Jump to content

Drake DFA

Recommended Posts

Suitcase Simpson moved around a lot, but not five teams in the same season.  I believe Steve Pearce has played for all five AL East teams, but obviously not all in the same season.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:


Dave Kingman played for four teams in 1977.  






"Kong" was a big part of both New York teams' season that year.


In June, he (along with Tom Seaver) was part of the "Midnight Massacre", when both of their most prolific players were traded on the same day (June 15th.)


In late September he helped the Yankees hold off the Orioles and the Red Sox to claim the AL East title, although he was ineligible for the postseason roster because he was picked up after the August 31st cutoff date.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drake has moved again, this time back to Toronto.

4/14/17: DFA'd-- BAL->MIL
5/5/18: DFA'd-- MIL->CLE
5/26/18: DFA'd-- CLE->LAA
6/16/18: DFA'd-- LAA; outrighted
7/6/18: Selected-- LAA
7/23/18: DFA'd-- LAA->TOR
7/30/18: DFA'd-- TOR->MIN
11/2/18: DFA'd-- MIN->TBR
11/20/18: DFA'd-- TBR->TOR

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, weams said:



Drake only lasted a few weeks on the 40-man roster in Toronto, which claimed him off waivers from the Rays on Nov. 26. By now, the 31-year-old Drake is used to short-lived stints on major league rosters. Drake saw action with a record five teams (including the Blue Jays) in 2018, and has pitched for a total of seven clubs since debuting with the Orioles in 2015.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/5/2019 at 12:23 AM, Enjoy Terror said:


Drake claimed by Tampa Bay ........







The Rays wanted to make your post coincide with the OP's original thread title from March of 2017 ........ that was nice of them.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Orioles Information

Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores


Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports


2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats

  • Posts

    • I'd be genuinely thrilled to see Bleier at the ASG
    • You're just cherry picking the stats to prove your point.   
    • They're paying more-or-less Harper money for a player of similar age but who has Harper's one peak year almost every year.  Trout is #1 on the all time bb-ref WAR list through his age.  You can go down 50 or 75 spots below Trout and you have 80% of the players there as clear HOFers.   Trout's peers are Cobb, Mantle, Hornsby, ARod, Foxx, Ott, Griffey Jr, Speaker, Vaughn, Aaron, Frank... If you're not willing to pay going rates for Mike Trout, you would have also been willing to let any of those players walk because they were too risky.   Here's a list of players whose entire careers were worth less than Trout has been so far: Winfield, Ashburn, Billy Williams, Sliding Billy Hamilton, Lou Boudreau, Home Run Baker, Jesse Burkett, Harmon Killebrew, Mike Piazza, Vlad, Yogi, Hank Greenberg, Willie Stargell, Bill Dickey, Joe Medwick, Willie Keeler, George Sisler, Jimmy Collins, Elmer Flick.  There are nine Hall of Famers whose entire careers were worth less than half of Mike Trout's first eight seasons.
    • I love all the information available, especially on prospects. There's a great wealth of knowledge among everyone who contributes, and I appreciate that.
    • I agree with you that Beane and Moneyball was really influential...but it only sorta', kinda' worked.  2002 Stats: Hudson 238 IP ERA+145 Zito 229 IP ERA+ 158 Mulder 207 IP ERA+125 Lidle 192IP ERA+112 Zito and Mulder were first round draft picks. I didn't read the book, but I loved the movie. But I think the truth is that analytics had way, way, way less to do with the success of those teams than the hype would lead some to believe. If so, then the influence of the book on the spread of analytics may be more to do with hype and spin than an actual analysis of the effects of analytics. I find that fun.  It will be interesting to see how analytics are viewed in ten to fifteen years. I think in some cases the "success" of analytics on team wins could be luck much like how some scouts back in the day made a name for themselves by signing a player that turned out to be a great player. A big part of that is getting lucky with injuries, etc. I wonder if the same thing might be happening with some of the models that supposedly said pick player A over player B in a draft, etc. Only time will tell and maybe not even then (pretty soon everybody will be doing pretty much the same thing with analytics and there may be no relative advantages as it becomes part of the status quo).   
    • At least. The NFL cap is also complicated in that signing bonuses are prorated for each year of the contract (e.g. $20M bonus on a 4 year contract counts for $5M each year) and those prorated things come due right away when a player is traded or cut. So for example Joe Flacco was traded and the Ravens aren't paying him anything this year but he still counts $16M against the Ravens' cap this year. But also they just signed Earl Thomas, he'll get a $20M signing bonus and a $2M salary this year but he only counts $7M against the cap. Maybe it all sort of evens out but who knows.
    • No one cares.  Except us.  And we're not surprised.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

  • Create New...