Pickles

By that logic, we've developed Rodriguez and Bradish, and we have an exciting you group of positional talent. So do we need to? Your last paragraph is perfectly reasonable, and not very different from my position. This team is going to spend more money just by arbitration alone, so yeah, the payroll is going to have to increase. I totally want them to extend select young players. And I totally want them to sign FAs that help the team. I do not expect them to spend money at the top of the FA market like the Rangers have done, but the Astros have not. I think ultimately a team that makes a lot of sense to emulate is the St. Louis Cardinals. The Cardinals rarely sign big free agents, but they do occasionally target a pending FA, trade for him using prospects, and then extend him. Matt Holliday and Nolan Arenado being examples of that. Those are the biggest splashes I expect the O's to make. And I'm fine with it. Making big, expensive moves is radically overrated by most fans in its relation to actually winning baseball games.

How many FA aces did the Braves sign?

Yeah, we'll never have to beat the Yankees. Not like they're in our division or anything. Not like they're the most successful franchise in the sport's history. Not like they're in first place as we speak or anything. Nope we don't need to worry about them. Or, hear me out, we need to beat the Yankees too, and you just want to ignore them because they are proof positive that big splashy acquisitions of "aces" doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of team building.

So did the Yankees and they missed the playoffs completely. We had two top 5 starters. We had top-end pitching. They didn't pitch well. It happens. Acquiring another starting pitcher would have guaranteed nothing.

We had two of the top 5 starters in the AL going into the playoffs. We lost because they pitched poorly. Not because they were poor pitchers. Teams don't win 100 games without high-end starting pitching.

Correct me if I'm wrong, and it's been said a couple times in this thread, but we have Grayson for 5 more years AFTER this one. He didn't get a full year of service time last year and won't be a FA until after 2029. IF he turns into Justin Verlander, it would be really beneficial to sign him an extension asap. However, almost any other outcome, an extension does little for the Orioles. That we have to resort to the supposed psychological advantages it would supposedly grant, I think is pretty good evidence of that.

I don't really buy that. The only reason a guy like MIller adds excess value in October is because you're going to use him differently. If you were willing to use him like that in May, he'd be every bit as valuable then. I think you could argue a top heavier team might have an advantage over a more balanced one in the playoffs all things being equal, but I don't think you can correlate that to big free agent signings or "flashy" off-season moves. I'm about to respond to another post here, but people will look at the O's last season and say they didn't have an "ace" and that's why they lost in the playoffs. If you actually examine the claim it's pretty silly. Nobody wins 100 games without some top-end starting pitching. The O's had two guys who were basically top 5 AL pitchers in the second half of last season. They lost in the playoffs because one of them pitched ok, and one of them got bombed. We've all appreciated Burns so far, but there's nothing stopping Burnes from getting bombed in the upcoming playoffs.

Are their ways to make your team better in October that don't manifest in April-September?

The playoffs is extremely volatile. This isn't the NBA or even the NFL; the best team doesn't win all the time, or perhaps even most of the time. So long as they are annually good enough to win the AL East, there really can be no rational critique of their approach.

Here's my prediction: We're going to win ~ games this season and ~100 games next season. And in between, in the next off-season, this board will have several meltdowns bemoaning the lack of FA signings.

Exactly. We've got him for the entirety of his 20s. There's no need to guarantee him anything into his 30s, and it would only really work out in favor of the O's if he has a borderline HOF career. I like him; I don't like him that much.

There's very little upside to a Rodriguez extension for the Orioles, unless Grayson becomes a generational pitcher.

Why? We already have him controlled for the next 5 years. How long of a commitment do you want to make to him?

I think that would be a pretty hard argument to make. We have him cost-controlled for five years AFTER this one. That's plenty for a pitcher.

I don't think they'll ever spend BIG on pitching. It's just too volatile and risky. I also don't think they'll spend BIG on any FA. There 100+ million contracts, the few of them they do hand out, will almost exclusively go to homegrown guys.