Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Elbren

Perriman Still Here, Receives Roster Bonus

Recommended Posts

Soooooo, is there a reason for this?

 

We signed three WR's in free agency.  They are all but guaranteed the top three spots.  We also took two WR's in the draft.  What does that give us, twelve WR's on the roster?  Yes, we can easily cut some of them, but I still don't see why we should have kept Perriman.  We're talking about a guy that caught 10 passes last year and 33 passes the year before ... and that was before we brought in five WR's.  The bonus is "only" $650k, but his current cap hit is $2.7 Mil.  Are we really going to waste almost $3 Mil. in cap space on a guy that most likely never touches the field?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.  They must see something in Perriman that gives them hope he can turn it around.  3 mil in cap space does sounds like a useful chunk of change that can be better applied elsewhere.  Perhaps they are grooming him as the kick returner this season?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/10/2018 at 10:13 AM, Camden_yardbird said:

That catch he made from RGIII flashed his talent.  Don't know if he will make it but worth finding out.  Moore looked good too.

That was against a 4/5th string corner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perriman for Warmack.  Philly doesn't need him and he's probably the best backup guard you could get.  Philly could use an extra WR with Jeffrey out.

I loved Warmack coming out of college and he never quite reached that potential but could still contribute.  Absolute unit of a human being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Perriman for Warmack.  Philly doesn't need him and he's probably the best backup guard you could get.  Philly could use an extra WR with Jeffrey out.

I loved Warmack coming out of college and he never quite reached that potential but could still contribute.  Absolute unit of a human being.

That would be great but the Eagles have a lot of depth at WR even with Jeffrey out for a couple of games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Thought this guy deserves a thread after being pretty dominant so far... 4 shutout innings as a starter today gives him 8 scoreless innings at GCL so far. no walks and 6 K’s on the year leaves him.038 whip. so 0.00 ERA and .038 whip after 3 games. GCL shut out the GCL Red Sox today 2-0
    • What reasoning are you using to come to that conclusion?  He didn't in AAA, by 82 points of OPS.  He didn't in AA by 168 points.  He didn't in high A by 44 points.  Why would he in the majors?
    • So the two guys the orioles got back in the cashner trade have to be on the new list of 25 DSL prospects to watch. I would also assume that the Prado kid has to be our top DSL prospect right now based on his age and performance. 
    • Well, we'd still be contractually obligated to pay him, but I won't pretend there are differences.  And I do base part of that comment on the fact that I doubt others will try him out as a reclamation attempt.  If I were Davis, I wouldn't try another team if cut loose.  Well, hopefully Hyde does get decisions with the lineup and Elias gives him the 40 man.  I'd like to think they talk a bit, but if I were Hyde, I'd play the same game.  I'm not saying Elias is sabotaging the team on a level that others would.  My only point is cutting him doesn't really net anything at this point.
    • Go through an objective checklist.  Women's soccer today is a lot more like 1800s or early 1900s baseball than it is today's major leagues.  Small crowds, small salaries, leagues folding, limited history, teams playing in essentially community parks.   Just the salaries are a big indicator - the max individual salary for the league is $46k, and this is one of if not the top league in the world.  I have administrative assistants who make more than stars in the NWSL. The minimum salary is $16k - you can make that working fast food.  I'd guarantee you players have dropped out of the league because they can't make any money.  The talent pool expands and contracts with salary, and $46k isn't buying much talent.  The USWNT players make a lot more, the rank and file make the kind of salary you get as a starting elementary school teacher in Alabama. In 1871 many of the best players in the world were in the National Association.  It was the best baseball league in the world.  But objectively the NA is a low-level minor league compared to today. You can wish and want that today's NWSL is a high-level pro league.  But it simply is not.  Objectively it's on par with the BaySox or the Baltimore Blast.  It's a minor league paying minor league salaries, playing in front of minor league crowds, and on shaky financial footing.  
    • I agree, I'm just not expecting much of a return. Just dump his salary because Duquette should never have taken it on in the first place. The idea that we'd be able to flip a very flawed player like Villar for something of value was never made sense to me. 
    • I cherry picked the lowest year exactly because that was the lowest point once they got all the dead weight off the books.  To me that makes perfect sense.  As to your figure or my figure, I've recently mentioned that payroll estimates vary, I wasn't being duplicitous I was just using. http://www.stevetheump.com/Payrolls.htm That site had the Astros at $22,062,600 in 2013.  If the number isn't accurate, sorry but it certainly wasn't intentional.   My point is that the O's payroll in a similar spot in the rebuild is significantly higher than what the Astros had, that is true even accounting for payroll inflation.  I think that the higher starting point means we should not expect the Orioles to follow the same payroll expansion the Astros had.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...