Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Philip

Trade value 2019

Recommended Posts

This is a general discussion post discussing who on the team has meaningful trade value for this year,  and how much. This is a basic question that probably been started before, in which case I hope the moderators will move this comment to that post. Until then, onward!

I really want to ask about Mancini. He’s hitting well, and has already amassed 1.1 fWAR(for comparison, Mike Trout has 1.8) Mancini’s defense is slightly above average at 1B, slightly below average(but improved) in the COF. He’s still at league minimum pay, so his trade value has doubtless gone up since day 1.

Is he worth anything meaningful?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think he’ll have to keep hitting at a good clip through mid-season.    

Yeah I think we're about a month (or more) away from really being able to talk trade value. Remember, Schoop started off really poorly last year, then got insanely hot right before the trade deadline, and we cleaned up. The opposite could happen for a guy like Mancini. It's all about timing. 

Cashner is a guy you hope keeps it rolling out there and gets you a minor leaguer of some sort. 

Givens I think we should move as fast as possible if he starts to get hot. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, interloper said:

Yeah I think we're about a month (or more) away from really being able to talk trade value. Remember, Schoop started off really poorly last year, then got insanely hot right before the trade deadline, and we cleaned up. The opposite could happen for a guy like Mancini. It's all about timing. 

Cashner is a guy you hope keeps it rolling out there and gets you a minor leaguer of some sort. 

Givens I think we should move as fast as possible if he starts to get hot. 

Hopefully he gets really hot. The Braves are having issues with the back of their pen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade value is what a team can realistically expect to get out of a player.  For Mancini he's a 115 OPS+ first baseman/LFer.  He'll have to keep hitting well above his established value to be seen as more than a average 27-year-old first baseman.

If you make a list of first basemen/LF/DHs with a 115ish OPS+ in their career you get a lot of names.  Chris Davis, Kendrys Morales, Steve Pearce, Evan Gattis, Victor Martinez, Mike Morse, Mike Napoli, Justin Morneau, Billy Butler, Paul Konerko, Alfonso Soriano, Luke Scott, Aubrey Huff. Jack Cust. Matt Stairs. Cliff Floyd. Kevin Millar. Tino Martinez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three months from the trade deadline. Who knows? Look at the Yankees presumed starters in spring training. They are all on the IL. Anything can happen between now and July, and a lot will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Trade value is what a team can realistically expect to get out of a player.  For Mancini he's a 115 OPS+ first baseman/LFer.  He'll have to keep hitting well above his established value to be seen as more than a average 27-year-old first baseman.

If you make a list of first basemen/LF/DHs with a 115ish OPS+ in their career you get a lot of names.  Chris Davis, Kendrys Morales, Steve Pearce, Evan Gattis, Victor Martinez, Mike Morse, Mike Napoli, Justin Morneau, Billy Butler, Paul Konerko, Alfonso Soriano, Luke Scott, Aubrey Huff. Jack Cust. Matt Stairs. Cliff Floyd. Kevin Millar. Tino Martinez.

You're not wrong, but teams aren't going to simply be looking at OPS+ when targeting a guy in a trade. There's a lot more to consider like age, control years, athleticism, clubhouse stuff, their own proprietary projection systems, etc. I think it's fair to say that Trey Mancini isn't Steve Pearce simply because they have similar career OPS+'s. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many ~contending teams need a solid 1B? I’m not sure the Rockies are expected to contend anymore, Seattle has Vogelbach, the D-Backs are set for the moment, I can’t think of anyone who needs a first Base guy, but a RF who isn’t horrible might have value. Heck even the Yankees might be happy with him in RF. The Indians, too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, interloper said:

You're not wrong, but teams aren't going to simply be looking at OPS+ when targeting a guy in a trade. There's a lot more to consider like age, control years, athleticism, clubhouse stuff, their own proprietary projection systems, etc. I think it's fair to say that Trey Mancini isn't Steve Pearce simply because they have similar career OPS+'s. 

Yeah, true.   But I think Mancini is still establishing what his baseline is as a player.   He’s had two very different seasons in the big leagues.    Now he’s off to a great start but how will he be doing three months from now?    I’m certainly not going to assume he’s Paul Goldschmidt just because he’s had an excellent four weeks.   But if he’s posting a .900+ OPS in July, that’s a lot more significant.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, nate22 said:

Hopefully he gets really hot. The Braves are having issues with the back of their pen.

I hope that Hyde realizes that Givens is a one-inning pitcher.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

I hope that Hyde realizes that Givens is a one-inning pitcher.   

