Jump to content
BeeJ

Billy Beane Visits Athletics Nation

Recommended Posts

I found this to be an excellent read and thought a few of you would enjoy as well.

Beane: When was Moneyball published? What 2002, so that’s six years ago now and we’re still talking about it? I usually let Michael and others define what they thought what the book was about. The bottom line is that I don’t think there was anywhere in the book where we sat down and gave a manifesto on how to do things so I think that’s the most misinterpreted thing. But as far as how we do business in the draft, the more you do this job, and this can apply to almost any business job, the more you realize you don’t know. The idea that you are going to create a template that is going to work forever in a very competitive business just doesn’t happen. Are there some things we still believe in? Absolutely. There are also some things where we say, “Maybe we need to take a look at this.” But that’s the evolution of any business if you’re going to stay on top and try and be successful. I’m glad we’re like that. Maybe seven, eight, nine years ago I wouldn’t have been so much like that. Successes and failures are things you can learn from. For us, we’re constantly trying to evolve. Just because we do something different that we didn’t necessarily do a previous year doesn’t mean it’s something we don’t believe in. Someone will inevitably say that’s blasphemy compared to how we used to do business. We’re constantly checking ourselves. And the business is changing. The people running teams now, in my opinion, are as good as they ever have been. There are some really smart guys running businesses. It’s incredibly competitive and the idea that you’re going to have an “intellectual edge” anymore is, and I not sure that there ever was, but I’m not sure it exists any more. I can tell you the guys running teams now have some really, really smart guys working for them. You’re not going to outsmart too many people. We all have the same information available to us.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The goal was to restock the farm system and the second part, we didn’t really know. I wasn’t convinced that we were going to be a terrible team, which is what some people thought. I wasn’t also ready to run up a hill and say we were going to be the best team in the league either. We weren’t really sure. There were a lot of what ifs there that didn’t really allow us to get a gauge on where we were. I was looking forward to rebuilding this thing and making it really good for a long time, but it makes it a lot more pleasurable when you’re winning at the major league level. So you find yourself getting used to winning after a while and then when you lose a few games in a row, you have to remind yourself that you have a young team. Then you have to stop and appreciate where you’re at and what you’ve accomplished and be pretty happy.

Tell me that doesn't sound like something Andy MacPhail would say right now if he was asked the same question :P

Really good stuff. I think this answer is very true.

Number twos do everything the number one does, but the number one is the guy. It’s like when Stew (Dave Stewart) was here. We had Mike Moore and Dave Stewart and when you look at them it was hard to say who was actually better on the mound but Stew was number one and Mike was number two because of the presence factor and the cache. The number one label is based on presence. I’ll say this, there are a lot of guys down there who have the ability to be good number twos and threes. But we’ll just see if they have the cult of personality there after a couple of years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The goal was to restock the farm system and the second part, we didn’t really know. I wasn’t convinced that we were going to be a terrible team, which is what some people thought. I wasn’t also ready to run up a hill and say we were going to be the best team in the league either. We weren’t really sure. There were a lot of what ifs there that didn’t really allow us to get a gauge on where we were. I was looking forward to rebuilding this thing and making it really good for a long time, but it makes it a lot more pleasurable when you’re winning at the major league level. So you find yourself getting used to winning after a while and then when you lose a few games in a row, you have to remind yourself that you have a young team. Then you have to stop and appreciate where you’re at and what you’ve accomplished and be pretty happy.

I certainly understand Beane's point here, yet on a certain level it seems somewhat disconcerting to hear the guy in charge of assembling the team admitting that he really didn't have much of an idea about how good said team was going to be. :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[rant]So does every professional and collegiate team officially have its own "Nation" these days? GRRRRR[/rant]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I certainly understand Beane's point here, yet on a certain level it seems somewhat disconcerting to hear the guy in charge of assembling the team admitting that he really didn't have much of an idea about how good said team was going to be. :eek:

Why?

You think if you put Andy McPhail on sodium pentathol he wouldn't say the same thing?

Probably the guy who runs the Rays, too (blanking on his name).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[rant]So does every professional and collegiate team officially have its own "Nation" these days? GRRRRR[/rant]

Seriously. That drives me nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why?

You think if you put Andy McPhail on sodium pentathol he wouldn't say the same thing?

Probably the guy who runs the Rays, too (blanking on his name).

Just seems to me that the guy in charge ought to have a better grasp of the state of the club, and its competitive position.

By the same token I'd feel pretty uneasy if my VP of Sales could only shrug his shoulders if I asked him about the company's outlook for the next quarter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I certainly understand Beane's point here, yet on a certain level it seems somewhat disconcerting to hear the guy in charge of assembling the team admitting that he really didn't have much of an idea about how good said team was going to be. :eek:

I don't know why it's disconcerting for a GM to admit, basically, that he didn't really have a firm grasp on whether this team he'd just blown up and restocked was a 70-win team or an 85-win team. He'd probably still admit he's not quite sure where they'll finish.

Prediction in baseball is a fuzzy thing. I'm only half kidding every March or April when I say I'm confident the O's will finish with between 65 and 90 wins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know why it's disconcerting for a GM to admit, basically, that he didn't really have a firm grasp on whether this team he'd just blown up and restocked was a 70-win team or an 85-win team. He'd probably still admit he's not quite sure where they'll finish.

Prediction in baseball is a fuzzy thing. I'm only half kidding every March or April when I say I'm confident the O's will finish with between 65 and 90 wins.

JMHO, but if Beane was being completely honest, instead of saying "we didn't know," he'd be saying "we didn't expect this."

I totally understand why that's not what he's saying, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • You very clearly stated her value was her looks and not her intellectual contributions to the broadcast which probably says more about you than it does about her.  Best of luck to Sara. 
    • Hunter interviewed her on the radio pregame, and she said that she was not yet able to reveal what her next job would be but she would be soon. So this looks more like she is leaving for another opportunity then MASN getting rid of her.
    • Game 98, July 21 There were some excellent defensive plays in yesterday’s one hitter, four of which I’ll mention here. - With nobody out and a runner on 1st in the 6th inning, Chris Davis gloved a hard-hit ball over the bag, stepped on the edge facing home plate, took one more step towards home as he pivoted, and fired a strike to 2B that allowed Villar to apply the tag and complete a DP.  Davis has always been very good at feeds to 2B and this was a good example. - With Givens in the game in the 9th, Devers laced a rising liner to RF that Mancini went back on and almost misjudged it but he leaped and made a nice outstretched catch. - The next hitter hit a ball in the RCF gap but Wilkerson raced over and made a nice backhand catch while running pretty much full speed. - The final hitter of the game hit a ground ball in the 1B/2B hole, but Chris Davis made a diving stop and an accurate flip to Givens, who hustled over to cover 1B on the play.    The defense was in a RH pull shift, so Davis was about halfway between 1st and 2nd when he made the stop.    The stop, the accurate throw from his knees at that distance, and Given’s presence of mind to get to 1B on a ball hit that far towards 2B were all very impressive.    
    • Really?  That's incredible considering all the complete games pitchers got in the 70s.  Where did you discover this fact?
    • Impressive!    His breaking stuff had great late movement yesterday.    Still, he got away with some hard hit balls, especially in the later innings.    Hyde picked the right time to pull him.   
    • She did a good job.    It’s not rocket science, so I’m sure they’ll find a competent replacement.    It will be interesting to hear what her next gig is.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...