Jump to content
Tony-OH

TT: Opening Day roster starting to take shape, but questions remain

Recommended Posts

Again, contract aside....what has Chris Davis done to justify a spot on the ML roster?

I do not think he has earned it.  I believe, keeping him on the roster will actually hinder the growth and development of the team moving forward.  It's not about losing a certain number of games, its about figuring out who can play and who cannot.

Wasting a roster spot for Arajuo for 17 days makes sense.  I do not think Davis is on the opening day roster.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, foxfield said:

Again, contract aside....what has Chris Davis done to justify a spot on the ML roster?

I do not think he has earned it.  I believe, keeping him on the roster will actually hinder the growth and development of the team moving forward.  It's not about losing a certain number of games, its about figuring out who can play and who cannot.

Wasting a roster spot for Arajuo for 17 days makes sense.  I do not think Davis is on the opening day roster.

Wish not but do I do not see ownership swallowing all the millions owed to Davis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jammer7 said:

Alberto and Phillips could be the two most vulnerable, but I wouldn’t keep Escobar. He’s a defensive liability now. Find some video on his throws this spring, it’s bad.

Alberto is out of options and likely not going to make this team. Phillips likely will not get claimed, and if he does, no big loss. Guys with his profile are available all the time. 

Wilkerson and Dwight Smith would likely be claimed, but I think they are the next two. 

Haven’t really seen too much of Escobar in ST. 

As for the Phillips vs Arajuo debate. Phillips is actually 14 months younger and pitched a full season in AAA with a sub 2.00 ERA. 

I just don’t see the point in keeping Arajuo when he’s the 40th man on the 40 man roster. He has no business being on the 40 man, let alone the MLB roster for 15 games. Arajuo was a good dart throw that Buck thought he saw something. No harm, no foul. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Haven’t really seen too much of Escobar in ST. 

As for the Phillips vs Arajuo debate. Phillips is actually 14 months younger and pitched a full season in AAA with a sub 2.00 ERA. 

I just don’t see the point in keeping Arajuo when he’s the 40th man on the 40 man roster. He has no business being on the 40 man, let alone the MLB roster for 15 games. Arajuo was a good dart throw that Buck thought he saw something. No harm, no foul. 

If someone told you that Araujo could be a solid ML set up guy in 2-3 years, would you keep him for the first 17 days? Because if they can get him to be more consistent with his mechanics, that’s his likely role to me. Take a closer look at Pedro’s stats, particularly his splits. And remember, Buck burned this kid last year. He was very solid in April, then was overused. He was a victim of awful roster management and the dysfunction that was Duquette vs. Buck. There is some good quality in his profile, and for 17 days of roster time, it’s worth it to find out if he can be the guy he should be. https://www.mlb.com/player/pedro-araujo-606478?stats=splits-r-pitching-mlb&year=2018

Phillips’ stats in a little more than half a season at AAA we’re solid. He was up with Atlanta some as well in 2018. His stuff is not that impressive for a MLB reliever. Some ups and downs, overall, he’s unspectacular for me. I do not see him having a ceiling of a higher leverage reliever, but a middle innings eater/journeyman AAAA type. He’s about the same as a Ryan Meisinger type for me. https://www.mlb.com/player/evan-phillips-623465?stats=career-r-pitching-minors&year=2019

Personally, I keep Araujo around and DFA Phillips if I need space on the roster. Araujo has some swing and miss stuff, when his mechanics are right and there is more upside than for Phillips. But I respect your thoughts. Different strokes. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait until the day before opening day and DFA  Alberto and Smith.  I think they both make it through waivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, foxfield said:

Again, contract aside....what has Chris Davis done to justify a spot on the ML roster?

I do not think he has earned it.  I believe, keeping him on the roster will actually hinder the growth and development of the team moving forward.  It's not about losing a certain number of games, its about figuring out who can play and who cannot.

Wasting a roster spot for Arajuo for 17 days makes sense.  I do not think Davis is on the opening day roster.

You don't think the O's would give Davis at least a couple of months of regular season AB to determine if the changes he/they have implemented with him have helped? If you believe that ST results don't really matter, then you can't keep Davis off of the 25-man based on those results. 

Changes take time. Will they work? No, probably not! But you don't know for sure until he's collected at least 100-150 ABs. Not to mention Elias has already mentioned that if Davis' changes don't result in improvements, he will intervene to try and change him more. So that implies not only will Davis be given time to right himself at the beginning of the season, he will be given even more time after that  to implement whatever changes Elias and Co. come up with. 

If that fails, then and only then will he be released. IMO. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, foxfield said:

Again, contract aside....what has Chris Davis done to justify a spot on the ML roster?

I do not think he has earned it.  I believe, keeping him on the roster will actually hinder the growth and development of the team moving forward.  It's not about losing a certain number of games, its about figuring out who can play and who cannot.

