+ Reply to Thread
Results 316 to 330 of 644
-
02-06-2012 01:25 PM #316
You know...my interest in the O's this year has stayed pretty strong despite the fact that this was a terrible offseason. I still have that excitement of watching the young guys grow into major league players...good or bad. This trade is like a kick to the chest. I can't imagine a positive spin. My interest is beginning to wane and spring training hasn't even started. This is not a move of a man that knows what he is doing as a GM. I thought maybe DD just was being selective and picky and waiting to truely evaulate talent before pulling the trigger but this trade is not good and shows Duquettes real ability in the business.
It is a sad day to be an O's fan...
-
02-06-2012 01:26 PM #317
This is really the only way to look at this deal that will allow us all to sleep better at night. If Hammel or Lindstom pitches well enough to garner a nice return at some point between now and 2014, DD will look like a genius. If they perform horribly, and net us nothing, it looks horrible.
-
02-06-2012 01:26 PM #318
-
02-06-2012 01:26 PM #319
Plus Member Since 4/10
Major Leagues
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- York PA
- Posts
- 756
-
02-06-2012 01:28 PM #320
Plus Member Since 4/10
Major Leagues
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- York PA
- Posts
- 756
I swear I am getting closer and closer to leaving the O's as my number 1 baseball team and I NEVER EVER thought I would even consider saying that.
-
02-06-2012 01:30 PM #321
-
02-06-2012 01:31 PM #322
It's interesting. I've been one of the few folks not praising Duquette for his restructuring and moves. But, I'll be honest, I see someone with a very clear, and very consistent approach to risk and value. It's different than MacPhail's, but there's a logic to it. Clearly, he thinks that there was a serious over-correction with regards to prospect value that occurred within the last five years. And, if DD is right, he really will be pushing an innovative, market-optimizing approach. I'm not sure how it will work out, but, as I said, it's at least interesting.
-
02-06-2012 01:31 PM #323
And, if Guthrie hits the wall and performs poorly, DD looks like a genius, too. Not every move has to be about 2015. We still have to play ball in 2012 and this move has the potential to make us better in 2012/2013 and if it comes to it, could net as many or more prospects than Guthrie would have, anyway. The pessimism seems grossly exagerated if not totally unwarrented.
-
02-06-2012 01:33 PM #324
Plus Member Since March 2010
All-Star
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 6,459
-
02-06-2012 01:34 PM #325
If the arb talks really had anything to do with this and if Buck wasnt JGs biggest fan, is this another example of PA and Buck running the ML team?
-
02-06-2012 01:35 PM #326
-
02-06-2012 01:36 PM #327
Aberdeen
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 140
Most of you have wanted change but change comes at a cost,you have to change the mentality of this group of players,that winning is better than losing.Guthrie for all his talent was 48-65 in five years as a oriole,it was time for a change.The trouble with most people on this site is that they over value the oriole players just like the scounts that were demoted,DD and the new front office look at the orioles with new fresh eyes and change will happen!
-
02-06-2012 01:36 PM #328
-
02-06-2012 01:36 PM #329
I think the probabilities of Guthrie, with $4m salary remaining, netting anything substantial at the deadline are very small. I think Hammel or even a hot Lindstrom netting something similar or better at the deadline because of their lower salaries are at least as high. The difference, I think, is you have 2 guys providing value instead of 1, and 2 guys who have a chance to provide value at this trade deadline, next offseason, or next trade deadline, instead of Guthrie only at this trade deadline.
It is possible that this trade ends up being a net negative, but it's also possible that it's a clear positive if both players return to previous performance levels and/or Guthrie's apparent decline (if only in my eyes) continues.
I really think people are over-valuing Guthrie here. Maybe I'm discounting the down side of these two players too much? Perhaps.
-
02-06-2012 01:37 PM #330
Guthrie himself has been a below-average pitcher either two or three of the last three years (depending on whether you believe in ERA or FIP). Hammel at least has some upside if he goes back to his pre-2011 levels, plus he and Lindstrom are under team control through 2013.
I can see not being a huge fan of the deal, but there's definitely the potential for at least a mildly positive outcome.


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks