Jump to content

Looking ahead to the 2012 draft


Recommended Posts

It's never too early, right?

... right? ;)

High school

Lance McCullers, RHP, Tampa Jesuit HS, Fla.: McCullers has an electric arm. The son of the former big leaguer of the same name, he has the chance to be much better than his dad, with a fastball that can touch the upper 90s and signs of a plus slider.

Nick Williams, OF, Galveston Ball HS, Texas: He's got a very advanced idea at the plate, a left-handed hitter with the chance to be a run producer with power. He's athletic and should profile very well as a corner outfielder.

Trey Williams, 3B, Valencia HS, Calif.: The son of former first-round pick Eddie Williams is a strong right-handed hitter with legitimate power potential.

Lucas Giolito, RHP, Harvard-Westlake HS, Calif.: Giolito is big and strong and can crank his fastball into the mid-90s with a low-effort delivery.

Addison Russell, SS, Pace HS, Fla.: Russell is very strong and athletic. He's an excellent right-handed hitter who makes consistent, hard contact with power. He's got a plus arm as well.

College

Mark Appel, RHP, Stanford: Some believe that Appel, a power pitcher who's been at the front of Stanford's rotation for two years, could be the No. 1 overall pick.

Deven Marrero, SS, Arizona State: Part of an impressive crop of 2012 Draft talent at ASU, Marrero is a legitimate shortstop with great defensive actions and a playable bat for the next level.

Michael Wacha, RHP, Texas A&M: Wacha stepped up with John Stilson on the shelf to pitch A&M to a Super Regional. He'll be the staff ace in 2012.

Jake Barrett, RHP, Arizona State: He and Brady Rogers may form the best college rotation in the game in 2012, ASU's version of Gerrit Cole and Trevor Bauer.

Branden Kline, RHP, Virginia: Virginia's closer, Kline had 17 saves heading into the Super Regional. He's athletic and has a live arm, the kind of college closer who could be very quick to the big leagues.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110608&content_id=20222396&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&partnerId=rss_mlb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 5 weeks later...

Appel, marrero, williams, giolito, russell, virant, ruiz, weickel, diekroger, wacha, gausman, zunino, rodgers, johnson all worth watching. No clear top 5 right now. Giolito/Appel/Williams probably 3 most popular right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appel, marrero, williams, giolito, russell, virant, ruiz, weickel, diekroger, wacha, gausman, zunino, rodgers, johnson all worth watching. No clear top 5 right now. Giolito/Appel/Williams probably 3 most popular right now.

You don't have McCullers on your top follow list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman is intriguing as a draft eligible sophomore. I like Wacha a lot.

I don't think I'm quite as high on Appel as others seem to be. I'd liked to have seen more swing-and-miss in 2011.

I'm also not particularly high at the moment on Diekroeger. He needs to show me a lot this year.

Really like Nick Williams' tools.

Zunino is a legit bat - .371/.442/.674 (1.116 OPS) in 2011 for Florida.

Stotle, what do you make of Victor Roache (OF, Georgia Southern)?

.326/.438/.778! with 30 HRs in 230 ABs. Is that power for real? Will he make contact enough to manifest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman is intriguing as a draft eligible sophomore. I like Wacha a lot.

I don't think I'm quite as high on Appel as others seem to be. I'd liked to have seen more swing-and-miss in 2011.

I'm also not particularly high at the moment on Diekroeger. He needs to show me a lot this year.

Really like Nick Williams' tools.

Zunino is a legit bat - .371/.442/.674 (1.116 OPS) in 2011 for Florida.

Stotle, what do you make of Victor Roache (OF, Georgia Southern)?

.326/.438/.778! with 30 HRs in 230 ABs. Is that power for real? Will he make contact enough to manifest?

Haven't been in on him. No idea about his tools. He's a big dude with a lot of swing-and-miss according to stat line. Don't know if there is reason to think he'll get better.

Diekroger is an athleticism play. What do you dislike outside of the slash line from last year?

What do you think of Appel if you aren't sold? Big projectable arm that throws mid-90s with a plus slider is usually a nice combo for a rising junior, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have McCullers on your top follow list?

Yeah, he's at the top. Out of mind since I haven't seen him this summer (all the guys I listed were on my USA rosters I had while at the car dealership this morning), but clearly one of the better arms in the class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been in on him. No idea about his tools. He's a big dude with a lot of swing-and-miss according to stat line. Don't know if there is reason to think he'll get better.

Diekroger is an athleticism play. What do you dislike outside of the slash line from last year?

What do you think of Appel if you aren't sold? Big projectable arm that throws mid-90s with a plus slider is usually a nice combo for a rising junior, no?

When I say I'm not high on one of these guys, it just means that they don't jump out at me as being elite picks. Not that I don't like what they have to offer. For example, I wasn't high on Barnes pre-season, wasn't high on him throughout the season, but would still love to have a Barnes-esque prospect and think Boston had a fantastic draft. I guess I just mean I'm not high relative to the praise I see elsewhere.

