+ Reply to Thread
Results 121 to 135 of 512
-
12-08-2011 12:42 PM #121
Eveland
5.52 ERA
1.69 WHIP
4.5 BB/9
5.9 K/9
Reyes
6.05 ERA
1.63 WHIP
3.9 BB/9
5.8 K/9
Jakubauskus
5.58 ERA
1.45 WHIP
3.0 BB/9
5.4 K/9
Tony, we just traded for a JoJo Reyes and Chris Jakubausku clone. 29.2 IP of decent baseball doesn't make Eveland any better than either of those guys.
-
12-08-2011 12:43 PM #122
Wow, that's pretty wrong. Where was your outrage when we had Jo Jo Reyes starting for us last year? Eveland is not garbage and you are being ridiculously childish in this thread. When was the last time you seen him pitch? Give me your personal scouting reports of his stuff? Oh wait, you can't. But you have no problem going off on these childish rants where you call guys garbage and trash and everything else. By the way superstar, Eveland was in the major leagues at the same age of Martin.
-
12-08-2011 12:44 PM #123
Next up: Fielder!!!!!!
-
12-08-2011 12:44 PM #124
Unless they are swinging him to the airport to go pick up Fielder's luggage and drive him to the Warehouse to sign the contract than I don't think wherever Eveland is going will impact the O's reaching that crackhead's dream Duquette was blabbering about playing .500 ball this year.
-
12-08-2011 12:44 PM #125
I would have much rather acquired Slowey, who was traded for a PTBNL.
-
12-08-2011 12:45 PM #126
-
12-08-2011 12:45 PM #127
Moderator
Hangout Staff
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Catonsville
- Posts
- 18,224
It's probably not a coincidence that this trade was consummated the day after Bill Castro was hired as bullpen coach. Castro worked with Eveland when he came up with Milwaukee, so I'm betting this was his suggestion (just as Teagarden was Buck's suggestion).
Seems like Duquette is aggressively going after players his coaches want. I think he misjudged Eveland's value, though. You don't need to trade anything, let alone 2 players, for a spare-part AAAA arm like him, especially when he was likely going to be non-tendered.
-
12-08-2011 12:45 PM #128
Not if you go off the pitch value numbers and the success he had last year. Maybe he's a guy like Bruce Chen who or Jamie Moyer who took a little time to figure it out? I'm not saying the guy is anything super, but the more I look into his numbers and pitch values the more I see a guy who improved last year. He's worth a C- level prospect like Martin in my opinion, even if he's major league depth.
-
12-08-2011 12:45 PM #129
Plus Member Since 09/03
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Bethesda MD
- Posts
- 58,593
It is silly to assume that the Orioles have penciled Eveland into the rotation, or that they traded for him based on some small sample of his work. Besides, you seem to be suggesting there is a way "the Orioles" do things, but Duquette just got here and his advisors are different from MacPhail's, so you really know nothing about how he operates. I think it is likely that the new Director of Amateur Scouting, who was doing pro scouting for Boston, Texas and Toronto for the last 9 years, is probably having some input here.
-
12-08-2011 12:46 PM #130
O-R-I-O-L-E-S!!! Magic, magic, ORIOLESMAGICHEARITHAPPEN!!!!
....something magic happens....
PLAYOFF TICKETS BABY, WOOHOO!!!!
-
12-08-2011 12:46 PM #131
What is it with the O's trading for guys with chicks' names? Taylor Teagarden, Dana Eveland. Sounds like dolls that little girls are asking Santa to bring.
-
12-08-2011 12:46 PM #132
-
12-08-2011 12:47 PM #133
I'm not really bugged about who we traded to get him, it's that we traded to get him at all. He's going to take up 1 of the 25 positions we go north with in April. And I edited the post you quoted...I am not ready to elevate Eveland over either of the guys I mentioned off of 29.2 "decent" innings last year.
-
12-08-2011 12:47 PM #134
-
12-08-2011 12:47 PM #135
Moderator
Hangout Staff
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Catonsville
- Posts
- 18,224




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks