+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: MLB.com Top 100: Machado #6, Bundy #10

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52

    Thumbs up MLB.com Top 100: Machado #6, Bundy #10

    The MLB.com Top 100 Prospect rankings were released today....
    http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/prospects/watch/y2012/index.jsp

    And here's their write-up specific to Orioles prospect rankings on the list....
    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...s_mlb&c_id=mlb

    Manny Machado (#6) and Dylan Bundy (#10) were the only two Orioles to make the list. Based on their 2B rankings, Schoop just barely missed.


  2. #2
    Lucky Jim's Avatar
    Lucky Jim is online now Plus Member since 12/06 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY.
    Posts
    15,959
    Quote Originally Posted by BobDylanBundy View Post
    The MLB.com Top 100 Prospect rankings were released today....
    http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/prospects/watch/y2012/index.jsp

    And here's their write-up specific to Orioles prospect rankings on the list....
    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?...s_mlb&c_id=mlb

    Manny Machado (#6) and Dylan Bundy (#10) were the only two Orioles to make the list. Based on their 2B rankings, Schoop just barely missed.
    I'm pretty shocked that Schoop didn't make it at all.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky Jim View Post
    I'm pretty shocked that Schoop didn't make it at all.
    I believe these rankings were mainly compiled by Jonathan Mayo, who seems to have some irrational prejudice against 2B prospects. The rankings are notable because Mayo has a more direct relationship with MLB scouting directors and scouts than most news sources, but obviously personal bias can still influence the list.

    Not one 2B made his list last season, and Corey Spangenberg (#81) was the only player at the position to make the list this year. Jurickson Profar (#7) and Anthony Rendon (#27) are more likely than not to end up at 2B if they're not traded, but wouldn't be surprised if they do not play a single inning at the position this year.

    At least Machado and Bundy ranked well! I was expecting both players to be around 15ish or worse.

  4. #4
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,169
    Quote Originally Posted by BobDylanBundy View Post
    I believe these rankings were mainly compiled by Jonathan Mayo, who seems to have some irrational prejudice against 2B prospects. The rankings are notable because Mayo has a more direct relationship with MLB scouting directors and scouts than most news sources, but obviously personal bias can still influence the list.

    Not one 2B made his list last season, and Corey Spangenberg (#81) was the only player at the position to make the list this year. Jurickson Profar (#7) and Anthony Rendon (#27) are more likely than not to end up at 2B if they're not traded, but wouldn't be surprised if they do not play a single inning at the position this year.

    At least Machado and Bundy ranked well! I was expecting both players to be around 15ish or worse.
    I don't agree with the bolded.

  5. #5
    Gurgi's Avatar
    Gurgi is offline Plus Member Since 6/05 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Glen Burnie
    Posts
    7,632
    Looking at this in a glass half full kinda way, you have to believe next year the Orioles should have a pretty decently ranked minor league system because neither of those guys will see the big leagues this season at all. We could possibly have two guys ranked in the top five next year.

  6. #6
    RZNJ's Avatar
    RZNJ is offline Plus member Since 04/03 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    28,274
    I watched the show last night. Tough to tell much about highlight clips but was impressed with Wheeler's mechanics and something strikes me funny about Bundy's. It doesn't seem as Bundy can throw as hard as is reported or maybe it just doesn't look like he's throwing that hard. I guess that's a good thing.

  7. #7
    eb45's Avatar
    eb45 is offline Aberdeen Reporter Major League Starter Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Halifax, NS
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by RZNJ View Post
    I watched the show last night. Tough to tell much about highlight clips but was impressed with Wheeler's mechanics and something strikes me funny about Bundy's. It doesn't seem as Bundy can throw as hard as is reported or maybe it just doesn't look like he's throwing that hard. I guess that's a good thing.
    Bundy has said repeatedly he never goes max effort in games. That's probably why it looks like he's not throwing his hardest.

  8. #8
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,169
    Bundy throws at around 80-85% in-game. Supposedly only reaches back for max effort in controlled situations where he is measuring his maxes.

