Jump to content
Roy Firestone

Hard to keep Hays out of this lineup

Recommended Posts

By far their best young player this spring. They shouldn't hold him back for arbitration clock...they should just let him play...5th HR today....He is healthy and looking good.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I don't know about you...but he's one player I WANT to see...more than almost anyone else...

 

 

Him, Diaz and Mountcastle for me.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I don't know about you...but he's one player I WANT to see...more than almost anyone else...

 

 

With the spring he is having, I agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Roy. I am going to be upset if he isn't one of the starters on opening day. His spring performance reminds me of Nick's spring performance several years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they were going to do that they would have sent him down with Diaz.

Also if you want to do that with Hays he has to stay down longer since he was up in 2017.

How long would it be?

Arguably, the better he plays, the higher the value of that extra year.

I would not be opposed either way. It is great to see Hays performing at a high level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

How long would it be?

Arguably, the better he plays, the higher the value of that extra year.

I would not be opposed either way. It is great to see Hays performing at a high level.

Seven weeks or so.

Of course that would still make him a super 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Arguably, the better he plays, the higher the value of that extra year.

 

If he's good, he's going to be expensive no matter what.  

I understand the service clock manipulation game.  I have to think that if I were an MLB GM, I'd play that game, too.  

That doesn't mean I think the rule is stupid.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

If he's good, he's going to be expensive no matter what.  

I understand the service clock manipulation game.  I have to think that if I were an MLB GM, I'd play that game, too.  

That doesn't mean I think the rule is stupid.  

giphy.gif

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

If he's good, he's going to be expensive no matter what.  

I understand the service clock manipulation game.  I have to think that if I were an MLB GM, I'd play that game, too.  

That doesn't mean I think the rule is stupid.  

I object to the term "manipulation". Nothing manipulative about playing by the rules as agreed to by the MLBPA. Encouraging players to stay with their teams another year and delaying free agency is not a bad thing.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

I object to the term "manipulation". Nothing manipulative about playing by the rules as agreed to by the MLBPA. Encouraging players to stay with their teams another year and delaying free agency is not a bad thing.

I object to you objecting to the term manipulation.  The term covers what is occurring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aristotelian said:

I object to the term "manipulation". Nothing manipulative about playing by the rules as agreed to by the MLBPA. Encouraging players to stay with their teams another year and delaying free agency is not a bad thing.

Everyone is so sensitive all of a sudden.    If you send a player to the minors solely to save service time, you are manipulating his service time.    Plain and simple.    It’s not against the rules, and it doesn’t have to be in order to be manipulation.   

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I object to the term "manipulation". Nothing manipulative about playing by the rules as agreed to by the MLBPA. Encouraging players to stay with their teams another year and delaying free agency is not a bad thing.

Object all you want about the language being used, doesn't change the actions of what's going on.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Can you give us a reference about where the evidence is for how "very few left handed pitchers threw 91 back in the late 70s"?     Maybe my statistical search is not looking in the same place.     Yeah, the junk baller who won our last World Series game probably ever.    Just watch the video and honestly tell me you think this guy couldn't pitch today.     
    • So few left handed pitchers threw 91 back in the late 70's that I just find it unlikely from a statistical standpoint.  I'm not old enough to remember late 70's McGregor.  The guy I remember in the 80's was more of a junkballer.
    • At the same time, you cited 103 mph as the reason older generation hitters would not do well today.  Exaggeration goes both ways in making a point about which I too was trying to communicate...i.e.  I do believe that many 1980s era players could certainly play well and thrive in today's game.     And that some of the pitching skill sets today might even be more valuable in today's game than they were back then.   Even if the velocity is not the same.         I certainly accept that the game is played differently today, different after the steroid era, and that the athletes playing it perform those aspects of the game differently than their predecessors.   Still haven't found the speed gun ratings on Scott in high school, but I suspect they were pretty good....I might just ask him...   Scott McGregor, El Segundo (Calif.), 1972 Although a teammate of Hall of Famer George Brett (as a sophomore and junior), it was McGregor who garnered more headlines during his three-year career under El Segundo legendary coach John Stevenson. McGregor was a three-time All-CIF selection and was twice named Player of the Year. He was also a Rawlings All-American as a senior. He set section records (which still stand) for career wins (51), career shutouts (20), shutouts in a season (9), and consecutive no-hitters (2). He also set the section record for career strikeouts (which has since been broken) with 496. He was the No. 14 overall pick in 1972 draft by the Yankees, but he was eventually traded to Baltimore. 
    • He's the top, He's the Colosseum! He's the top, A cornerstone of the Te-am! -- Pole Courter, from the musical "Anything Counts"  
    • You asked about velocity right? I love how you keep mentioning inner circle HoF players.  No word on how Frank Torre would do.  By concentrating on the top .1% you are missing out on an important issue I tried to relay to you.  Your average hitter is a lot more dangerous.   
    • And I think that’s fair. I’m just saying that I think it’s quite possible he would get that bump in today’s game given the emphasis on K’s from a pitching standpoint and hitter’s aggression and willingness to strike out.  It’s definitely a different game though. 
    • Yeah, I am sure Frank Robinson and Hank Aaron would have been just terrified by Kevin Gausman and Tommy Hunter.....lol.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...