Jump to content
Philip

Maybe too soon to ask about Mike Wright

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

The first part is correct, although over a large enough sample, the luck part diminishes.

I do want to point out that it's not a new cutter, he threw it all last year with lackluster results. It may be a slightly altered cutter, but not new.  

Statcast still called it a slider, but looking at the velocity and movement it was more of a cutter. I would say at times it got much much depth at times and was definitely a slider. Really the only different between a slider and cutter is the amount of depth and break.

Either way, it was a pitch that had a batter K rate but still got hit hard because he's not consistent with the pitch. Just like what I saw yesterday. 

But he's more confident now.... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mayor McCheese said:

Haven't we seen enough of Mike Wright already... I mean we know what he is.  He is a career 5.75 ERA pitcher, He BABIP was .344 which umm stinks.  He walks too many guys and can't get groundballs. 

 

 

With just a slight improvement, Wright could have better numbers than Cobb, Cashner, and Bundy. It wouldn't take much. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was more like the Wright we know.

Couple observations from last night:

-Walked the first batter. Tsk tsk. 

-Good to see the 4 seamer continue to reappear and have life at 94mph. He needs this pitch. Maybe just not up in the zone against Judge. 

-The cutter is hit or miss. 

-He has no breaking ball to speak of. It was basically 4seamer, cutter, 4seamer, cutter all night. Occasional slider. I don't know how he expects to be a starting pitcher without an out pitch or at least a third pitch.

-He's just a mess on the mound. No composure, jumping all over the place, spinning around, breathing hard - and this is all in the first inning! Looked much better with this earlier in the spring but clearly under the lights against big teams he can't really control his energy. Not that it's bad to be high-energy, but I dunno. If I'm a defender watching my guy pitch, he doesn't give me confidence with the way he looks on the mound. IMO.  

-Means came on and, while he did give up a couple runs as well, just seemed more in control of the game overall. The difference seemed stark to me. 

 

I've liked Wright's spring and I'm intrigued on his comments that some of the analytics have helped him. Ultimately, though, he seems like a long or middle reliever to me. The numbers in spring support that. He still gives up too many hits, he still doesn't have great command, still doesn't have an out pitch. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, interloper said:

-He's just a mess on the mound. No composure, jumping all over the place, spinning around, breathing hard - and this is all in the first inning! Looked much better with this earlier in the spring but clearly under the lights against big teams he can't really control his energy. Not that it's bad to be high-energy, but I dunno. If I'm a defender watching my guy pitch, he doesn't give me confidence with the way he looks on the mound. IMO.  

He needs to start talking to the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, interloper said:

Well that was more like the Wright we know.

Couple observations from last night:

-Walked the first batter. Tsk tsk. 

-Good to see the 4 seamer continue to reappear and have life at 94mph. He needs this pitch. Maybe just not up in the zone against Judge. 

-The cutter is hit or miss. 

-He has no breaking ball to speak of. It was basically 4seamer, cutter, 4seamer, cutter all night. Occasional slider. I don't know how he expects to be a starting pitcher without an out pitch or at least a third pitch.

-He's just a mess on the mound. No composure, jumping all over the place, spinning around, breathing hard - and this is all in the first inning! Looked much better with this earlier in the spring but clearly under the lights against big teams he can't really control his energy. Not that it's bad to be high-energy, but I dunno. If I'm a defender watching my guy pitch, he doesn't give me confidence with the way he looks on the mound. IMO.  

-Means came on and, while he did give up a couple runs as well, just seemed more in control of the game overall. The difference seemed stark to me. 

 

I've liked Wright's spring and I'm intrigued on his comments that some of the analytics have helped him. Ultimately, though, he seems like a long or middle reliever to me. The numbers in spring support that. He still gives up too many hits, he still doesn't have great command, still doesn't have an out pitch. 

The points about his composure lead me to believe he wouldn't be such a great reliever.   Maybe a mop-up type of guy, but definitely not someone you'd want in an important role.   Perhaps in a reliever role, he can focus on only a couple of pitches and make himself valuable.   I just don't see it.

I just think it's time to cut bait with him.   He might catch on with another organization and thrive.   I don't think it's going to happen here.   He may just be one of those "change of scenery" guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

The points about his composure lead me to believe he wouldn't be such a great reliever.   Maybe a mop-up type of guy, but definitely not someone you'd want in an important role.   Perhaps in a reliever role, he can focus on only a couple of pitches and make himself valuable.   I just don't see it.

