Results 1 to 15 of 110
07-11-2011 03:42 PM #1
Two part Melewski interview with AM about international operations.
Some of it sounded good, some of it was unsettling, one line was confusing.
my suspicion is our budget is bigger this year than it was last year.
Part 1- http://www.masnsports.com/steve_mele...l-efforts.html
Part 2- http://www.masnsports.com/steve_mele...l-efforts.html
07-11-2011 03:53 PM #2Plus Member Since 10/12 Major League Starter
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Quick summary: MacPhail is convinced that big bonuses for very young Dominicans are unwarranted, and he's being pretty clear about it. He also seems fine with spreading some money out among several smaller-profile guys who have been scouted in games.
This quote annoys the heck out of me:
Originally Posted by Andy Macphail
07-11-2011 03:54 PM #3Plus Member Since January 2009 Major League Starter
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Hampton, VA
Some real head scratchers in that interview. One really stuck out to me:
"It's me. I am just not big on throwing $4 or $5 million at a guy that has just been at tryout camps that you haven't had a chance to see in a competitive environment."
But we'll give 15+ million to Vlad and D. Lee? That's not a risk? Also, how about actually trying to see them in a competitive environment?
This mindset is why we will never succeed in the AL East. Sure - Angelos is the majority of the problem but if AM is this risk-averse to international talent then we are screwed.
Last edited by Burg; 07-11-2011 at 03:58 PM.
07-11-2011 03:54 PM #4
Yikes. AM did not come off well in that interview.
"I would remind you we found (Alfredo) Simon in Mexico and Koji (Uehara) from Japan and they count for something. I said it out there in front of our season ticket holders. I am not ready to commit $4 million to a player that is just in tryout camps. I don't think it's a good place to spend your $4 million. Spend your $4 million elsewhere.
He also mentions "not wanting to spend $4 million on one guy" a lot. We get it!
And where else have you spent that $4 million, Andy? Garrett Atkins? Gonzalez? Gregg? Lee? Vlad? Yeah -- great way of spending that $4 mil.
"They come out July 2, a spate of signings right now. It's just not in our vocabulary to do that. I don't doubt that the kid is impressive as hell in batting practice. It might translate, it may not. To me, again, this is a product of being close to 60 years old and growing up in the game the way I did. I just don't see this as a good idea."
"Yeah and we are not excluding ourselves from it. We are excluding ourselves from a very small percentage of that 33 percent. I haven't done the study, but you ought to do the study of how many of those $4 or $5 million dollar players, how are they doing?"
"The other spending compared to our opponents in the division, as it relates to Boston and New York, is in the major league payroll. We are just not going to, neither is Tampa and Toronto, I'm not sure about Toronto for sure down the road, but we are just not going to have a $200 million payroll."
"Dave (Stockstill) is running our efforts there and we are getting pretty reasonable results.
"If you want to put $5 million down on batting practice, have at it. Now, in three years, if I'm wrong and I see that's where you should be, then we'll be there. But I am going to need to see proof that I am wrong, that's all."
07-11-2011 03:56 PM #5
My favorite part is his not-so blatant admission that he understocks the international department staff:
What do you mean American evaluators? Some of your own amateur scouts?
"Or player development guys. So if an infield rover, for example, goes over to the Dominican, we will make sure he sees some guys we are looking at that are middle infielders. If the pitching rover goes over, we will make sure he sees some arms. If (hitting instructor) Denny Walling goes over, we look at some bats.
"Where I am really headed with this is we just seem to be more American-centric with our cross-checking."
07-11-2011 04:16 PM #6
"You could say maybe I'm conservative or time may have passed me by. I'm a product of the old days, whatever, but I just don't think that's a good bet.
"A guy like (Seattle's Michael) Pineda, that is throwing 87 (mph) and then, in about a year or two they are throwing 97 because they are growing and westernized diets or whatever. I think you can expect more of that from us this year.
He wraps it up here:
"It's me. I am just not big on throwing $4 or $5 million at a guy that has just been at tryout camps that you haven't had a chance to see in a competitive environment.""The absence of those big signings doesn't mean an absence of interest or work on our part."
Q: You have said the O's are spending more than the other American League East teams from 2007-2010 in the domestic June draft, but in international, where would your spending rank in the division?
