Jump to content

2/29/17 75th Anniversary of Korematsu v. United States Decision

Recommended Posts

On 23/2/2017 at 6:16 PM, Plutarch said:

Bigger counties (militaries) vs smaller countries (militaries) then yes, but they still must be in close proximity to each other.  Harder for Britain to reclaim the Faukland Islands from Argentina (recall that Argentina invaded the islands which were/are under British rule) today than it was 30+ years ago.  These days GB might just say that it's not worth the trouble to send an army half way around the world for some islands (keeping the Brits who live on the island safe is something else)

I agree

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/23/2017 at 5:23 PM, OFFNY said:




Scott, I specifically said the continental United States, which is the 48 states plus Washington, D.C.

In regard to invading Hawaii, while it is indeed a small island and not part of the geographically monstrous continental United States, it is part of the United States, so an attack on it would be an attack on the entire country ...... hence, no country that is even remotely in their right mind would do something like that. 

Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, but that was with the intent of destroying the United States' aircraft carriers and disabling their overall military might, that was not an invasion. The Japanese military  did not remain in  and occupy Hawaii, which is what would constitute an invasion. That was a calculated (and reasonable, in terms of military strategy) gamble and attack, not an invasion. 



Harry Turtledove wrote an interesting series of 2 or 3 books in an alternate history timeline where Japan did invade and occupy Hawaii after Pearl Harbor.   Pretty good read if that's your thing.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Rumors and News

  • Posts

    • It’s already so far out of touch, I doubt fans care if a player is making $20 mm/yr or $40 mm/yr.    They’re already in a whole other universe.   
    • First off, you were being condescending by making us sound like we were a no nothing blog, so stop with all of the hard-ache. Secondly, if you are in baseball and you don't take as many opinions as you can then I would look inward at yourself. Scouts outside the organization have zero to gain by down grading a player to us. The guys I talk to I've had relationships for years. They are an opinion to be added in with other opinions within the organization as well as our scouting. You are 100% correct that opinions are just that. I'm completely fine with anyone having a differing opinion than me, and I don't take offense at someone who says that they don't agree, but there is absolutely no need to disparage someone's opinion as being lesser because you don't agree. I've been doing this for 20 plus years. That doesn't make me infallible or never wrong, but I'll lay my process down against anyone including professional baseball people. That doesn't make me right, but it sure should mean I deserve a little respect and don't get called "blog pages ", whatever the heck that means. It doesn't matter what the team has in store. I feel his most likely outcome is a platoon outfielder because of his inability to hit lefties. Doesn't mean that he might not improve or a team might live with it and play him every day,   
    • That's a hell of a prediction.  These defenses font strike me as good enough for a game like that.   That said, I fully expect McCarthy to outcoach the ever loving hell out of Harbaugh.
    • 1965 = 4,658 / 1.77 1975 = 8,631 / 2.59 1985 = 16,823 / 5.66 1995 = 24,706 / 13.14 2013 = 44,888 / 23.89   Ref: http://roadsidephotos.sabr.org/baseball/earlyticketprices.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_Indexed_Monthly_Earnings
    • Hate this rule more than any other in baseball.
    • Must be traded during the season.  So next year Dan trades the pick to try and buoy a mediocre team.  The gambit fails but Dan tells us it's okay because they should have some picks coming from Manny and Jones walking.
    • Have to wonder where it ends? Huge supply of fans willing to spend their money, but how many more price increases are they willing to stomach before they just lose interest? Hard to re-ignite the flame once gone. I'm just guessing here, but it would seem to me that the price of a ticket and all the associated costs to attend pro sporting events has far outpaced the increase in wages in recent years (last 10-20 years?). Haven't done the research, just going off of gut feeling.
  • Popular Contributors