Jump to content
interloper

Dan Straily 2019

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

 

Straily looked very pedestrian today 🙄 (Rolling Eyes)

 

just havking on you but I think this is closer to what you will get than his last start. As I mentioned I think it plays out that he's the 3rd best starter on the team before all is said and done.

At this point ERAs are out the window. If we can just find SP that can go 5IP and give up 3ER or less than it’s a success. Just keep us in the game, don’t let it get embarrassing, and not make the pen throw 7IP

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

 

Straily looked very pedestrian today 🙄 (Rolling Eyes)

 

just havking on you but I think this is closer to what you will get than his last start. As I mentioned I think it plays out that he's the 3rd best starter on the team before all is said and done.

That's not a high bar to get over. :D

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2019 at 9:14 PM, Tony-OH said:

Straily scouting report against A's tonight:

FB: 88-91 that was hit hard (98.8 EV avg). 2 Swinging strikes in 21 pitches
SL: 82-87 that didn't miss any bats in 23 pitches. (92.7 EV)
CH: 83-84 that got two swinging strikes on 17 pitches. (88.1EV) 

87 was the ML average EV in 2018.

 

Start #2 against the Red Sox.

FB: 88-91 that was hit around MLB avg (87.5 EV avg). 1 Swinging strikes in 42 pitches
SL: 82-85 that didn't miss any bats in 10 pitches. (100.3 EV)
CH: 83-85 that got 7 swinging strikes on 32. (84.3EV) 

It appears the Orioles adjusted Strailey and had him use his changeup much more than his slider, which at least through his first two starts with the Orioles is his worse pitch that misses the least amount of bats and gets hit the hardest.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strailey reminds me of a younger Steve Trachsel. I don't hate it! If you can have success in the big leagues as a RHP with a 90 mph fastball, more power to you. Seems like he was closer to his normal self yesterday.

And if he ends up stinking, hey, he was less money than Nate Karns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

That's not a high bar to get over. :D

Sure but the poster I quoted said he wasn’t a 5th starter in the AL east.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is 88-91 where Straily has been throughout his career?  I thought he threw a little harder than that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, stef said:

 

I like what Straily has to say, and I like the way he says it. 

 

http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/04/os-dan-straily-on-velocity-the-teams-clubhouse-vibe-and-more.html

 

o

 

MINNESOTA T WINS )))))) (APRIL 20th) )))))) [Game One]

Jorge Luis Pacheco Polanco - SS

Marwin Gonzalez - 3B

Nelson Ramon Cruz Martinez - DH

Eddie Rosario - LF

Willians Astudillo - 1B

Andrew Jacob Cave - RF

Jonathan Rufino Jezus Schoop - 2B

Jason Castro - C

Byron Buxton - CF

Jose Orlando Berrios - RHP )) (2-1, 2.30 ERA) ) *

 

* )) Leads the American League in WHIP (0.732)

 

http://www.baseballpress.com/lineups

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/16/2019 at 6:26 PM, ChuckS said:

Is 88-91 where Straily has been throughout his career?  I thought he threw a little harder than that. 

Yeah, he's been 89-90 for most of his career. Hard to believe this guy hung around a 4 ERA the past three years, looks like he's throwing batting practice out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

Straily managed to muddle through 5 innings, and leave the game with the score tied.

 

 

15 OUTS: )5 Flyouts, 4 Strikeouts, 3 Groundouts, 2 Lineouts, 1 Foulout

 

DANIEL STEVEN STRAILY ))))))) (vs. TWINS, 4/20) ))))))) [Game One]

IP:lll5

H:llll 6 )(3 Home Runs, 2 Doubles, 1 Single)

R:lllll 3

BB:lll)l

SO:lll4

Pitches: ll)98 )(62 )Strikes, )36)Balls)

2019 ERA: ))8.59  ))  14.67 IP  (14 ER) 

2019 WHIP: ))1.841  ))  14.67 IP  (27 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )).328 ) (21 for 64) 

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*************************

12 lll(91 llStrikes, lll31 lllBalls)

29 ll(19 llStrikes, ll10 llllBalls)

17 lll(11 llStrikes, lll61 lllBalls)

27 ll(13 llStrikes, ll14 llllBalls)

13 lll(10 llStrikes, lll31 lllBalls)

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the baseballs are juiced up which it’s obvious they are instead of Straily insinuating so id  much rather him just accept personal responsibility and not even bring it up. He don’t need to be making excuses the other pitchers are throwing the same balls. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

Straily ceded 0 Earned Runs over 4 Innings Pitched, but he threw a lot of pitches in the process, necessitating his early exit from the game.

