Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Smilin' Joe Fission

Any A10 Fans Here?

Recommended Posts

I just discovered this section of the forums.  I definitely expected there to be a lot of Terp fans, but was wondering who else we have here.  I've been so wrapped up in the college season I haven't paid much attention to the O's offseason and spring training so far.  Sad this is the last week of the regular season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

I remember when the Temple Owls handed my beloved North Carolina Tar Heels their heads IN CHAPEL HILL, on national television when Marc Macon was a freshman in the 1987-88 season.

Temple eventually became the #1 team in the country going into the NCAA tournament that season, and made it to the Elite Eight before being upset by Duke. Danny Ferry was a junior that season, and they beat North Carolina 3 times that year ........ twice in the regular season, and a 3rd time in the ACC championship game.

 

The following season in 1988-89, Temple was not quite as good, although I believe that they were robbed in the conference semifinals against Rutgers when a Scarlet Knights player missed the front end of a one-and-one in the waning moments of the 2nd half, but Temple was called for a lane violation. Given a second chance, the Rutgers shooter then made the next 2 free throws, Temple lost the game, and were subsequently left out of the NCAA tournament while riding the bubble. Rutgers then beat Penn State in the A-10 championship game, claiming their first NCAA bid since 1983.

 

In 1990, Temple won their conference tournament to secure an NCAA tournament berth, and lost their first game.

 

In 1991, the Owls came full circle ........ Marc Macon, who was a freshman phenom on the juggernaut 1987-88 team, was now a senior ........ and once again, they made the Elite Eight of the tournament that season. Macon missed a 3-point field goal attempt at the buzzer that would have sent the game into overtime, and Temple once again fell one game short of reaching the Final Four.

 

I remember the 1993 Temple team, because they lost to UMASS 3 times that year (just like North Carolina lost 3 times to Duke in 1988) ........ however, they again made it all the way to the Elite Eight while UMASS went home after losing in the 2nd round.

 

The Owls made it to the Elite Eight twice more in 1999 and 2001, giving them 5 such distinctions in coach John Chaney's tenure ........ an incredible feat to me, considering that he was coaching a Mid-Major.

 

I'm always more impressed when the Mid-Majors make a deep run into the NCAA tournament that when perennial powerhouses do, such as North Carolina, Duke, UCLA, Marquette, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Georgetown, Syracuse, etc. If you are coaching at one of those perennial powerhouses, half of your recruiting is essentially done for you ........ you don't have to do much convincing to the top-50 or top-100 high school seniors to come to such places, because with their rich histories, that is what almost all of them dream of since they started playing the game. At the Mid-Majors, you basically have to accept that you are not going to get any of those players (with perhaps a very few rare exceptions), and simply take the best of what is left over. So to me, a Mid-Major making it to the Sweet Sixteen is essentially the equivalent of the perennial powerhouses making it to the Final Four. And when a George Mason or a Virginia Commonwealth make it to the Final Four, that is (to me) the equivalent of the perennial powerhouses winning a national championship. 

 

All these years later since the period in which I cited (1988 through 2001), some of the "Mid-Major vs. Major" picture is more blurred than it was at that time ........ you have Majors like Gonzaga playing in a Mid-Major conference in the WCC  ........ and you have teams like Butler, a Mid-Major whom is playing in a Major conference in the Big East, although with their back-to-back trips to the national championship game fairly recently, they are almost a Major themselves (like Gonzaga, a former Mid-Major who  played themselves into being a bonafide Major over the last 2 decades.) And then you have conferences which are kind of a mix between Majors and Mid-Majors, like the American Athletic Conference.

Hence, I don't believe that fans of Mid-Majors should feel insulted when being referred to as such ........ in fact, I see it as quite the opposite. Because of the fact that the Majors have almost all of the advantages in the recruiting of the top high school seniors, teams like John Chaney's Temple Owls, the 2005-06 George Mason team, and the 2010-11 VCU team ought to wear that title/categorization proudly as a badge of honor, as they stood toe-to-toe with the big boys while at a significant disadvantage.

 

o

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Can you give us a reference about where the evidence is for how "very few left handed pitchers threw 91 back in the late 70s"?     Maybe my statistical search is not looking in the same place.     Yeah, the junk baller who won our last World Series game probably ever.    Just watch the video and honestly tell me you think this guy couldn't pitch today.     
    • So few left handed pitchers threw 91 back in the late 70's that I just find it unlikely from a statistical standpoint.  I'm not old enough to remember late 70's McGregor.  The guy I remember in the 80's was more of a junkballer.
    • At the same time, you cited 103 mph as the reason older generation hitters would not do well today.  Exaggeration goes both ways in making a point about which I too was trying to communicate...i.e.  I do believe that many 1980s era players could certainly play well and thrive in today's game.     And that some of the pitching skill sets today might even be more valuable in today's game than they were back then.   Even if the velocity is not the same.         I certainly accept that the game is played differently today, different after the steroid era, and that the athletes playing it perform those aspects of the game differently than their predecessors.   Still haven't found the speed gun ratings on Scott in high school, but I suspect they were pretty good....I might just ask him...   Scott McGregor, El Segundo (Calif.), 1972 Although a teammate of Hall of Famer George Brett (as a sophomore and junior), it was McGregor who garnered more headlines during his three-year career under El Segundo legendary coach John Stevenson. McGregor was a three-time All-CIF selection and was twice named Player of the Year. He was also a Rawlings All-American as a senior. He set section records (which still stand) for career wins (51), career shutouts (20), shutouts in a season (9), and consecutive no-hitters (2). He also set the section record for career strikeouts (which has since been broken) with 496. He was the No. 14 overall pick in 1972 draft by the Yankees, but he was eventually traded to Baltimore. 
    • He's the top, He's the Colosseum! He's the top, A cornerstone of the Te-am! -- Pole Courter, from the musical "Anything Counts"  
    • You asked about velocity right? I love how you keep mentioning inner circle HoF players.  No word on how Frank Torre would do.  By concentrating on the top .1% you are missing out on an important issue I tried to relay to you.  Your average hitter is a lot more dangerous.   
    • And I think that’s fair. I’m just saying that I think it’s quite possible he would get that bump in today’s game given the emphasis on K’s from a pitching standpoint and hitter’s aggression and willingness to strike out.  It’s definitely a different game though. 
    • Yeah, I am sure Frank Robinson and Hank Aaron would have been just terrified by Kevin Gausman and Tommy Hunter.....lol.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...