Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Leaving the ACC for the Big 10, in hindsight

Has your opinion of leaving the ACC for the Big 10 changed?  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Has your opinion of Maryland leaving the ACC for the Big 10 changed?

    • Yes - I was against the move, but now I like it
    • No - I was against the move and still am
    • Yes - I was for the move but don’t like it now
    • No - I was for the move and still like it


Recommended Posts

I’m just curious to know if people’s opinion of Maryland leaving the ACC for the Big 10 has changed over the last four years.    Thoughts?   Poll above.  

PS — I put this in the basketball forum, but your answer doesn’t have to be limited to that.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Voted for the 2nd option, but honestly I think a better response would be "didn't like it then, don't care now".  Because the ACC as I knew it is dead. I still think it was a panic move to help the finances in the short term.  Football-wise the Big 10 is more interesting, but basketball-wise it is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Option two for me as well, I really miss the ACC rivalries.  Especially when Duke came to town.  But, I can say I don't mind missing this years MD team get embarrassed by Duke and NC as they most certainly would have....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, murph said:

Option two for me as well, I really miss the ACC rivalries.  Especially when Duke came to town.  But, I can say I don't mind missing this years MD team get embarrassed by Duke and NC as they most certainly would have....

So you would rather get embarrassed on the football field than the Hardwood?  :P

62-14 is pretty bad, 66-3 is even worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

So you would rather get embarrassed on the football field than the Hardwood?  :P

62-14 is pretty bad, 66-3 is even worse.

For me it is not an issue, not remotely a college football fan at all.  Also cannot watch the NBA either.   Baseball, Tennis and College basketball.   Nothing else matters.   :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, murph said:

For me it is not an issue, not remotely a college football fan at all.  Also cannot watch the NBA either.   Baseball, Tennis and College basketball.   Nothing else matters.   :D

You forgot Curling.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking as someone who was first a Duke fan (having graduated from there) and second a Maryland fan (having grown up in the state and still living there), I really miss having Maryland in the ACC.    The rivalries just aren’t there in the Big 10 and most of the schools are too far away. 

I agree with Glenn_Davis, though, that the ACC isn’t as fun as it was when it was an 8 or 9 team conference and teams played home and away against every other league team.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked the last option. At first I was disappointed UMd was leaving the ACC but, after a day of thinking about/rationalizing it, was glad they were leaving the all-carolina conference. No more feeling like they're being snubbed, getting the short end of the stick, and taken for granted. I thought it was an opportunity to improve football and still do despite the division drubbings. The football team is on the right path, and I'm confident it will show soon. The talent on their roster is about the best I can recall it ever being. The basketball team has had several good and entertaining years, but hit the injury bug this year, handicapping them. They should be fine going forward.

After saying all that, the jury is really still out to me but I'm glad they're out of the ACC. Note: I've been a fan of the school's athletics for 41 years.  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should just shut football and men's basketball down.   Stick to sports where players aren't getting paid.   I was for move at first now against it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Initially against the move. Yow ran the department into the ground financially. The school needed the money. ACC is not the same conference. Pitt is our rival? Would see Dook and Carolina every other year at home.  B1G money will be a big help to athletics when it finally arrives. I fear football will be a disaster. Best we can hope for is Minn, Northwestern like teams. 6-6 a good season with an occasional 7-5, and some other bowl game than Pinstripe Bowl or Military Bowl. Don't get drubbed by more than 25 a couple of times a year. Hoops, we should be top 3 in conference or better, and make NCAA tourney 3 times in a 4 year stretch. Need a President who cares about athletics or things will not improve.  Why AD on sabbatical for 6 months? Just not good. We are just an after thought athletically in this conference. ACC reffing bad?  See any b-ball game when we are playing an old time B!G team and the game is close and we need a loss. Been a fan since the last time we beat State Penn at home. I'm afraid apathy is setting into the picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was for the move at the time and am still for it. As  OldNewGuy said, Yow ran the program into the ground financially. They needed the money and the ACC everyone loved was not the same. I think when people think of leaving the ACC, they just think of how it used to be. But that's not the ACC now even if MD had stayed. Everything changed when BC joined the ACC. Playing BC, Syracuse, Virginia Tech,  Pitt, and Miami wasn't the ACC and that's who MD had to play before they left. Unless we can get into a time machine and go back to the ACC of 2004, I'm still fine with MD having  taken the money to leave.

