+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    421

    BA Fiirst Mock Draft

    Keep in mind, this is how they would draft and not what they think or have heard will happen.

    4. ORIOLES (John): When he was the manager in Arizona and later Texas, Buck Showalter got involved in the draft decision-making process, reportedly steering the Rangers to take John Mayberry Jr. instead of Travis Buck in 2005. If Showalter has any influence in Baltimore's draft room, it likely will involve getting polished talent to help the Orioles quickly, while they have some veterans and are trying to end their 13-year streak of losing seasons. Baltimore doesn't pick again until No. 64, so getting this pick right is imperative. While there have been rumors that he may be tough to sign, Danny Hultzen is the best choice for the Orioles. Another lefthander to team with Brian Matusz and Zach Britton is the smart choice, too.
    Rendon to Pittsburgh, Cole to Seattle, Bradley to Arizona.

    Link


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Richmond, Va
    Posts
    5,012
    Things could certainly shake out this way, though if ARI wants to go college lefty I assume they'd just select Hultzen again. Top members of that organization love him.

    If that left us with Bradley, that's a fine pick. Not quite as polished as Hultzen, but potentially higher ceiling and better build. He'll need to work out some command kinks and refine his secondaries but still should have a <3 year rough MiL development track.

    From what I understand, the big six that BAL is considering at this point are Cole, Rendon, Hulzten, Bradley, Bundy and Starling. That doesn't mean there couldn't be a sleeper in the mix, but each of those six guys was in play as of a couple of weeks ago.

    I wish Sonny Gray was stronger in the conversation, but sometimes a scout can't get a small frame out of his mind. I understand the sentiment, but I think it needs to be considered on a case to case basis.

    Still, any of the six guys mentioned above are justifiable IMO.
    Last edited by RVAbird; 04-26-2011 at 01:04 PM.

  3. #3
    Hutman's Avatar
    Hutman is offline Plus Member since 04/02 Norfolk Reputation
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Towson
    Posts
    499
    The top of this draft is stacked. I love the idea of Hultzen, I think he'd move quickly and has shown nice improvement this year, I've been hearing his name to Arizona at number 3, but if he's there I'd love to see the O's grab him. I also love Starling and Bundy from the HS ranks, but they will take longer to reach the bigs, but both have tons of potential.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lanham, MD
    Posts
    9,657
    Quote Originally Posted by RVAbird View Post
    Things could certainly shake out this way, though if ARI wants to go college lefty I assume they'd just select Hultzen again. Top members of that organization love him.

    If that left us with Bradley, that's a fine pick. Not quite as polished as Hultzen, but potentially higher ceiling and better build. He'll need to work out some command kinks and refine his secondaries but still should have a <3 year rough MiL development track.

    From what I understand, the big six that BAL is considering at this point are Cole, Rendon, Hulzten, Bradley, Bundy and Starling. That doesn't mean there couldn't be a sleeper in the mix, but each of those six guys was in play as of a couple of weeks ago.

    I wish Sonny Gray was stronger in the conversation, but sometimes a scout can't get a small frame out of his mind. I understand the sentiment, but I think it needs to be considered on a case to case basis.

    Still, any of the six guys mentioned above are justifiable IMO.
    It's not just the frame with Gray. His last bunch of starts his control has been all over the place. He's looking more like a 7-12 pick for me, and I liked him fringe top 5 for a long time.

  5. #5
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,926
    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    It's not just the frame with Gray. His last bunch of starts his control has been all over the place. He's looking more like a 7-12 pick for me, and I liked him fringe top 5 for a long time.
    Tim Lincecum - 4.5 BB/9 his junior year at Washington.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lanham, MD
    Posts
    9,657
    Quote Originally Posted by Stotle View Post
    Tim Lincecum - 4.5 BB/9 his junior year at Washington.
    Yuck. Nice stat pull though, kudos.

    You might be more up on him than me, but I heard not even the walks being the issue he was just having trouble locating all together. Thought maybe a nagging injury or something, so I was keeping tabs for the rest of the season.

  7. #7
    Sports Guy's Avatar
    Sports Guy is offline Plus Member Since 3/04 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    107,461
    Saw a tweet today that Gammons is hearing that Hulzten could go #1...but its just a rumor.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Richmond, Va
    Posts
    5,012
    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    It's not just the frame with Gray. His last bunch of starts his control has been all over the place. He's looking more like a 7-12 pick for me, and I liked him fringe top 5 for a long time.
    It is just the frame for many. People were writing off Gray based on size/effort before the season.

