Jump to content
Tony-OH

TT: Opening Day roster starting to take shape, but questions remain

Recommended Posts

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, Stewart is a bad body athlete.  Doesn't look like he should be able to move like he can, but he does.  

I'm glad there are some tough decisions to be made this spring.  

It sure beats last year. Can’t wait to see much more athleticism on the field, especially as the year progresses.  

Really hope Martin shines defensively. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t understand playing Santander Opening Day over Stewart unless they see something they really think is real with Santander. He did nothing at AA last year. I know they tweaked some mechanics with his swing but still. 

They need to give Mullins a real long look before they move him off CF. 

 

12 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think Santander was hurt a lot last year.  I've never been a big Stewart fan but I still think RF is up for grabs.  Until Diaz is ready or they put Hays there.  

Correct. Knee injury and an infection. Think he missed a month or 2.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

It sure beats last year. Can’t wait to see much more athleticism on the field, especially as the year progresses.  

Really hope Martin shines defensively. 

All reports are that Martin has been looking good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think Mullins is the OD CF.  I think Hays gets sent to the minors (wildcard has a stroke) and Mullins gets whatever amount of time to show if he can hack it or not in CF until the time comes to call up Hays when they're done playing the clock game.  

Is that a wish or a prediction?

This is not rocket science.   One guy is hitting for a 500 OPS the other for 1.000.   Mullins goes down, figures out how to hit lefties and comes back a stronger players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I am not saying Stewart is anything special but he is older and has played a full year at AAA. Just think this is his time.  

Maybe last September was Stewart's time and now his time is over.  Stewart was a long shot to make the team as more than a 4th OF (but he's defensively limited too).  Really poor pick by the O's, IMO.  Shouldn't pick a player who has to make a lot of changes to have a chance as a regular player in the first round. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Is that a wish or a prediction?

This is not rocket science.   One guy is hitting for a 500 OPS the other for 1.000.   Mullins goes down, figures out how to hit lefties and comes back a stronger players.

Mullins might not ever figure out how to hit lefties.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Maybe last September was Stewart's time and now his time is over.  Stewart was a long shot to make the team as more than a 4th OF (but he's defensively limited too).  Really poor pick by the O's, IMO.  Shouldn't pick a player who has to make a lot of changes to have a chance as a regular player in the first round. 

He put up half a win in 40 at bats!

He was the only thing worth watching last September.

890 OPS, 143 OPS+.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He put up half a win in 40 at bats!

He was the only thing worth watching last September.

890 OPS, 143 OPS+.

Hasn’t done terribly this spring, either.    But it looks to me as if the Orioles are hoping to be a little more athletic.    

I don’t put that much weight on who makes the OD roster.    If Stewart performs well at Norfolk, he’ll get more chances.    And if other guys who make the roster initially don’t perform well, they can easily be sent back down.   Tons of flexibility there.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Is that a wish or a prediction?

This is not rocket science.   One guy is hitting for a 500 OPS the other for 1.000.   Mullins goes down, figures out how to hit lefties and comes back a stronger players.

It’s spring training. 

Why would you want their best defender in CF learning in the minors?  He has experience. He isn’t 21 years old. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hasn’t done terribly this spring, either.    But it looks to me as if the Orioles are hoping to be a little more athletic.    

I don’t put that much weight on who makes the OD roster.    If Stewart performs well at Norfolk, he’ll get more chances.    And if other guys who make the roster initially don’t perform well, they can easily be sent back down.   Tons of flexibility there.   

It will definitely be easier to find room for Stewart when Davis and Trumbo are gone. Elias wants to get away from having a roster full of unathleletic players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hasn’t done terribly this spring, either.    But it looks to me as if the Orioles are hoping to be a little more athletic.    

I don’t put that much weight on who makes the OD roster.    If Stewart performs well at Norfolk, he’ll get more chances.    And if other guys who make the roster initially don’t perform well, they can easily be sent back down.   Tons of flexibility there.   

If it’s Hays over Stewart than he is a better glove. 

I know Stewart does not have the arm for RF but Santander isn’t more athletic than Stewart.  

Stewart may get more chances, no doubt. That said, this isn’t a good sign for him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Is that a wish or a prediction?

This is not rocket science.   One guy is hitting for a 500 OPS the other for 1.000.   Mullins goes down, figures out how to hit lefties and comes back a stronger players.

It's a prediction, chill.  Take a joke.

In theory, I agree with you but I don't think that's going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's a prediction, chill.  Take a joke.

In theory, I agree with you but I don't think that's going to happen.

I'm laughing, are you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I'm multitasking.
    • I'm here too, logged in as DJ Stewart's number one fan on the board. I like the guys who don't look like athletes.
    • Here's bad news: I'm watching. 
    • Looks like it's just me and you here, @eddie83
    • So I had a grand theory all ready to explain modern baseball, based on the impact of the information revolution on defense.  According to the theory, better data has allowed teams to better measure individual defense and the contribution of defense to run prevention, which has led to increased emphasis on defensive ability in personnel decisions.  Better data has also led to shifts and other improvements in defensive positioning.  All of these factors have led in theory to improved defensive efficiency--an increase in the percentage of balls in play that are converted into outs.  In turn, this has led to a change in optimal offensive strategies.  If it's harder to get hits on balls in play, then it is less likely that you will be able to score runs by stringing a bunch of singles together, or by using small ball tactics like base stealing, the hit and run and the sacrifice.  Teams thus optimally put more emphasis on power in personnel decisions, because a home run is the one way to score runs that can't be stopped by good defense. Great theory, huh?  Then I looked at the data.  Here are the numbers for aggregate defensive efficiency for MLB since 2001: 2001:  0.691     2002:  0.695   2003:  0.694   2004:  0.691   2005:  0.693   2006:  0.687   2007:  0.686   2008:  0.689 2009:  0.690   2010:  0.691   2011:  0.694    2012:  0.691   2013:  0.692   2014:  0.690    2015:  0.689    2016: 0.688 2017:  0.688    2018:  0.691 So twenty years into the defensive revolution, we have...the same defensive efficiency that we had in 2001.  Teams on the whole are doing no better today at converting balls in play into outs than they were in 2001, despite all of the shifts and all of the zone ratings and other defensive measures that are now available.   So much for my theory.  Some earlier posts suggest another theory--improved pitch design and velocity have made it harder to hit for contact, which increases strikeouts and reduces batting average.  In turn this leads to a greater emphasis on power at the expense of contact, increasing home runs, further increasing strikeouts and further reducing batting average.  That theory may be correct, but it's less obvious to me that the correct strategic response to improved pitch design and velocity is to sacrifice contact for power. It could go the other way--in response to better pitching, it is even more important to hit for contact, to put the ball in play, to sustain an offense.  It would take a model simulation to determine whether the optimal response to power pitching is to emphasize power hitting.   Or it could just be a juiced ball!  
    • Two out walk no damage. I say Orioles win 8-2 tonight.  
    • Holy hell Soler is having himself a season.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...