like Willie Snead might end up being our get. That's better than BMarsh at this stage in his career, but not as nice as Dez would have been...
    • Well it will work out great if you make him co-GM with Brady.  
    • 6) Trade all your best prospects for Manny Machado. 
    • Fine.   Manny is hitting .412/.474/.471 in high leverage situations.    He’s also hitting well in medium and low leverage situations.    I’m glad he’s hot and hope he remains so.    He’s about the only player on the team who’s doing anything offensively.   
  • Popular Contributors

×