    I agree that control/command is a legitimate concern, and have said such. It's not prohibitive of me picking him top 5, however.

  9. #9
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,926
    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    Yuck. Nice stat pull though, kudos.

    You might be more up on him than me, but I heard not even the walks being the issue he was just having trouble locating all together. Thought maybe a nagging injury or something, so I was keeping tabs for the rest of the season.
    Eh, I don't see injury concern. His stuff is where it usually is. His command is where it usually is. He's improved his BB/9, SO/9, HR/9 and H/9 over the past year. He's still maintaining 94-96 into the late innings and showing a potential plus-plus breaker. I think command is one of the concerns you point to if you are pointing to concerns. I think size is a legit concern. But I think he overcomes both when it comes to developing into a good pro pitcher. I can't imagine he'll ever be a surgeon on the mound, but he should be accurate enough to succeed.
    Last edited by Stotle; 04-26-2011 at 08:31 PM.

  10. #10
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Sports Guy View Post
    Saw a tweet today that Gammons is hearing that Hulzten could go #1...but its just a rumor.
    I can't for the life of me imagine that actually happening, though I have the utmost professional respect for Mr. Gammons.

  11. #11
    flashjordnk is offline Plus Member Since June 2010 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    4,440
    So for those of you who know a lot about the draft, are there any high upside guys who's stock is falling that you would have expected here, but aren't. And that might have a chance to drop down to the O's next pick. We won't pick again until what 64th? So is this even a reasonable question to ask?

  12. #12
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,926
    Quote Originally Posted by flashjordnk View Post
    So for those of you who know a lot about the draft, are there any high upside guys who's stock is falling that you would have expected here, but aren't. And that might have a chance to drop down to the O's next pick. We won't pick again until what 64th? So is this even a reasonable question to ask?
    Matt Purke, obviously. Zach Cone (of, Georgia) entered the season with a chance to crack the 1st Rd and has struggled some, statistically (though I think his issues are correctable). Archie Bradley could fall due to signability, along the lines of AJ Cole last year (though with so many teams having extra picks I imagine someone would take a stab in the supplemental 1st Rd. Austin Hedges (c, JSerra HS, Calif.) is a stud defensive catcher that has swung the bat a little too -- his commitment is supposed to be strong, so he could slip to the 2nd or later. I'd like to say Alex Meyer (RHP, Kentucky) but don't see him making it out of the supplemental (and he could honestly still be selected in the top 10 overall). One interesting name is Austin Wood (rhp, USC) who has a little Arrieta in his draft profile. Showed 1st Rd stuff over the summer, has dialed up to 96 this spring, but command and consistency have been off. I can't imagine him going before the 2nd Rd at this point -- could be a very nice pick-up for an org that believes his issues can be cleaned-up quickly.

  13. #13
    waroriole's Avatar
    waroriole is offline Plus Member Since 6/08 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    14,523
    Does anyone know what kind of bonus Hultzen would be seeking? More than 6?

    Also, can anyone say what kind of talent might be there with the 2nd rounder? What guys could fall, and how would they rank in our system?

  14. #14
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,926
    Quote Originally Posted by waroriole View Post
    Does anyone know what kind of bonus Hultzen would be seeking? More than 6?

    Also, can anyone say what kind of talent might be there with the 2nd rounder? What guys could fall, and how would they rank in our system?
    Good talent in 2nd Rd -- potential mid-rotation arm, starting position player, etc.

    Hultzens have not made any figures public, so far as I am aware.

  15. #15
    Hutman's Avatar
    Hutman is offline Plus Member since 04/02 Norfolk Reputation
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Towson
    Posts
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by waroriole View Post
    Does anyone know what kind of bonus Hultzen would be seeking? More than 6?

    Also, can anyone say what kind of talent might be there with the 2nd rounder? What guys could fall, and how would they rank in our system?
    Do we know who his "advisor" is. I'm guessing that they will be looking at Cole (a Boras client) as their benchmark. I'm guessing when all is said and done, he will get a similar deal to the one we gave Matusz when he was drafted, as he was a # 4 pick.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2013 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us