Jump to content

HHP: Do you agree with DD not handing our young pitchers automatic spots in the rotation?


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Given the inventory we've built this offseason (and the poll I posted, which indicates most of you think we're not done on this front yet), it'd seem some of our young guns won't start the season in Baltimore as they have in years past. Either that or they'll start the season in the bullpen.

Do you support this idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Given the inventory we've built this offseason (and the poll I posted, which indicates most of you think we're not done on this front yet), it'd seem some of our young guns won't start the season in Baltimore as they have in years past. Either that or they'll start the season in the bullpen.

Do you support this idea?

No, I think it is a better idea to just hand rotation spots to underserving and unmotivated young pitchers -sarcasm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I see it there are seven SPs you could argue for the OD rotation:

Guthrie

Britton

Arrieta

Matusz

Hunter

Wada

Chen

Others like Bergesen, Tillman, and Simon may have a chance of making starts at some point in the season but should either be in the bullpen or the minors on Opening Day unless there is an injury disaster.

Guthrie of course is a lock if not traded. The "extra" SPs we have right now may placate those who are worried about trading Guthrie.

Arrieta and Britton should be given spots. They both showed signs of promise last year and seem to be the two surest bets for future success.

The last two spots should be up for grabs in spring training. I would hope for Matusz and Chen earning those spots. Wada and Hunter in the bullpen. If Matusz looks anything like his '09 or '10 self I am giving him a rotation spot even if his spring training isn't wowing with the stats.

It does look like we have the best group of SP options in recent years but I have learned to be very hesitant in proclaiming that our depth will save the day later in the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't make much sense to me either, but I don't think some people are happy with this idea. *shrugs*

But...but...we need to "see what we got" with our young players. They should be given at least two full seasons at the ML level regardless of outcome to generate a large enough sample size so we don't risk the horror of possibly misidentifying the true potential of one of them. Right?

No, I'm not serious, but I wish I had a nickel for every time I hear an argument similar to this on the subject of struggling young players.

If the burden is on the young player to demonstrate he deserves a major league job, I think that's generally a healthy thing. There's room to make the occasional exception (Wieters) when common sense tells you it's warranted. It's time for the major league club to get out of the development business except for finishing touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree if we had or he was bringing in high ceiling pitching that will matter long term...But that's not really happening with the potential exception of Chen.

Now, if a guy like BMat goes to ST and still looks awful, then of course he should be sent down.

But he should go into ST with a spot in the rotation but its tenuous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Guthrie(if he isn't traded)

Britton

Chen

Wada

should be in the rotation. If Arrieta is healthy he should be too. But if any of Matusz, Hunter, Eveland, show well in ST, then they could move Wada to the pen. If Guthrie is traded or Arrieta isn't fully recovered that leaves an extra spot to compete for. I think Matusz has a lot to prove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree if we had or he was bringing in high ceiling pitching that will matter long term...But that's not really happening with the potential exception of Chen.

Now, if a guy like BMat goes to ST and still looks awful, then of course he should be sent down.

But he should go into ST with a spot in the rotation but its tenuous.

Yeah how about everyone goes in with a spot in the rotation and in the spring they will win there job or lose their job....May the best five start the season...And the next two will be starting no later than June.

This team hasn't had the 8 Major League starting quality pitchers we need to have a legit Major League staff in 14 years...We might actually be getting close to one next year...Starting to get pumped about this season.

Come On DD give us 2/3 more good impactful moves this offseason and I think your ready for ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I see it there are seven SPs you could argue for the OD rotation:

Guthrie

Britton

Arrieta

Matusz

Hunter

Wada

Chen

Others like Bergesen, Tillman, and Simon may have a chance of making starts at some point in the season but should either be in the bullpen or the minors on Opening Day unless there is an injury disaster.

Guthrie of course is a lock if not traded. The "extra" SPs we have right now may placate those who are worried about trading Guthrie.

Arrieta and Britton should be given spots. They both showed signs of promise last year and seem to be the two surest bets for future success.

The last two spots should be up for grabs in spring training. I would hope for Matusz and Chen earning those spots. Wada and Hunter in the bullpen. If Matusz looks anything like his '09 or '10 self I am giving him a rotation spot even if his spring training isn't wowing with the stats.

It does look like we have the best group of SP options in recent years but I have learned to be very hesitant in proclaiming that our depth will save the day later in the season.

Agree with the bolded! Britton did everything he needed to to get a second year. Pitched well to start, struggled when the league adjusted, and he adjusted back later.

