Scholarships cut down to 11.7 total scholarships a while ago (and in large part due to Title IX). in 2008-09 the NCAA placed further restrictions on minimum size of scholarships for baseball, as well as total roster spots available and total persons that can receive a partial scholarship. Coaches hated it because 1) they could no longer give out 5%, 10%, 20% scholarships to kids, and 2) big programs were no longer able to rely on a stable of "invited walkons". Rosters that used to be 35-40 people deep with walkons can now be no deeper than 30, with no more than 27 of those kids getting partial scholarships. It has spread the talent out some, but has also made it more difficult on coaches to convince kids to come to school rather than turn pro.
Call me crazy, I think it's ridiculous that women's equestrian gets more scholarships (I believe 15) than baseball, but then again I don't have all the studies in front of me that show how important it is to make sure people can be paid to ride horses in college.
The idea of having an above average defender at 3B appeals to me. I made an analogy to Joe Crede earlier in the thread. Stotle said Esposito would swing and miss more. I haven't compared numbers, but maybe Brandon Inge is a better comp?
Umm, you're arguing that hitting a ball is a more important college skill than riding a horse. (Just giving you a hard time; the NCAA rules are the enemy of many sports.)
Mark, the NCAA D1 baseball scholarship limit was 13 when you were in school. The 11.7 comes from a 10% cut from 13. The bigger difference as Stotle mentioned is how those scholarships are allowed to be divided up. And there's a touch more potential regulation on how schools give non-athletic scholarships to athletes, but that's still a large loophole.
OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2011 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us
Bookmarks