As far as football and basketball, the teams just have to get better. Moving conferences didn't make them get worse. They've just suffered through bad coaching. I like what Durkin is doing with football, but it takes more time to improve a football team. The basketball team would be better if Turgeon could coach half as well as he could recruit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was fine with the move then, and fine with the move now. 
The rivalries and such would be better in the ACC.  But you had to move to where the money is.  The Big Ten guarantees stability and a chance to keep up financially with the powerhouses to some extent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Me neither. I think I understand Elias's overall plan and the decisions not to promote our best prospects yet, as painful as the consequences may be at around 9 or 10 pm on many nights and on Sunday afternoons.  But where is the organization on Sisco? Despite his unimpressive performance in ML two call-ups, I don't think anyone questions that his offensive potential should earn him a long look at hitting major league pitching but for the doubts as to whether he will be able to catch major league pitching well enough to be the receiver (even a backup) on an Oriole team that's striving to improve and move toward contention. Sisco has been in the Orioles system since 2013. He has had five full seasons, and parts of two others, in which he's played over 400 MiL games, and 65 with the Orioles, all of them at catcher (plus a few games DHing). He's 24 and should be entering his prime years, and catchers often wear down and wear out faster than other position players. It seems to me that should be plenty of time to decide whether Sisco is or isn't going to be good enough defensively to be a major league catcher. (Even if the answer is yes, the Orioles might regard him as only good enough defensively to hold down the position for a couple of years while the team stinks, but should be thought of as keeping the catcher's box warm for Adley Rutschman or someone else we haven't yet heard of.) I have read a lot of comments about whether Sisco is or isn't improving defensively, or whether that's a hopeless task. I'm pretty sure there have been no steps taken to try Sisco at a less challenging position to get his bat in the lineup (third base would seem to be the logical choice, and there's not exactly a talent logjam there), but I don't know whether that means Elias has decided Chance can be the catcher on an improving team or is just letting the experiment  continue.  If someone out there has some information or insight on the Elias regime's views of Sisco's defense and future, I'd really like to hear about it.        
    • One of my favorites.  Really made me sad to see him end up in Boston.
    • Yeah, injuries derailed Loewen as well. As you mentioned, the expectations on our end as fans were just unreasonable.  That why depth is so important, because the odds are that most of these guys aren't going to work out.  It's also why I'm really following Means closely, because if he turns into even a back-end rotation starter that's a huge development.  You need some of these "out-of-nowhere" guys as well.
    • Well, you brought up a few moments of stupidity.  I feel like there are more.   If the goal is to get this team trained up and developed, part of that has to be situational awareness and having your players know what to do.  
    • 16,457 last night. Thank God for Yankee fans. 😀 Probably a little more tonight. Thursday should be one of the bigger crowds of the year.
    • The thing is Bordick is pretty honest when I have heard him on the radio not doing a broadcast. He gets with Hunter and they turn into the Lollypop Club.Also do they get paid on how many times an inning they mention Hyde and the coaches.Hyde loves their resilience. Hyde let them read the Bob Feller plaque about hard work and a long season.The players before the game are working hard with the coaches People don't realize the effort they put in.They watch videos and the coach who works with the catchers is the best.As opposed to the prior bench coach who worked with the catchers who was the best Not sure why other teams have coaches who dont coach.This coaching thing and managing are only done in Baltimore. 
    • Torres wants us to have the #1 pick in 2020.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...