I like Appel a ton and think he's a legit first-half of the first-round pick, just have a feeling he won't be the first college pitcher on my board when all is said and done. I hold him to a higher standard because he's being called the cream of the crop. Really like the stuff and frame, just curious why he didn't miss more bats last year with K numbers up throughout the conference in general.

Diekroeger is a scout's pick. You can dream on him turning into something special, but a sub .100 ISO-P concerns me, particularly from a guy who might end up at third base. I know he showed well at the Area Code games out of high school, was selected in the 2nd round by Tampa Bay, and had a phenomenal freshman season, but when a kid's ISO-P drops below 100 and BA drops below 300 the year the new bats are implemented, it's a red flag to me. I'm not ruling him out, but I need to see more next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I say I'm not high on one of these guys, it just means that they don't jump out at me as being elite picks. Not that I don't like what they have to offer. For example, I wasn't high on Barnes pre-season, wasn't high on him throughout the season, but would still love to have a Barnes-esque prospect and think Boston had a fantastic draft. I guess I just mean I'm not high relative to the praise I see elsewhere.

I like Appel a ton and think he's a legit first-half of the first-round pick, just have a feeling he won't be the first college pitcher on my board when all is said and done. I hold him to a higher standard because he's being called the cream of the crop. Really like the stuff and frame, just curious why he didn't miss more bats last year with K numbers up throughout the conference in general.

Diekroeger is a scout's pick. You can dream on him turning into something special, but a sub .100 ISO-P concerns me, particularly from a guy who might end up at third base. I know he showed well at the Area Code games out of high school, was selected in the 2nd round by Tampa Bay, and had a phenomenal freshman season, but when a kid's ISO-P drops below 100 and BA drops below 300 the year the new bats are implemented, it's a red flag to me. I'm not ruling him out, but I need to see more next season.

Oh, okay. Sounds more like a "I don't know, I need to see more" than a "I'm not high on him". Fair enough.

As an aside, I think a lot of stat analysis using last year is going to lead to some bad assumptions being made -- particularly in the bloggosphere -- but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, okay. Sounds more like a "I don't know, I need to see more" than a "I'm not high on him". Fair enough.

As an aside, I think a lot of stat analysis using last year is going to lead to some bad assumptions being made -- particularly in the bloggosphere -- but that's just me.

Poor wording on my part I guess.

BTW, I absolutely agree re: statistical analysis of 2011. We simply don't have enough data to draw inferences about loss in production due to bats, which I hardly intended to do. I simply said that it's a concern. A strong showing in 2012 could go a long way toward easing my doubts about Diekroeger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A key variable is how (in)expensive each theoretical player and future years of control. i think the Os prefer to have mixture of player types, and hope that strategic deployment can have either A, B, or C in exceed their production norms. 
    • I'm going with two mids, a fat and a skinny. Anyone gets that reference, I'll buy you a beer if I ever see you at Camden Yards.
    • Wait, how do you assess if a player is ready or not if not for how they perform at the major league level? How do you assess that a player was not rushed when he's putting up historically bad numbers to start off a career? Now I agree with you that Elias has a better feel for when he should go back down or not, but I don't think Holliday has proven anybody wrong who thinks he was rushed. His performance so far if anything has proven them right.  Can he right the ship and prove them wrong, sure, but so far, anyone who says he was absolutely ready have been proven wrong. He's not been just unlucky, he's been terrible at every measurable attribute we have for hitting.  There is also a misnomer that players can not learn anything else at a previous level. That's just wrong. Having statcast data now shows there is major league caliber stuff in AAA, it's just often not consistent.  Plus, the ability to just relax a little work on the things the major league coaches have him working on in a less stressful environment can also be a plus. He has 147 AA PAs under his belt that he put up a respectable .899 OPS, but he's also a kid who had a 105 PA stretch last year in High-A ball where he put up a .183/.362/.232/.594 slash line where he had two extra base hits and basically only got on base by walking against bad command High-A ball pitchers.  Holliday has a tremendous amount of talent, and he's going to be fine in the long run, but I disagree that sending him back to AAA will do him no good. Will having him set more futility records to start a major league career be helpful? If we get swept in a series and he goes 0-for does that mean he's now hurting the team? I'm ok with leaving it up to Elias/Hyde to make that decision, but I would have zero issues if they sent him back to reset for bit. 
    • Suppose you have three players in an organization who play the same position.  Player A is +10 runs on offense but -10 runs on defense.  Player B is -10 runs on offense but +10 runs on defense.  Player C is average on both offense and defense.   Which player would you choose to be on your team? And is your answer different depending on which position we’re talking about? Apart from your preference, do you think the Orioles have a preference? For purposes of my questions, no copping out by saying it depends who else is on the team.  
    • And if age was the ONLY data point we used for projection, you MIGHT then have a point.  But its not, and you don't.
    • If Kjerstadt hits well I see no reason to send him back down, he could DH if necessary, good teams find a place for a good hitter.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...