That has a lot to do with guys not named Givens.  Not a lot to trust out there right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering who we would be more willing to trade between Mancini and Nunez.  They are pretty similar players, pretty good offensively but limited defensively and neither one runs that well.  Doesn't really make sense to keep them both, does it?  Especially if we can get meaningful value from one or the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

I hope that Hyde realizes that Givens is a one-inning pitcher.   

Hyde has not been able to get his bullpen to the point where he’s comfortable leaving the 8th inning to anyone else, even if that means stretching Givens.   And since we rarely are leading in the 8th, the fact that Givens won’t be available the next day isn’t a hindrance.   Givens has not performed well in his second inning of work this year, but he does have a decent track record in multi-inning outings.   Last year he went 2+ seven times, holding opponents scoreless in 5 of those and allowing 1 run in 2.1 another time.  In 2017, he also went 2+ seven times, holding opponents scoreless in six of them.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Relative to where the season started (IMO):

Stock up: Mancini, Cashner, Villar, Means, Nunez, Smith Jr.

Stock down: Bundy, Cobb, Givens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Relative to where the season started (IMO):

Stock up: Mancini, Cashner, Villar, Means, Nunez, Smith Jr.

Stock down: Bundy, Cobb, Givens

Yeah, but SSS for all concerned, especially Cobb who has only made two starts, one of which was very solid (5.2 IP, 2 R).    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Spring Training Stats

Baseball Savant Stats

Minor League Stats







  • Posts

    • Thought this guy deserves a thread after being pretty dominant so far... 4 shutout innings as a starter today gives him 8 scoreless innings at GCL so far. no walks and 6 K’s on the year leaves him.038 whip. so 0.00 ERA and .038 whip after 3 games. GCL shut out the GCL Red Sox today 2-0
    • What reasoning are you using to come to that conclusion?  He didn't in AAA, by 82 points of OPS.  He didn't in AA by 168 points.  He didn't in high A by 44 points.  Why would he in the majors?
    • So the two guys the orioles got back in the cashner trade have to be on the new list of 25 DSL prospects to watch. I would also assume that the Prado kid has to be our top DSL prospect right now based on his age and performance. 
    • Well, we'd still be contractually obligated to pay him, but I won't pretend there are differences.  And I do base part of that comment on the fact that I doubt others will try him out as a reclamation attempt.  If I were Davis, I wouldn't try another team if cut loose.  Well, hopefully Hyde does get decisions with the lineup and Elias gives him the 40 man.  I'd like to think they talk a bit, but if I were Hyde, I'd play the same game.  I'm not saying Elias is sabotaging the team on a level that others would.  My only point is cutting him doesn't really net anything at this point.
    • Go through an objective checklist.  Women's soccer today is a lot more like 1800s or early 1900s baseball than it is today's major leagues.  Small crowds, small salaries, leagues folding, limited history, teams playing in essentially community parks.   Just the salaries are a big indicator - the max individual salary for the league is $46k, and this is one of if not the top league in the world.  I have administrative assistants who make more than stars in the NWSL. The minimum salary is $16k - you can make that working fast food.  I'd guarantee you players have dropped out of the league because they can't make any money.  The talent pool expands and contracts with salary, and $46k isn't buying much talent.  The USWNT players make a lot more, the rank and file make the kind of salary you get as a starting elementary school teacher in Alabama. In 1871 many of the best players in the world were in the National Association.  It was the best baseball league in the world.  But objectively the NA is a low-level minor league compared to today. You can wish and want that today's NWSL is a high-level pro league.  But it simply is not.  Objectively it's on par with the BaySox or the Baltimore Blast.  It's a minor league paying minor league salaries, playing in front of minor league crowds, and on shaky financial footing.  
    • I agree, I'm just not expecting much of a return. Just dump his salary because Duquette should never have taken it on in the first place. The idea that we'd be able to flip a very flawed player like Villar for something of value was never made sense to me. 
    • I cherry picked the lowest year exactly because that was the lowest point once they got all the dead weight off the books.  To me that makes perfect sense.  As to your figure or my figure, I've recently mentioned that payroll estimates vary, I wasn't being duplicitous I was just using. http://www.stevetheump.com/Payrolls.htm That site had the Astros at $22,062,600 in 2013.  If the number isn't accurate, sorry but it certainly wasn't intentional.   My point is that the O's payroll in a similar spot in the rebuild is significantly higher than what the Astros had, that is true even accounting for payroll inflation.  I think that the higher starting point means we should not expect the Orioles to follow the same payroll expansion the Astros had.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...