I just think it's time to cut bait with him.   He might catch on with another organization and thrive.   I don't think it's going to happen here.   He may just be one of those "change of scenery" guys.

Like Arrietta!

 

 

 


Tony, I'm sorry, I couldn't help it.🤣

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, in all fairness.... if he was shutting everyone down and lighting it up out there, I wouldn't be talking about his composure. I'd probably be raving about his energy on the mound. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

The points about his composure lead me to believe he wouldn't be such a great reliever.   Maybe a mop-up type of guy, but definitely not someone you'd want in an important role.   Perhaps in a reliever role, he can focus on only a couple of pitches and make himself valuable.   I just don't see it.

I just think it's time to cut bait with him.   He might catch on with another organization and thrive.   I don't think it's going to happen here.   He may just be one of those "change of scenery" guys.

The scenery has been about as changed as it could be — new GM, new manager, new pitching coach, increased availability of analytic data, etc.   I don’t think the scenery is the issue.    That said, just like I didn’t overreact to 10 scoreless innings, I’m not going nuts over one bad outing, either.    He still may be one of our 12 best major league-ready pitchers, even if he’s well below average by major league standards.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The scenery has been about as changed as it could be — new GM, new manager, new pitching coach, increased availability of analytic data, etc.   I don’t think the scenery is the issue.    That said, just like I didn’t overreact to 10 scoreless innings, I’m not going nuts over one bad outing, either.    He still may be one of our 12 best major league-ready pitchers, even if he’s well below average by major league standards.    

It wasn't even a bad outing.

He walked the first batter then gave up a home run. He then only scattered a few hits after that, never in a row. Got a double play to end an inning and struck out Judge his second time around.

He didn't walk anyone else and didn't give up another extra base hit. 

People are acting like he was pulling a "Dylan Bundy" here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

I just think it's time to cut bait with him.   He might catch on with another organization and thrive.   I don't think it's going to happen here.   He may just be one of those "change of scenery" guys.

In a vacuum, I'd agree. I think the O's may actually value having a guy on the ML roster who can hold some of the younger guys back, even if he's not good. Guys like Kremer and Akin will likely need more time in the minors. I hope they can work on their craft without the pressure of needing a ML arm.

Now if we can find 12 guys who can passably fill out our staff, and maybe a couple of decent depth guys in AAA, sure, I'm open to moving on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

It wasn't even a bad outing.

He walked the first batter then gave up a home run. He then only scattered a few hits after that, never in a row. Got a double play to end an inning and struck out Judge his second time around.

He didn't walk anyone else and didn't give up another extra base hit. 

People are acting like he was pulling a "Dylan Bundy" here. 

He also threw about 70 pitches in less than 3 IP. 

To be clear I never said it was a bad outing, I just said it looked like the usual Mike Wright kind of thing. I even praised his fastball!

I agree with Frobby that Wright is probably deserving of being on the roster to start the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, interloper said:

He also threw about 70 pitches in less than 3 IP. 

To be clear I never said it was a bad outing, I just said it looked like the usual Mike Wright kind of thing. I even praised his fastball!

I agree with Frobby that Wright is probably deserving of being on the roster to start the season.

I'll take 70 in 3 innings from a long reliever, if he holds a team like he did.

Maybe he needs to embrace his head issues and become a character, like the Mad Hungarian did.

Would make things more entertaining.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The scenery has been about as changed as it could be — new GM, new manager, new pitching coach, increased availability of analytic data, etc.   I don’t think the scenery is the issue.    That said, just like I didn’t overreact to 10 scoreless innings, I’m not going nuts over one bad outing, either.    He still may be one of our 12 best major league-ready pitchers, even if he’s well below average by major league standards.    

I think the issue is that if this guy gets flustered every time he gets knocked around, he's likely not going to last.   He could have looked at the success he's had over those 10 scoreless innings and just shake off a bad outing.    It doesn't sound like he's maturing in that regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have more optimism in the O's getting 4/5 innings out of Mike Wright than I do from Dylan Bundy

More an indictment of Bundy than praise of Wright I suppose.