"A: In the division, I don't know, but I can tell you last year, with international, we were roughly about 17th or so out of 30. The reason we are there (and not higher) is because we are not dropping $4 million on one guy."
Q: Didn't Texas just sign a player for $5 million that maybe they had not seen in a game, just in batting practice?
A: "They come out July 2, a spate of signings right now. It's just not in our vocabulary to do that. I don't doubt that the kid is impressive as hell in batting practice. It might translate, it may not. To me, again, this is a product of being close to 60 years old and growing up in the game the way I did. I just don't see this as a good idea."
Q: Isn't it also true that somewhere around 30 percent of major league rosters are international players? Isn't that a significant chunk of talent?
A: "Yeah and we are not excluding ourselves from it. We are excluding ourselves from a very small percentage of that 33 percent. I haven't done the study, but you ought to do the study of how many of those $4 or $5 million dollar players, how are they doing?"
Q: Were the O's one of the finalists for Miguel Sano?
A: "Yeah. What we did with Sano is we valued him where we thought he'd go in the draft and made an offer commensurate with that, and he did better."
Q: So what he signed for was more than your final offer?
A: "Yeah, by a good margin. Not that we were lowballing him, but by a good margin. We had the advantage of having Sano in our camp playing games. So we went out and made a first-round type of offer, but where we would have thought he'd go in the first round. He said, 'I can do better,' and he did it."
Q: You yourself said, "Maybe it's me, my generation." Do you ever think about that, that a younger general manager might say we must be doing more than this on the international front?
A: "If you want to put $5 million down on batting practice, have at it. Now, in three years, if I'm wrong and I see that's where you should be, then we'll be there. But I am going to need to see proof that I am wrong, that's all."
07-11-2011 04:16 PM #7Released Released
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Hallowell, ME
I would hope there isn't a doubt that MacPhail should not be back in 2012 now after reading these comments.
This just shows you how much of the game has passed him by and how fast he's turning into another Syd Thrift.
His views on the international market are biased and outdated and he's not willing to do the research to even see if he's right. That sounds a lot like Thrift used to.
Last edited by JTrea81; 07-11-2011 at 04:19 PM.
07-11-2011 04:17 PM #8
07-11-2011 04:17 PM #9
Judging by these posts, I'm not going to waste my time reading this article because I feel no need to become more angry than I already am.
This is what he's saying..."Hey O's fans. We stink, and we will continue to stink because I'm old school and I ain't changing for nothin'."
07-11-2011 04:21 PM #10
07-11-2011 04:44 PM #11Hangout Blogger Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Bethesda MD
I want to make my position on this crystal clear -- I am not saying that MacPhail is correct. But the fact that he isn't choosing to do what some other teams are doing certainly doesn't make him wrong. Only time will tell.
And, it is too simplistic to say, "the Orioles have poor record in bringing in Latin American talent, therefore MacPhail must be doing it wrong." MacPhail hasn't been here that long, and the main results of his Latin strategy won't be known for several more years.
Again, I'm not defending the strategy, just saying that we don't really know yet if it is right or wrong.
07-11-2011 04:48 PM #12
What frustrates me the most isn't that MacPhail isn't spending top dollar for international players, it's that he hasn't replaced that void with anything else to give the O's an advantage.
07-11-2011 04:53 PM #13GCL O's
- Join Date
- May 2011
I dont understand why McPhail completely dismisses the benefits of conducting a workout vs watching the player in a live game situation. In a game situation a player will have around 4 or 5 at bats and maybe 3 plays in the field. How many games does he think are required to get an idea of what type of player a person is. I would argue that you can get a better look at that player by having an intensive workout. Bring in pitching prospects that you are looking at to provide adequate competition. Put him thru tough fielding drills. McPhail makes it seem that the rangers are drafting players who only participated in a home run derby.
07-11-2011 05:04 PM #14Released Released
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Hallowell, ME
Don't we sign guys all the time based on bullpen sessions or workouts? Like Justin Duchscherer, Steve Trachsel and Adam Eaton to name a few?
And yet we are willing to sign a potentially washed up vet with a workout and not a 16-17 year old kid?
07-11-2011 05:04 PM #15