Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
AceKing

Two Feet and Robotic Umps....

Recommended Posts

Not sure if I missed a thread on this, but these crazy rules are Actually Happening this year, in the Atlantic League.

Robotic Umps.

No mound visits.

3 batter minimum.

Moving the pitching rubber back TWO FEET

Abolishing the SHIFT

Bigger Bases

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/03/mlb-announces-agreement-to-experiment-on-rule-changes-in-independent-atlantic-league.html#comment-1518227

 

This should be fun to watch, whether you are a fan of these crazy rules or not.  They are moving the Mound back 2 feet after the All Star break, so they can see the direct effect of 62’6” pitches.  (Should have a great effect on pitch movement, etc.)

I think I want Robotic Umps...

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!

May as well contribute 2 cents to the debate:

Robotic Umps... Yay! Why not let them see what we see, or get out of the way altogether.

No mound visits... Hmm, I think at least catcher conferences to clarify or change signs, settle the pitcher, etc. should stay part of the game.

3 batter minimum... Okay, why not. Will have the biggest impact on pace of game.

Moving the pitching rubber back TWO FEET... Seems radical, but the rationale makes sense--every couple of decades, to compensate for increased FB velocity.

Abolishing the SHIFT... Yep, the way it's s'posed to be.

Bigger Bases... Seems an overreaction... just because of Manny?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shift shouldn't be abolished. You as a player and team are supposed to DO BETTER. So sick of the wussification of the world. Don't like the shift? Don't hit the ball where the 6 million people are. All the other stuff is just fluff and won't improve the game, in my opinion. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should make the bases softer not bigger.  There have been more issues with them being rock hard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, AceKing said:

Not sure if I missed a thread on this, but these crazy rules are Actually Happening this year, in the Atlantic League.

Robotic Umps.

No mound visits.

3 batter minimum.

Moving the pitching rubber back TWO FEET

Abolishing the SHIFT

Bigger Bases

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/03/mlb-announces-agreement-to-experiment-on-rule-changes-in-independent-atlantic-league.html#comment-1518227

 

This should be fun to watch, whether you are a fan of these crazy rules or not.  They are moving the Mound back 2 feet after the All Star break, so they can see the direct effect of 62’6” pitches.  (Should have a great effect on pitch movement, etc.)

I think I want Robotic Umps...

So yeah, some of these ideas are interesting and worth investigation (other than moving the mound back which is dumb), but by implementing them all at once you cloud any type of usable data you'd get about the effect on pace of play, run environment, etc. 

Also, a little off topic, but I hear all the time people saying that young people don't like baseball and the solution is less HR and Ks and more balls in play. But I haven't heard any kid say anything like that, kids love big velocity and moonshots. What kids want is more personality in the game, more swagger, and probably less people complaining about the state of the game in broadcasts. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

So yeah, some of these ideas are interesting and worth investigation (other than moving the mound back which is dumb), but by implementing them all at once you cloud any type of usable data you'd get about the effect on pace of play, run environment, etc. 

Also, a little off topic, but I hear all the time people saying that young people don't like baseball and the solution is less HR and Ks and more balls in play. But I haven't heard any kid say anything like that, kids love big velocity and moonshots. What kids want is more personality in the game, more swagger, and probably less people complaining about the state of the game in broadcasts. 

Too many K’s make them less special.  Also more ball should in play gives you more opportunities for spectacular plays.   I agree with your point re reducing home runs.  

On doing this all at once not making sense, part of doing so is probably to encourage fans to come out to the games by promoting all the differences. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

So yeah, some of these ideas are interesting and worth investigation (other than moving the mound back which is dumb), but by implementing them all at once you cloud any type of usable data you'd get about the effect on pace of play, run environment, etc. 

Also, a little off topic, but I hear all the time people saying that young people don't like baseball and the solution is less HR and Ks and more balls in play. But I haven't heard any kid say anything like that, kids love big velocity and moonshots. What kids want is more personality in the game, more swagger, and probably less people complaining about the state of the game in broadcasts. 

Agreed! There is a reason Ken Griffey Jr. was basically the face of the MLB in the 90's when it came to promotions and stuff. Aside from being a great player, he had a personality and it was built up. Who doesn't remember watching him hit dingers with his hat turned backwards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, AceKing said:

Not sure if I missed a thread on this, but these crazy rules are Actually Happening this year, in the Atlantic League.

Robotic Umps.

No mound visits.

3 batter minimum.

Moving the pitching rubber back TWO FEET

Abolishing the SHIFT

Bigger Bases

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/03/mlb-announces-agreement-to-experiment-on-rule-changes-in-independent-atlantic-league.html#comment-1518227

 

This should be fun to watch, whether you are a fan of these crazy rules or not.  They are moving the Mound back 2 feet after the All Star break, so they can see the direct effect of 62’6” pitches.  (Should have a great effect on pitch movement, etc.)

I think I want Robotic Umps...