Bottom line this starting rotation is going to be historically bad... and Mike Wright will fit in nicely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

I have more optimism in the O's getting 4/5 innings out of Mike Wright than I do from Dylan Bundy

More an indictment of Bundy than praise of Wright I suppose.

Bottom line this starting rotation is going to be historically bad... and Mike Wright will fit in nicely

I’d love to rebut you, but after watching Bundy post a 5.45 ERA last year (7.61 his last 15 starts) and the way he’s looked this spring, I can’t.   I do think Bundy has way more upside than Wright, but I’m not at all confident he’s going to be significantly better than last year, based on what we’ve seen so far this spring.   Hope I’m wrong.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • 😅 🦄Richie Martin: FIRST BIG FLY BABAAAAAYYYY. Get 'em Richie. And off CC no less. Tacked on another single while he was at it.    Renato Nunez: Smacked a curveball into the CF seats for a 2-run shot. Got them back in the game. Alas, it was not enough to spur a rally. He did walk in this one, too, which is probably a good sign for that slump.    Hanser Alberto: RBI double. Hanser's line against LHP? .426/.426/.617/1.043  😳   Gabriel Ynoa: I'll give him some credit for pitching 2.1 and giving up just the 1 ER. It's an improvement based on his recent games. The team really needs him to give some quality long relief innings, and this basically counts. Not ready to give up on Ynoa yet.    🦄Branden Kline: Nice outing! He hit 98! Branden is hanging in there at the ML level and that's great. Maybe one of the more underrated good things to happen on the team this year. He still needs more innings before we can make a call, but he tossed 1.2 scoreless innings in this one against a potent lineup, and got 2 Ks. You know what? Unicorn for Branden.    Shawn Armstrong: LOL Mariners. It never gets old. 0.96 ERA since coming over.    Brandon Hyde: Proved he is not just Mr. Positivity. Did not mince words after this one. I would normally say Straily should be worried, but Hyde repeated that this is what they got. But he's not going to sit there and brush it all off - he voiced some displeasure and I applaud that. It's getting silly out there.    Mike Elias: Great interview recently which, if you've been feeling a little beat down lately, should provide some pep in your step. The win-loss record is what it is, but good things are percolating in the minors and in the front office. Stay the course!   Errors: 0   Yankees: Didn't score the last 4 innings of this one, at least. 
    • OK so let's ask the unspoken question that Elias will never openly admit to. Stewart started his ML clock last September, playing in 17 games. Taking that into account, how much longer does he need to stay down in Norfolk for us to get the extra year?     It shouldn't be much longer right?
    • One of BP's eyewitness guys ventured a "looks like Jered Weaver" comp on him, and tagged his windup as slow and deliberate, not that TTTP is as much of an organizational priority anymore.
    • If you told me my CF played elite defense, hit 25 dingers and had 40 SB I would say that's pretty spectacular.  List the guys who have done that in the last ten years. That said, I think he could end up being a weak version of a player Elias had in Hou, Jake Marisnick.
    • At the end of the day, you will most likely be disappointed with whatever the actual result is in the next signing period. I don't say that as a slight to you, really, just that there will still be a disparity between what actually occurs in their first actual year of entering this market and what we envision is possible. But whatever they do, it looks like it will clearly be the MOST they've done EVER. It doesn't mean it will be effective in terms of that turning into ML talent. But the progress toward that goal will be noteworthy, and their international efforts should only improve from that point on. 
    • When I talk to people about this who dont think it's a problem I always ask them if they are a parent, and what they would think if their son/daughter and a friend came home with a test.  The test is a ten question test and the friend got 7/10 questions right while their son/daughter got 8/10.  However when asked what the grade is the son/daughter got a B while the friend got an A.  That's major league baseball. And the analogy usually works to show people the absurdity of what has been deemed a competitively balanced system. Large market teams simply can make more mistakes and end up with better results. The Boston Redsox won the WS last year with over $80 million in dead money (Sandoval, Craig, Rusney Castillo).  That was more dead money than 4 teams were paying their entire payroll.
    • They only play the Yankees 8 more times all year, so that will help them not make it to 115 losses.  Hopefully they will have some opponents over the rest of the year that don't intimidate them as easily as the Yankees do.  Just imagine how badly New York would be beating the Os if they actually had even a reasonably healthy team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...