Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OFFNY

2018 Chicago Cubs

Recommended Posts

o

 

 

(APRIL 28th)

 

MILWAUKEE BREWERS

Lorenzo Cain (R) CF

Christian Yelich (L) LF

Ryan Braun (R) 1B

Domingo Santana (R) RF

Hernan Perez (R) 3B

Jonathan Villar (S) 2B

Manny Pina (R) C

Orlando Arcia (R) SS

Junior José Guerra Maurera - RHP )) (2-0, 0.56 ERA) ) *

 

* )) Leads the Major Leagues in Winning Percentage (1.000)

 

CHICAGO CUBS

Reinaldo Albert Almora, Jr. - CF

Javier Baez - SS

Kris Bryant - 3B

Anthony Rizzo - 1B

Willson Contreras - C

Kyle Schwarber - LF

Ben Zobrist - 2B

Jason Heyward - RF

Jose Guillermo Quintana - LHP )) (2-1, 7.78 ERA)

 

http://www.baseballpress.com/lineups

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

Although yesterday's game against the Brewers for the NL East title was technically not a playoff game, the Cubs essentially lost 2 consecutive postseason games against 2 different teams ........ I believe that that is the first time in modern baseball history (1901 - Present) that that has happened.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Although yesterday's game against the Brewers for the NL East title was technically not a playoff game, the Cubs essentially lost 2 consecutive postseason games against 2 different teams ........ I believe that that is the first time in modern baseball history (1901 - Present) that that has happened.

 

o

In fairness, it was literally impossible for that to happen for most of that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another anomaly from the Cubs.  I heard that Terrance Gore, in his major league career (regular season) has more stolen bases than official at-bats.  Another Herb Washington 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Although yesterday's game against the Brewers for the NL East title was technically not a playoff game, the Cubs essentially lost 2 consecutive postseason games against 2 different teams ........ I believe that that is the first time in modern baseball history (1901 - Present) that that has happened.

 

o

 

 

4 hours ago, Number5 said:

 

In fairness, it was literally impossible for that to happen for most of that time.

 

o

 

Yes, that's why I pointed it out.

It's still extremely difficult for that to happen ........ for starters, a team needs to be in the precise position that the Cubs were in for it to occur. If their one-game playoff would have been for a Wildcard spot instead of the division title, it would not be possible for it to happen.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

o

 

Yes, that's why I pointed it out.

It's still extremely difficult for that to happen ........ for starters, a team needs to be in the precise position that the Cubs were in for it to occur. If their one-game playoff would have been for a Wildcard spot instead of the division title, it would not be possible for it to happen.

 

o

My point was that it was only possible to happen in the years with a one-game wild card playoff game, or since 2012.  The years 1901 thru 2011 were irrelevant, since it was impossible in those years.  In other words, we really can't say that it is all that much of an oddity even though it is the first time it ever happened, as there have only been six seasons in which it could possibly have happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

o

 

Yes, that's why I pointed it out.

It's still extremely difficult for that to happen ........ for starters, a team needs to be in the precise position that the Cubs were in for it to occur. If their one-game playoff would have been for a Wildcard spot instead of the division title, it would not be possible for it to happen.

 

o

 

 

10 hours ago, Number5 said:

 

My point was that it was only possible to happen in the years with a one-game wild card playoff game, or since 2012.  The years 1901 thru 2011 were irrelevant, since it was impossible in those years.  In other words, we really can't say that it is all that much of an oddity even though it is the first time it ever happened, as there have only been six seasons in which it could possibly have happened.

 

o

 

I know what your point was, and I agreed with it.

I find it interesting because something like that could not happen for more than 100 years, and now it can (and finally has) happened.

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

Kris Bryant turned down an offer of apparently 200+M, though the years were not mentioned.

You probably dodged a bullet there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, weams said:

Ok then! Enjoy him. 

I'm just curious to why you don't think it will work out. Obviously this year wasn't great as his shoulder injury held him back a great deal, but he still put up 2.3fWAR after 3 years of 6.1, 7.9 and 6.7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I'm just curious to why you don't think it will work out. Obviously this year wasn't great as his shoulder injury held him back a great deal, but he still put up 2.3fWAR after 3 years of 6.1, 7.9 and 6.7.

Like I said. You have him while you have him. Maybe he'll bounce back fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • I'd be genuinely thrilled to see Bleier at the ASG
    • You're just cherry picking the stats to prove your point.   
    • They're paying more-or-less Harper money for a player of similar age but who has Harper's one peak year almost every year.  Trout is #1 on the all time bb-ref WAR list through his age.  You can go down 50 or 75 spots below Trout and you have 80% of the players there as clear HOFers.   Trout's peers are Cobb, Mantle, Hornsby, ARod, Foxx, Ott, Griffey Jr, Speaker, Vaughn, Aaron, Frank... If you're not willing to pay going rates for Mike Trout, you would have also been willing to let any of those players walk because they were too risky.   Here's a list of players whose entire careers were worth less than Trout has been so far: Winfield, Ashburn, Billy Williams, Sliding Billy Hamilton, Lou Boudreau, Home Run Baker, Jesse Burkett, Harmon Killebrew, Mike Piazza, Vlad, Yogi, Hank Greenberg, Willie Stargell, Bill Dickey, Joe Medwick, Willie Keeler, George Sisler, Jimmy Collins, Elmer Flick.  There are nine Hall of Famers whose entire careers were worth less than half of Mike Trout's first eight seasons.
    • I love all the information available, especially on prospects. There's a great wealth of knowledge among everyone who contributes, and I appreciate that.
    • I agree with you that Beane and Moneyball was really influential...but it only sorta', kinda' worked.  2002 Stats: Hudson 238 IP ERA+145 Zito 229 IP ERA+ 158 Mulder 207 IP ERA+125 Lidle 192IP ERA+112 Zito and Mulder were first round draft picks. I didn't read the book, but I loved the movie. But I think the truth is that analytics had way, way, way less to do with the success of those teams than the hype would lead some to believe. If so, then the influence of the book on the spread of analytics may be more to do with hype and spin than an actual analysis of the effects of analytics. I find that fun.  It will be interesting to see how analytics are viewed in ten to fifteen years. I think in some cases the "success" of analytics on team wins could be luck much like how some scouts back in the day made a name for themselves by signing a player that turned out to be a great player. A big part of that is getting lucky with injuries, etc. I wonder if the same thing might be happening with some of the models that supposedly said pick player A over player B in a draft, etc. Only time will tell and maybe not even then (pretty soon everybody will be doing pretty much the same thing with analytics and there may be no relative advantages as it becomes part of the status quo).   
    • At least. The NFL cap is also complicated in that signing bonuses are prorated for each year of the contract (e.g. $20M bonus on a 4 year contract counts for $5M each year) and those prorated things come due right away when a player is traded or cut. So for example Joe Flacco was traded and the Ravens aren't paying him anything this year but he still counts $16M against the Ravens' cap this year. But also they just signed Earl Thomas, he'll get a $20M signing bonus and a $2M salary this year but he only counts $7M against the cap. Maybe it all sort of evens out but who knows.
    • No one cares.  Except us.  And we're not surprised.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...