Wasting a roster spot for Arajuo for 17 days makes sense.  I do not think Davis is on the opening day roster.

There’s no such thing as “contract aside.”    The O’s will spend some time trying to resurrect Chris Davis precisely because they have to pay him $92 mm.     I’m a big advocate of not chasing after sunk costs, but for $92 mm you have to be 100% sure that cost is completely sunk.    My guess is it takes a couple of months to go from 95% sure to 100%.     

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s no such thing as “contract aside.”    The O’s will spend some time trying to resurrect Chris Davis precisely because they have to pay him $92 mm.     I’m a big advocate of not chasing after sunk costs, but for $92 mm you have to be 100% sure that cost is completely sunk.    My guess is it takes a couple of months to go from 95% sure to 100%.     

I agree. As much as I want Davis off this roster, I'd be pleasantly surprised of Elias was allowed to eat the albatross of a contract. I just don't see that happening. Now if Davis is hitting .148 on May 30th, maybe that's enough.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

Wish not but do I do not see ownership swallowing all the millions owed to Davis.

It’s going to happen. Now or in the future. It’s like an overripe avocado. I guess you could hope for it to get better. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weams said:

It’s going to happen. Now or in the future. It’s like an overripe avocado. I guess you could hope for it to get better. 

An overripe avocado isn't going to get better.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

An overripe avocado isn't going to get better.

There are hopers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s no such thing as “contract aside.”    The O’s will spend some time trying to resurrect Chris Davis precisely because they have to pay him $92 mm.     I’m a big advocate of not chasing after sunk costs, but for $92 mm you have to be 100% sure that cost is completely sunk.    My guess is it takes a couple of months to go from 95% sure to 100%.     

This is a nice succinct way of putting it. If you're the O's, you better be dang sure. And you want to say you did your due diligence. It's Niiiiiineeetttyy twooooo millliiooonnnnnnnnn Unittteeddd Statteessss dooolllaaarrrsss. Lol. 

That's a lot of scratch! You don't want to be wrong about it based on ST ABs. Especially when the 2019 games don't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And we all realize that Davis will be why we do not sign FAs for the next 20 years. Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will even move my original potential "CD release date" (ayyy) from next season up to the the AS break of this season. 

I am willing to compromise!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I'm multitasking.
    • I'm here too, logged in as DJ Stewart's number one fan on the board. I like the guys who don't look like athletes.
    • Here's bad news: I'm watching. 
    • Looks like it's just me and you here, @eddie83
    • So I had a grand theory all ready to explain modern baseball, based on the impact of the information revolution on defense.  According to the theory, better data has allowed teams to better measure individual defense and the contribution of defense to run prevention, which has led to increased emphasis on defensive ability in personnel decisions.  Better data has also led to shifts and other improvements in defensive positioning.  All of these factors have led in theory to improved defensive efficiency--an increase in the percentage of balls in play that are converted into outs.  In turn, this has led to a change in optimal offensive strategies.  If it's harder to get hits on balls in play, then it is less likely that you will be able to score runs by stringing a bunch of singles together, or by using small ball tactics like base stealing, the hit and run and the sacrifice.  Teams thus optimally put more emphasis on power in personnel decisions, because a home run is the one way to score runs that can't be stopped by good defense. Great theory, huh?  Then I looked at the data.  Here are the numbers for aggregate defensive efficiency for MLB since 2001: 2001:  0.691     2002:  0.695   2003:  0.694   2004:  0.691   2005:  0.693   2006:  0.687   2007:  0.686   2008:  0.689 2009:  0.690   2010:  0.691   2011:  0.694    2012:  0.691   2013:  0.692   2014:  0.690    2015:  0.689    2016: 0.688 2017:  0.688    2018:  0.691 So twenty years into the defensive revolution, we have...the same defensive efficiency that we had in 2001.  Teams on the whole are doing no better today at converting balls in play into outs than they were in 2001, despite all of the shifts and all of the zone ratings and other defensive measures that are now available.   So much for my theory.  Some earlier posts suggest another theory--improved pitch design and velocity have made it harder to hit for contact, which increases strikeouts and reduces batting average.  In turn this leads to a greater emphasis on power at the expense of contact, increasing home runs, further increasing strikeouts and further reducing batting average.  That theory may be correct, but it's less obvious to me that the correct strategic response to improved pitch design and velocity is to sacrifice contact for power. It could go the other way--in response to better pitching, it is even more important to hit for contact, to put the ball in play, to sustain an offense.  It would take a model simulation to determine whether the optimal response to power pitching is to emphasize power hitting.   Or it could just be a juiced ball!  
    • Two out walk no damage. I say Orioles win 8-2 tonight.  
    • Holy hell Soler is having himself a season.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...