Jump to content

Looking ahead to the 2012 draft


Recommended Posts

It's never too early, right?

... right? ;)

High school

Lance McCullers, RHP, Tampa Jesuit HS, Fla.: McCullers has an electric arm. The son of the former big leaguer of the same name, he has the chance to be much better than his dad, with a fastball that can touch the upper 90s and signs of a plus slider.

Nick Williams, OF, Galveston Ball HS, Texas: He's got a very advanced idea at the plate, a left-handed hitter with the chance to be a run producer with power. He's athletic and should profile very well as a corner outfielder.

Trey Williams, 3B, Valencia HS, Calif.: The son of former first-round pick Eddie Williams is a strong right-handed hitter with legitimate power potential.

Lucas Giolito, RHP, Harvard-Westlake HS, Calif.: Giolito is big and strong and can crank his fastball into the mid-90s with a low-effort delivery.

Addison Russell, SS, Pace HS, Fla.: Russell is very strong and athletic. He's an excellent right-handed hitter who makes consistent, hard contact with power. He's got a plus arm as well.

College

Mark Appel, RHP, Stanford: Some believe that Appel, a power pitcher who's been at the front of Stanford's rotation for two years, could be the No. 1 overall pick.

Deven Marrero, SS, Arizona State: Part of an impressive crop of 2012 Draft talent at ASU, Marrero is a legitimate shortstop with great defensive actions and a playable bat for the next level.

Michael Wacha, RHP, Texas A&M: Wacha stepped up with John Stilson on the shelf to pitch A&M to a Super Regional. He'll be the staff ace in 2012.

Jake Barrett, RHP, Arizona State: He and Brady Rogers may form the best college rotation in the game in 2012, ASU's version of Gerrit Cole and Trevor Bauer.

Branden Kline, RHP, Virginia: Virginia's closer, Kline had 17 saves heading into the Super Regional. He's athletic and has a live arm, the kind of college closer who could be very quick to the big leagues.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110608&content_id=20222396&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&partnerId=rss_mlb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 5 weeks later...

Appel, marrero, williams, giolito, russell, virant, ruiz, weickel, diekroger, wacha, gausman, zunino, rodgers, johnson all worth watching. No clear top 5 right now. Giolito/Appel/Williams probably 3 most popular right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appel, marrero, williams, giolito, russell, virant, ruiz, weickel, diekroger, wacha, gausman, zunino, rodgers, johnson all worth watching. No clear top 5 right now. Giolito/Appel/Williams probably 3 most popular right now.

You don't have McCullers on your top follow list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman is intriguing as a draft eligible sophomore. I like Wacha a lot.

I don't think I'm quite as high on Appel as others seem to be. I'd liked to have seen more swing-and-miss in 2011.

I'm also not particularly high at the moment on Diekroeger. He needs to show me a lot this year.

Really like Nick Williams' tools.

Zunino is a legit bat - .371/.442/.674 (1.116 OPS) in 2011 for Florida.

Stotle, what do you make of Victor Roache (OF, Georgia Southern)?

.326/.438/.778! with 30 HRs in 230 ABs. Is that power for real? Will he make contact enough to manifest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman is intriguing as a draft eligible sophomore. I like Wacha a lot.

I don't think I'm quite as high on Appel as others seem to be. I'd liked to have seen more swing-and-miss in 2011.

I'm also not particularly high at the moment on Diekroeger. He needs to show me a lot this year.

Really like Nick Williams' tools.

Zunino is a legit bat - .371/.442/.674 (1.116 OPS) in 2011 for Florida.

Stotle, what do you make of Victor Roache (OF, Georgia Southern)?

.326/.438/.778! with 30 HRs in 230 ABs. Is that power for real? Will he make contact enough to manifest?

Haven't been in on him. No idea about his tools. He's a big dude with a lot of swing-and-miss according to stat line. Don't know if there is reason to think he'll get better.

Diekroger is an athleticism play. What do you dislike outside of the slash line from last year?

What do you think of Appel if you aren't sold? Big projectable arm that throws mid-90s with a plus slider is usually a nice combo for a rising junior, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have McCullers on your top follow list?