Jake too. I have high hopes for him this year. He improved a lot of his problem areas (improved but not completely fixed...) and this will be the first year in a long time he has pitched without the bone chips.

But I do agree with Lex's thread. It's always a good idea to create REAL competition for roster spots. Even for Jake and Zach. All of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the inventory we've built this offseason (and the poll I posted, which indicates most of you think we're not done on this front yet), it'd seem some of our young guns won't start the season in Baltimore as they have in years past. Either that or they'll start the season in the bullpen.

Do you support this idea?

YES. No one - in a healthy organization - should be "handed" anything on an ML roster. We've been knighting these kids prematurely for more than 10 years now. DD seems to have a much more realistic understanding of the difference between "potential" and winning at the ML level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES. No one - in a healthy organization - should be "handed" anything on an ML roster. We've been knighting these kids prematurely for more than 10 years now. DD seems to have a much more realistic understanding of the difference between "potential" and winning at the ML level.

Remember he almost sounded appalled that some of the cavalry hadn't done a full season at AA. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree if we had or he was bringing in high ceiling pitching that will matter long term...But that's not really happening with the potential exception of Chen.

Now, if a guy like BMat goes to ST and still looks awful, then of course he should be sent down.

But he should go into ST with a spot in the rotation but its tenuous.

So you don't like the idea of bringing in competition for guys like Matusz to make them have to work that much harder in the offseason knowing that a spot isn't guaranteed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree if we had or he was bringing in high ceiling pitching that will matter long term...But that's not really happening with the potential exception of Chen.

Now, if a guy like BMat goes to ST and still looks awful, then of course he should be sent down.

But he should go into ST with a spot in the rotation but its tenuous.

I don't know, we kept on waiting for DCab to show his stuff year after year and we all know how that turned out.

I mean, I don't wanna deny the kids their chance to play in the major and show their stuff... I just think they need to show something first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was and still am a Means defender.   Velocity is not John's game.   In 2019 his average 4 seamer was 91.7 mph.   But his changeup was 80.9 mph and his curve was 77 mph according to Statcast.  John went 12-11 with a 3.60 ERA that year.   Its the different in the speeds of the pitches that makes John effective. According to the information I found about a Texas pitcher in 2022 come off TJ surgery the O's can and I think probably will apply to MLB for another month of rehab in 10 day increments.   John's comeback story is far from over IMO.
    • Count me in I was there, see above post.
    • We stole two of the three games against KC when they came to Baltimore two weeks ago, and everybody knows it. My guess is they'll have a chip on their shoulder about that. They out-hit us and out-homered us in our own park, and an unlucky bounce here or there and we could have been swept. I know the Brewers blew us out two of three, but IMO the Royals are the best team we've face so far. I'm expecting to lose a couple in KC but wouldn't be surprised if we lost all three.  
    • Different times. The Champion 1894 Orioles averaged about 165-170 pounds a man, and Big Dan Brouthers weighed in at 207. At least according to bb-ref.
    • Copying and pasting from my phone which isn’t ideal.      Speed is the name of the game. Just as major-league teams are working on models that can help them make decisions faster, so do public analysts trying to help people beat the line, win that overall prize, or at least beat their college friends in that fantasy league. In the effort to make better decisions faster, we have a few statistics that can aid our efforts: • Fastball velocity stabilizes quickly — three starts should reliably predict the rest of the season. • Relatedly, Stuff+ becomes meaningful after as little as one start, at least when it comes to fastballs and sliders. • Strikeout-minus-walk rate is one of the most powerful small-sample tools.   —————-   Burnes:   Stuff+ told us before the season that Burnes had a great curveball that he could feature more, so it shouldn't be a surprise that he's done exactly that in Baltimore. He's also seen his fastball velocity return to 2022 levels. The result has been vintage Burnes, at a time when it seems like all the aces are falling around him. Long-term park factors are funky in Baltimore — with the new dimensions, Burnes should easily put up a low-threes ERA with plenty of strikeouts.   —————— G-Rod:   Like with this teammate Burnes, you can expect Rodriguez to beat this ERA projection. He now has two fastballs and two secondaries that are elite in terms of physical characteristics, so it's a full arsenal. Even using last year's data to improve the sample size, he's shown above-average command of four pitches, too. The only question mark is the fact that he lacks a slider. The cutter isn't great — overuse of that pitch early last season is what got him in trouble — and he hasn't consistently thrown a hard breaking ball. Otherwise, he's golden Grayson.        
    • I tried to do some @Just Regularkinda writing in the opener
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...