I sure don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Agreed! There is a reason Ken Griffey Jr. was basically the face of the MLB in the 90's when it came to promotions and stuff. Aside from being a great player, he had a personality and it was built up. Who doesn't remember watching him hit dingers with his hat turned backwards?

Pretty sure that never happened, except in batting practice.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rule changes are stupid. The entire game of baseball has been based But more than that they aren’t productive. The problem isn’t length of game(and pitch clocks have been shown to have no effect on game length anyway) but excitement. We need more baserunners. 60’6””. 90’. Sheesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tx Oriole said:

I sure don't.

I don’t either. Besides, the umpires union would burn down stadiums if the attempt were made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tx Oriole said:

I sure don't.

I’d be in favor of robot umpires, if it’s proven that they’re significantly more accurate than humans.     I hate seeing a really terrible call in a key situation, or certain players who always get the benefit of the doubt.    

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Philip said:

I don’t either. Besides, the umpires union would burn down stadiums if the attempt were made.

I just wish they'd leave the game alone. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • I missed the last inning. Did Sucre provide demonstrative encouragement and critiques of his own pitches?
    • DJ Stewart should be up. He looked good last season and he is a better outfielder than Mancini.  Really I don't think management has a clue about baseball.
    • o   Hess held it together for 4 shutout innings before the White Sox got to him in the 5th.     15 OUTS: ) 5 Flyouts, 3 Strikeouts, 3 Groundouts, 2 Foulout, 2 Lineouts   DAVID JAMES HESS  ))))))) (FINAL NUMBERS) IP:ll5 H:lll 5 ))(1 Home Run, 1 Double, 3 Singles) R:llll 4 BB:ll2 SO:ll3 Pitches: )l 76) (47 )Strikes, )29 )Balls) 2019 ERA: )l 5.88  )  26.00 IP  (17 ER) 2019 WHIP: )l 1.231  )  26.00 IP  (32 H/BB) 2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )l .250  )  (25 for 100)   PITCHES BY INNING ******************* 10 ll(71 llStrikes, lll31 lllBalls) 14 ll(91 llStrikes, lll51 lllBalls) 15 ll(91 llStrikes, lll61 lllBalls) 51 ll(31 llStrikes, lll21 lllBalls) 32 ll(19 llStrikes, l13 llllllBalls)   o
    • They miss Wieters behind the plate.
    • o   Hess held it together for 4 shutout innings before the White Sox got to him in the 5th.     15 OUTS: ) 5 Flyouts, 3 Strikeouts, 3 Groundouts, 2 Foulout, 2 Lineouts   DAVID JAMES HESS  ))))))) (vs. WHITE SOX, 4/22) IP:ll5 H:lll 5 ))(1 Home Run, 1 Double, 3 Singles) R:llll 4 BB:ll2 SO:ll3 Pitches: )l 76) (47 )Strikes, )29 )Balls) 2019 ERA: )l 5.88  )  26.00 IP  (17 ER) 2019 WHIP: )l 1.231  )  26.00 IP  (32 H/BB) 2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )l .250  )  (25 for 100)   PITCHES BY INNING ******************* 10 ll(71 llStrikes, lll31 lllBalls) 14 ll(91 llStrikes, lll51 lllBalls) 15 ll(91 llStrikes, lll61 lllBalls) 51 ll(31 llStrikes, lll21 lllBalls) 32 ll(19 llStrikes, l13 llllllBalls)   o
    • No pitchers with elite stuff, track record of performance, and desirable delivery/measurables. I think Lodolo is probably the top pitcher, I like him better than Singer last year, but doesn’t really have TOR upside, he’s 92-95 lefty with sink, slider, curveball, change. Throws strikes, lots of GBs, avg command. Slider is a new pitch and gives him a chance to miss more bats. Other potential top pitchers drafted are Alek Manoah who is an extra large human, 93-98, plus slider, developing change, has had command and consistency problems but has really improved as the season has progressed. Was pretty much projected as a reliever at the beginning of the year, but has shook that label.  Jackson Rutledge who is a JUCO guy with command issues but a huge frame and huge stuff, he’s t100, he’s kind of a Nate Pearson clone.  Zach Thompson who is a lefty who  was kind of falling down draft boards until he sat 94-96 this past weekend with a plus curveball. His stuff is so inconsistent, it’d be a hard sell for me before 20 overall. George Kirby who doesn’t have anything plus, but is polished, with a bunch of average to 55 grade pitches and potential above average command. Then my favorite, Seth Johnson, who has a best mechanics of them all IMO, converted SS, has pitched one year since middle school. 91-96 t98, plus slider, high spin curveball, change. Poor pitch-ability and below average command, but like I said he’s literally just started pitching. He could be 4 plus pitches with successful development. The lack of track record could be viewed as a plus or a minus.  Those are the top college arms, the high school class has depth but doesn’t have anyone I’d be excited about taking in the top 15 overall.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...