Jump to content
Frobby

Assume we don’t trade Manny and he walks

Recommended Posts

 

4 hours ago, FanSince88 said:

It would be worse if we signed him.  Whether or not we have Manny, the success of this team depends on whether we can somehow assemble a competent pitching staff.  Sinking $30+ million AAV into Manny for 10 years is seriously going to hobble the ability of this organization to maintain quality at other positions, especially including pitching. 

How many times in your life as an Orioles fan have you ever honestly said "Gee, if only we just had more HITTING, we would have definitely made the playoffs."  We all know the answer is zero.  It starts and it ends with pitching.  2014 happened because we had 5 solid starting pitchers on the staff who gave the team a chance to win every game, and an elite bullpen.  

Please someone make it stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the O's are being bad in 19 at all. Even without trading Manny.

Hays, Mancini, and Sisco, have to take the next steps and become legit hitters, unlike this current group of swing n' miss guys Duquette has brought in.

Manny needs to be dealt, plain and simple. I believe the O's could be fantastic in '19 with the right acquisitions. They need a Cobb/Chatwood now and trade Manny for another starter or at least one that can count on around the break, to be ready. Better yet, acquire 2 solid starters. Although, not sure Duquette knows what even ONE looks like.

Without dealing Manny, they haev to sign 2 quality starters and need about 6-7 total, including depth arms.

The kids and a rotation of Gausman, Bundy, Cobb, Vargas (I like Ross), Mixed bag. Harvey and another young starter for Manny coming, and 19' could shape up well.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/10/2017 at 9:27 PM, Aristotelian said:

Even if they hit on the draft pick it will be 4+ years minimum before that guy makes it to the big leagues and probably another 2-3 years before he replaced Manny's production. And it is far more likely that he becomes another Wieters/Matusz/Gausman/Hobgood somewhere in the range between bust and mediocre MLB player.

I don't disagree.  That's why I wanted him moved in July when it was obvious we were pretty much done as a 2017 contender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, twinedenter said:

I don't see the O's are being bad in 19 at all. Even without trading Manny.

Hays, Mancini, and Sisco, have to take the next steps and become legit hitters, unlike this current group of swing n' miss guys Duquette has brought in.

Manny needs to be dealt, plain and simple. I believe the O's could be fantastic in '19 with the right acquisitions. They need a Cobb/Chatwood now and trade Manny for another starter or at least one that can count on around the break, to be ready. Better yet, acquire 2 solid starters. Although, not sure Duquette knows what even ONE looks like.

Without dealing Manny, they haev to sign 2 quality starters and need about 6-7 total, including depth arms.

The kids and a rotation of Gausman, Bundy, Cobb, Vargas (I like Ross), Mixed bag. Harvey and another young starter for Manny coming, and 19' could shape up well.

 

 

 

 

Well I do agree with your  thinking. But it depends on who the GM is in 2019. I am hoping DD doesn't get an extension. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

The point is not what the Orioles could be without him, it's what they could be if they turn his value over into useful players for the next 5 years.

That might be the right course of action, but it’s not the premise of this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

Well I do agree with your  thinking. But it depends on who the GM is in 2019. I am hoping DD doesn't get an extension. 

If DD doesn't get extended whom ever else takes his place will be far worse. Nobody better would take the job under PA and if he signs some young up and comer, PA will give him no authority. The one exception would be if Buck becomes GM which is what I think will happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/10/2017 at 8:17 AM, Frobby said:

Does that mean we’re doomed to be a bad team for the next several years?

Sometimes I think we get too wrapped up in one player.    The O’s went 49-31 without Manny in 2014.   It’s never all about one player.

At the same time, the handling of Manny is symptomatic of how the organization has been run the last few years, and that’s not good.    It would take a lot of smart decisions to keep the O’s competitive over the next five years.   

Yes, I think the team will be bad for the next several years.

Machado is only one player but he accounts for so many wins.  Moreso, I don't think the team will be able to make other moves to compensate if he just walks.  In other words, they don't have to stink, but they will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/13/2017 at 5:58 PM, Tx Oriole said:

Well I do agree with your  thinking. But it depends on who the GM is in 2019. I am hoping DD doesn't get an extension. 

I cannot agree more. I am not sure I can take much more of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, twinedenter said:

I cannot agree more. I am not sure I can take much more of him.

Replacement, just for replacement sake, doesn't always produce solid results!!!!!

Look at the managers and GMs that rolled through here for two decades.

DD is far from perfect, but should be given some credit for winning baseball and playoff trip.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The constant calls to remove DD are scary.  He hasn't been perfect for sure, but lets remember that while he had a resume and the requisite experience for the job, he took the job after several notable candidates refused to even interview.  AM and DD together have moved the franchise from utter failure to respectability and competitiveness that was lacking for 14 years.  It really makes me nervous to think that Brady Anderson is being teed up to be the next GM.  If he is, I hope I am wrong.  I am more open to Buck moving upstairs, but pretty nervous about that as well.  

The bottom line is that if DD goes and Buck goes...Brady may well be the only one who will take the job.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



Rumors and News






  • Posts

    • It’s already so far out of touch, I doubt fans care if a player is making $20 mm/yr or $40 mm/yr.    They’re already in a whole other universe.   
    • First off, you were being condescending by making us sound like we were a no nothing blog, so stop with all of the hard-ache. Secondly, if you are in baseball and you don't take as many opinions as you can then I would look inward at yourself. Scouts outside the organization have zero to gain by down grading a player to us. The guys I talk to I've had relationships for years. They are an opinion to be added in with other opinions within the organization as well as our scouting. You are 100% correct that opinions are just that. I'm completely fine with anyone having a differing opinion than me, and I don't take offense at someone who says that they don't agree, but there is absolutely no need to disparage someone's opinion as being lesser because you don't agree. I've been doing this for 20 plus years. That doesn't make me infallible or never wrong, but I'll lay my process down against anyone including professional baseball people. That doesn't make me right, but it sure should mean I deserve a little respect and don't get called "blog pages ", whatever the heck that means. It doesn't matter what the team has in store. I feel his most likely outcome is a platoon outfielder because of his inability to hit lefties. Doesn't mean that he might not improve or a team might live with it and play him every day,   
    • That's a hell of a prediction.  These defenses font strike me as good enough for a game like that.   That said, I fully expect McCarthy to outcoach the ever loving hell out of Harbaugh.
    • 1965 = 4,658 / 1.77 1975 = 8,631 / 2.59 1985 = 16,823 / 5.66 1995 = 24,706 / 13.14 2013 = 44,888 / 23.89   Ref: http://roadsidephotos.sabr.org/baseball/earlyticketprices.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_Indexed_Monthly_Earnings
    • Hate this rule more than any other in baseball.
    • Must be traded during the season.  So next year Dan trades the pick to try and buoy a mediocre team.  The gambit fails but Dan tells us it's okay because they should have some picks coming from Manny and Jones walking.
    • Have to wonder where it ends? Huge supply of fans willing to spend their money, but how many more price increases are they willing to stomach before they just lose interest? Hard to re-ignite the flame once gone. I'm just guessing here, but it would seem to me that the price of a ticket and all the associated costs to attend pro sporting events has far outpaced the increase in wages in recent years (last 10-20 years?). Haven't done the research, just going off of gut feeling.
  • Popular Contributors

×