Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OFFNY

vs. BLUE JAYS, 6/12

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I shouldn't have loaded the bases?

I was thinking more of "Heck, if the idea was to blow the game open, I could've done that."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Helmet flying and everything. That looked like daddy.

The poor guy. He has had fools like me making comments like that  since he was born.

Yeah, well, when your dad is a badass baseball player...it's not a bad thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Helmet flying and everything. That looked like daddy.

The poor guy. He has had fools like me making comments like that  since he was born.

And it was an absolute crime that Vlad Sr. wasn't inducted on the first ballot. He's not a guy like Jack Morris who had to wait around and barely get in...but I can't believe he didn't make it on the first one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Straily warming up.  I don't even know why I'm watching anymore.

Masochism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Philip said:

Masochism?

Maybe the hope that the offense can do something.  I don't expect them to come back from 6 runs down but if they could get a few that would be nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Maybe the hope that the offense can do something.  I don't expect them to come back from 6 runs down but if they could get a few that would be nice.

I think Brandon surrendered when he put Castro in. If he gets through the inning unscathed, the plan moving forward is different. But after 6-1, it’s,”screw it. Put in Phillips and save the remaining cartridges for tomorrow.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Broxton quicker to the ball with the modified stance. He's at least fouling pitches off instead of swinging through everything. I like the new approach at least. It needs to produce consistent results, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I think Brandon surrendered when he put Castro in. If he gets through the inning unscathed, the plan moving forward is different. But after 6-1, it’s,”screw it. Put in Phillips and save the remaining cartridges for tomorrow.”

Yeah, I turned it off.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe Biagini May be the most successful rule five dick in the last 10 years. He’s been outstanding for the Blue Jays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteveA said:

Getting a little interesting!

In the words of Spock,” Extremely little, Ensign.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • I'm multitasking.
    • I'm here too, logged in as DJ Stewart's number one fan on the board. I like the guys who don't look like athletes.
    • Here's bad news: I'm watching. 
    • Looks like it's just me and you here, @eddie83
    • So I had a grand theory all ready to explain modern baseball, based on the impact of the information revolution on defense.  According to the theory, better data has allowed teams to better measure individual defense and the contribution of defense to run prevention, which has led to increased emphasis on defensive ability in personnel decisions.  Better data has also led to shifts and other improvements in defensive positioning.  All of these factors have led in theory to improved defensive efficiency--an increase in the percentage of balls in play that are converted into outs.  In turn, this has led to a change in optimal offensive strategies.  If it's harder to get hits on balls in play, then it is less likely that you will be able to score runs by stringing a bunch of singles together, or by using small ball tactics like base stealing, the hit and run and the sacrifice.  Teams thus optimally put more emphasis on power in personnel decisions, because a home run is the one way to score runs that can't be stopped by good defense. Great theory, huh?  Then I looked at the data.  Here are the numbers for aggregate defensive efficiency for MLB since 2001: 2001:  0.691     2002:  0.695   2003:  0.694   2004:  0.691   2005:  0.693   2006:  0.687   2007:  0.686   2008:  0.689 2009:  0.690   2010:  0.691   2011:  0.694    2012:  0.691   2013:  0.692   2014:  0.690    2015:  0.689    2016: 0.688 2017:  0.688    2018:  0.691 So twenty years into the defensive revolution, we have...the same defensive efficiency that we had in 2001.  Teams on the whole are doing no better today at converting balls in play into outs than they were in 2001, despite all of the shifts and all of the zone ratings and other defensive measures that are now available.   So much for my theory.  Some earlier posts suggest another theory--improved pitch design and velocity have made it harder to hit for contact, which increases strikeouts and reduces batting average.  In turn this leads to a greater emphasis on power at the expense of contact, increasing home runs, further increasing strikeouts and further reducing batting average.  That theory may be correct, but it's less obvious to me that the correct strategic response to improved pitch design and velocity is to sacrifice contact for power. It could go the other way--in response to better pitching, it is even more important to hit for contact, to put the ball in play, to sustain an offense.  It would take a model simulation to determine whether the optimal response to power pitching is to emphasize power hitting.   Or it could just be a juiced ball!  
    • Two out walk no damage. I say Orioles win 8-2 tonight.  
    • Holy hell Soler is having himself a season.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...