 

 

12 OUTS: )3 Strikeouts, 3 Flyouts, 2 Popouts, 2 Lineouts, 1 Groundout, 1 Foulout

 

DANIEL STEVEN STRAILY ))))))) (vs. TWINS, 4/27)

IP:lll4

H:llll 3 )(3 Singles)

R:lllll 1

ER:l0

BB:ll1

SO:ll3

Pitches: ll)89 )(55 )Strikes, )34)Balls)

2019 ERA: ))6.75  ))  18.67 IP  (14 ER) 

2019 WHIP: ))1.661  ))  18.67 IP  (31 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )).304 ) (24 for 79) 

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*************************

18 lll(11 llStrikes, lll71 lllBalls)

14 lll(91 llStrikes, lll51 lllBalls)

28 lll(19 llStrikes, lll91 lllBalls)

29 lll(16 llStrikes, l13 llllBalls)

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too bad he labored so much in the 3rd/4th innings.    Asking this bullpen to cover 5 innings is a recipe for disaster.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Too bad he labored so much in the 3rd/4th innings.    Asking this bullpen to cover 5 innings is a recipe for disaster.   

I think Straily is the least of the O's problems. Since he has been stretched out he as allowed 4 earned runs in 14 innings pitched over 3 games.  That is a 2.57 ERA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I think Straily is the least of the O's problems. Since he has been stretched out he as allowed 4 earned runs in 14 innings pitched over 3 games.  That is a 2.57 ERA.

I don’t disagree that he’s done reasonably well.   Just saying that even though he only allowed 1 run in 4 innings, asking our bullpen to protect a 1-run lead for 5 innings is like asking me to solve a differential equation written in Chinese.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Thought this guy deserves a thread after being pretty dominant so far... 4 shutout innings as a starter today gives him 8 scoreless innings at GCL so far. no walks and 6 K’s on the year leaves him.038 whip. so 0.00 ERA and .038 whip after 3 games. GCL shut out the GCL Red Sox today 2-0
    • What reasoning are you using to come to that conclusion?  He didn't in AAA, by 82 points of OPS.  He didn't in AA by 168 points.  He didn't in high A by 44 points.  Why would he in the majors?
    • So the two guys the orioles got back in the cashner trade have to be on the new list of 25 DSL prospects to watch. I would also assume that the Prado kid has to be our top DSL prospect right now based on his age and performance. 
    • Well, we'd still be contractually obligated to pay him, but I won't pretend there are differences.  And I do base part of that comment on the fact that I doubt others will try him out as a reclamation attempt.  If I were Davis, I wouldn't try another team if cut loose.  Well, hopefully Hyde does get decisions with the lineup and Elias gives him the 40 man.  I'd like to think they talk a bit, but if I were Hyde, I'd play the same game.  I'm not saying Elias is sabotaging the team on a level that others would.  My only point is cutting him doesn't really net anything at this point.
    • Go through an objective checklist.  Women's soccer today is a lot more like 1800s or early 1900s baseball than it is today's major leagues.  Small crowds, small salaries, leagues folding, limited history, teams playing in essentially community parks.   Just the salaries are a big indicator - the max individual salary for the league is $46k, and this is one of if not the top league in the world.  I have administrative assistants who make more than stars in the NWSL. The minimum salary is $16k - you can make that working fast food.  I'd guarantee you players have dropped out of the league because they can't make any money.  The talent pool expands and contracts with salary, and $46k isn't buying much talent.  The USWNT players make a lot more, the rank and file make the kind of salary you get as a starting elementary school teacher in Alabama. In 1871 many of the best players in the world were in the National Association.  It was the best baseball league in the world.  But objectively the NA is a low-level minor league compared to today. You can wish and want that today's NWSL is a high-level pro league.  But it simply is not.  Objectively it's on par with the BaySox or the Baltimore Blast.  It's a minor league paying minor league salaries, playing in front of minor league crowds, and on shaky financial footing.  
    • I agree, I'm just not expecting much of a return. Just dump his salary because Duquette should never have taken it on in the first place. The idea that we'd be able to flip a very flawed player like Villar for something of value was never made sense to me. 
    • I cherry picked the lowest year exactly because that was the lowest point once they got all the dead weight off the books.  To me that makes perfect sense.  As to your figure or my figure, I've recently mentioned that payroll estimates vary, I wasn't being duplicitous I was just using. http://www.stevetheump.com/Payrolls.htm That site had the Astros at $22,062,600 in 2013.  If the number isn't accurate, sorry but it certainly wasn't intentional.   My point is that the O's payroll in a similar spot in the rebuild is significantly higher than what the Astros had, that is true even accounting for payroll inflation.  I think that the higher starting point means we should not expect the Orioles to follow the same payroll expansion the Astros had.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...