Yeah, he's at the top. Out of mind since I haven't seen him this summer (all the guys I listed were on my USA rosters I had while at the car dealership this morning), but clearly one of the better arms in the class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been in on him. No idea about his tools. He's a big dude with a lot of swing-and-miss according to stat line. Don't know if there is reason to think he'll get better.

Diekroger is an athleticism play. What do you dislike outside of the slash line from last year?

What do you think of Appel if you aren't sold? Big projectable arm that throws mid-90s with a plus slider is usually a nice combo for a rising junior, no?

When I say I'm not high on one of these guys, it just means that they don't jump out at me as being elite picks. Not that I don't like what they have to offer. For example, I wasn't high on Barnes pre-season, wasn't high on him throughout the season, but would still love to have a Barnes-esque prospect and think Boston had a fantastic draft. I guess I just mean I'm not high relative to the praise I see elsewhere.

I like Appel a ton and think he's a legit first-half of the first-round pick, just have a feeling he won't be the first college pitcher on my board when all is said and done. I hold him to a higher standard because he's being called the cream of the crop. Really like the stuff and frame, just curious why he didn't miss more bats last year with K numbers up throughout the conference in general.

Diekroeger is a scout's pick. You can dream on him turning into something special, but a sub .100 ISO-P concerns me, particularly from a guy who might end up at third base. I know he showed well at the Area Code games out of high school, was selected in the 2nd round by Tampa Bay, and had a phenomenal freshman season, but when a kid's ISO-P drops below 100 and BA drops below 300 the year the new bats are implemented, it's a red flag to me. I'm not ruling him out, but I need to see more next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I say I'm not high on one of these guys, it just means that they don't jump out at me as being elite picks. Not that I don't like what they have to offer. For example, I wasn't high on Barnes pre-season, wasn't high on him throughout the season, but would still love to have a Barnes-esque prospect and think Boston had a fantastic draft. I guess I just mean I'm not high relative to the praise I see elsewhere.

I like Appel a ton and think he's a legit first-half of the first-round pick, just have a feeling he won't be the first college pitcher on my board when all is said and done. I hold him to a higher standard because he's being called the cream of the crop. Really like the stuff and frame, just curious why he didn't miss more bats last year with K numbers up throughout the conference in general.

Diekroeger is a scout's pick. You can dream on him turning into something special, but a sub .100 ISO-P concerns me, particularly from a guy who might end up at third base. I know he showed well at the Area Code games out of high school, was selected in the 2nd round by Tampa Bay, and had a phenomenal freshman season, but when a kid's ISO-P drops below 100 and BA drops below 300 the year the new bats are implemented, it's a red flag to me. I'm not ruling him out, but I need to see more next season.

Oh, okay. Sounds more like a "I don't know, I need to see more" than a "I'm not high on him". Fair enough.

As an aside, I think a lot of stat analysis using last year is going to lead to some bad assumptions being made -- particularly in the bloggosphere -- but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, okay. Sounds more like a "I don't know, I need to see more" than a "I'm not high on him". Fair enough.

As an aside, I think a lot of stat analysis using last year is going to lead to some bad assumptions being made -- particularly in the bloggosphere -- but that's just me.

Poor wording on my part I guess.

BTW, I absolutely agree re: statistical analysis of 2011. We simply don't have enough data to draw inferences about loss in production due to bats, which I hardly intended to do. I simply said that it's a concern. A strong showing in 2012 could go a long way toward easing my doubts about Diekroeger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
    • It is probably thin because of the short career lifespan is for those positions, which is why there is no way Mullins should be extended.
    • Gunnar Henderson's splits through first 97 ABs of the season:   Home -- .326 / .385 / .630 Away -- .294 / .362 / .667 Vs. LH -- .324 / .395 / .622 Vs. RH -- .300 / .358 / .667
    • I don't think the point was to trash Holliday but to question the reliability of the metric. I share the question about Holliday's OAA. He hasn't been bad but I can't think of a single plus play and OAA thinks he is the best defender on the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...