  9. #9
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,169
    Wheeler's a stud.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lanham, MD
    Posts
    9,541
    Quote Originally Posted by BobDylanBundy View Post
    I believe these rankings were mainly compiled by Jonathan Mayo, who seems to have some irrational prejudice against 2B prospects. The rankings are notable because Mayo has a more direct relationship with MLB scouting directors and scouts than most news sources, but obviously personal bias can still influence the list.

    Not one 2B made his list last season, and Corey Spangenberg (#81) was the only player at the position to make the list this year. Jurickson Profar (#7) and Anthony Rendon (#27) are more likely than not to end up at 2B if they're not traded, but wouldn't be surprised if they do not play a single inning at the position this year.

    At least Machado and Bundy ranked well! I was expecting both players to be around 15ish or worse.
    That's pretty odd because Schoop actually could and would be playing SS if not for Machado, which I'm guessing would have put him on this list somewhere. Sure he'll end up at 2B or 3B later, but you could say the same thing about Manny possibly moving to 3B I guess. That being said it's not the first time I've heard that Schoop might JUST miss the top 100 list.

  11. #11
    Can_of_corn's Avatar
    Can_of_corn is online now Plus Member since 12/09 Hall of Fame Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,675
    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    That's pretty odd because Schoop actually could and would be playing SS if not for Machado, which I'm guessing would have put him on this list somewhere. Sure he'll end up at 2B or 3B later, but you could say the same thing about Manny possibly moving to 3B I guess. That being said it's not the first time I've heard that Schoop might JUST miss the top 100 list.
    I was thinking the same thing to myself. That if Schoop had played the season at SS he would have made the top 100. in the grand scheme of things it makes little difference if he made the list or not.

  12. #12
    LookinUp's Avatar
    LookinUp is offline Plus Member Since 6/08 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bubble
    Posts
    7,250
    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    That's pretty odd because Schoop actually could and would be playing SS if not for Machado, which I'm guessing would have put him on this list somewhere. Sure he'll end up at 2B or 3B later, but you could say the same thing about Manny possibly moving to 3B I guess. That being said it's not the first time I've heard that Schoop might JUST miss the top 100 list.
    Maybe I'm the only one who thinks Machado probably belongs in the 30ish range and Schoop in the 50ish range. I think they're off by a lot on both of them, but what do I know?

  13. #13
    Stotle's Avatar
    Stotle is offline Hangout Scouting Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    12,169
    Quote Originally Posted by LookinUp View Post
    Maybe I'm the only one who thinks Machado probably belongs in the 30ish range and Schoop in the 50ish range. I think they're off by a lot on both of them, but what do I know?
    I think Machado at 6 is a head-scratcher. You can argue Bundy in the top 10, but I probably wouldn't, considering the depth in the Minors now. I think Profar is a top 10 guy, with Machado and Lindor the next best shortstops. Machado better right now, as Lindor hasn't played any pro ball yet. But I wouldn't be surprised if Lindor looked to have the brighter future at this time next year.

  14. #14
    LookinUp's Avatar
    LookinUp is offline Plus Member Since 6/08 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bubble
    Posts
    7,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Stotle View Post
    I think Machado at 6 is a head-scratcher. You can argue Bundy in the top 10, but I probably wouldn't, considering the depth in the Minors now. I think Profar is a top 10 guy, with Machado and Lindor the next best shortstops. Machado better right now, as Lindor hasn't played any pro ball yet. But I wouldn't be surprised if Lindor looked to have the brighter future at this time next year.
    Hype gets you a long way. If Machado is an exceptional hitter and a natural fielder SS, I suppose he belongs that high. I'm just not sold on the small sample of hot hitting followed by a less impressive stretch that admittedly ended up hot again. At #6, I want a guy who has already built a track record or is off the charts physically/tools (e.g., Bundy, Harper). Machado's best tool, IMO, is his feel for the game. Dude's a baseball rat. That gives me some confidence that he will end up playing well even if he ends up a 3B with an average hit tool. I'm just not sure that means he'll turn into a superstar. He'll need to hit at or above many of his projections AND stick at SS to be that guy.

    Schoop, OTOH, seems to have the rankers lagging, IMO. I think his hit tool is very legit and I trust his fielding. I think that he'll get more notice once he settles at a position and continues to hit in A+ and hopefully AA. I have a very good feeling that he will, and I think the prognosticators are lagging in that perception. Hopefully I'm right on this one. His best-case comp (if only in trajectory) is Robbie Cano.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by Stotle View Post
    I don't agree with the bolded.
    I guess you haven't read much by Jonathan Mayo then. The consolidated prospect cards are not very reflective of his quality of reporting, I'd recommend looking at some of his articles and videos.

    I'm skeptical of most prospect-based news sources which fall into two groups: "anonymous paraphrasers" and "copy and paste artists". Mayo, however, avoids both categories. In his articles, he's not one of those writers who throws down lots of assertions with no explanation as to where they're coming from.

    He does a good job of including exact quotes he himself has been told directly by scouting directors and scouts (frequently even specifically naming the sources). He's also posted plenty of video with commentary by scouting directors. There's no question he's privileged with direct access to key sources that most other sites don't have, which really is true of most MLB.com lead reporters (majors and minors).

    Quote Originally Posted by RZNJ View Post
    I watched the show last night. Tough to tell much about highlight clips but was impressed with Wheeler's mechanics and something strikes me funny about Bundy's. It doesn't seem as Bundy can throw as hard as is reported or maybe it just doesn't look like he's throwing that hard. I guess that's a good thing.
    Coincidentally, a fairly in-depth interview was just posted this morning comparing Bundy to Jameson Taillon. One of the areas in which Bundy was rated with a decisive edge was in fact cleaner mechanics at the same age.

    Bundy's mechanics are fine, and his height will not hold him back... the one potential concern is buildup, his workload would probably be considered irresponsible by traditional baseball theory.

    Bundy and his father, however, believe this is not a concern due to his training/conditioning program. A single player is not going to completely shift the landscape on his own. However, Bundy's success in avoiding injury will be a good test case that significantly calls into question (or, hopefully not, reinforces) traditional views on the correlation between SP workloads and injury risk.

    Three years from now, Mr. Bundy could replace Guthrie as the O's #1 starter.... and replace Brady Anderson as the team's designated fitness trainer.

    Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579 View Post
    That's pretty odd because Schoop actually could and would be playing SS if not for Machado, which I'm guessing would have put him on this list somewhere. Sure he'll end up at 2B or 3B later, but you could say the same thing about Manny possibly moving to 3B I guess. That being said it's not the first time I've heard that Schoop might JUST miss the top 100 list.
    I don't really have a problem with categorizing Schoop as a 2B: he played significantly more innings there than any other position, he's unlikely to see much time at SS due to Hardy/Machado, and he was horrendous playing 3B. If you have to bucket Schoop at a position, 2B would be the one - both current and long term.

    I do have a problem with "penalizing" prospects for playing 2B. Schoop isn't the only 2B prospect to be snubbed. Kolten Wong and Oscar Tejada are better prospects than some of the shortstops that made it. Even at the top of his 2B article, he says it's thought of (by who??) as the position for "failed shortstops" and "players who aren't legitimate prospects." Mayo is one of the better prospect reporters out there, but as far as his recent opinions involving 2B's are concerned it's as if Dustin Ackley stole his girlfriend.

    Quote Originally Posted by LookinUp View Post
    Maybe I'm the only one who thinks Machado probably belongs in the 30ish range and Schoop in the 50ish range. I think they're off by a lot on both of them, but what do I know?
    Machado belongs higher than 30ish - he's a SS/3B who hit well against older competition in his first full pro season after being the #3 pick. However, I do agree you want a bit more ceiling from a Top 10 prospect. Jhonny Peralta might be his closest Major League comp - definitely a valuable building block, but not the superstar you'd expect a Top 10 prospect to develop into.

    Quote Originally Posted by LookinUp View Post
    His best-case comp (if only in trajectory) is Robbie Cano.
    If that's true, then Cano is the best case trajectory for just about every teenage Latin American 2B. In terms of tools, skills, and physicality, not seeing many similarities between Cano and Schoop. I'm actually hoping for better plate discipline and 2B defense from Schoop, while I don't see how you could reasonably project him for consistent 70+ XBH power. I guess if fans are going to associate Machado and A-Rod, we need to be fair and connect Schoop with Cano.
    Last edited by BobDylanBundy; 01-26-2012 at 07:48 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2011 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us