1. #316
    oriole's Avatar
    oriole is offline Plus Member since 01/12 Major League Starter Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Catonsville, MD
    Posts
    1,255
    You know...my interest in the O's this year has stayed pretty strong despite the fact that this was a terrible offseason. I still have that excitement of watching the young guys grow into major league players...good or bad. This trade is like a kick to the chest. I can't imagine a positive spin. My interest is beginning to wane and spring training hasn't even started. This is not a move of a man that knows what he is doing as a GM. I thought maybe DD just was being selective and picky and waiting to truely evaulate talent before pulling the trigger but this trade is not good and shows Duquettes real ability in the business.

    It is a sad day to be an O's fan...

  2. #317
    Mr Snuffleupagus's Avatar
    Mr Snuffleupagus is offline Plus Member Since 12/11 Major League Starter Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Towson, MD
    Posts
    1,784
    Quote Originally Posted by DrungoHazewood View Post
    I think the answer is probably yes. Or at least close enough, with enough potential upside, to say yes. A compensation pick is only worth a few $million, and if Hammel pitches like it's 2009-2010 he's worth much more than that, above and beyond his salary.
    This is really the only way to look at this deal that will allow us all to sleep better at night. If Hammel or Lindstom pitches well enough to garner a nice return at some point between now and 2014, DD will look like a genius. If they perform horribly, and net us nothing, it looks horrible.

  3. #318
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miamisburg, OH
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldGlove21 View Post
    In this market Edwin Jackson got a 1/$10 deal. I am not interested in Guthrie at that rate. It was just a bad situation to be honest. Guthrie should have been moved or extended years ago. If Guthrie was making $7M this season I doubt that anyone would complain. The Orioles are in bad shape and I suppose this trade makes sense if I think about it hard enough.
    The trade still doesn't make sense for me BUT it is a fair trade IMO.

  4. #319
    helloharv is offline Plus Member Since 4/10 Major Leagues Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    York PA
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by Birdland View Post
    JonHeymanCBSJon Heyman

    i am finding some of #orioles moves this winter confounding, perplexing and just downright weird
    This should be on a 100 foot banner on the Warehouse

  5. #320
    helloharv is offline Plus Member Since 4/10 Major Leagues Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    York PA
    Posts
    756
    I swear I am getting closer and closer to leaving the O's as my number 1 baseball team and I NEVER EVER thought I would even consider saying that.

  6. #321
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miamisburg, OH
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by helloharv View Post
    I swear I am getting closer and closer to leaving the O's as my number 1 baseball team and I NEVER EVER thought I would even consider saying that.
    So this trade is sending you over the edge huh? Not the losing seasons, the horrible owner, horrible drafting/international presence, etc. Worse has happened and I'm sure will happen. Hang in there.

  7. #322
    Lucky Jim's Avatar
    Lucky Jim is offline Plus Member since 12/06 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY.
    Posts
    18,008
    It's interesting. I've been one of the few folks not praising Duquette for his restructuring and moves. But, I'll be honest, I see someone with a very clear, and very consistent approach to risk and value. It's different than MacPhail's, but there's a logic to it. Clearly, he thinks that there was a serious over-correction with regards to prospect value that occurred within the last five years. And, if DD is right, he really will be pushing an innovative, market-optimizing approach. I'm not sure how it will work out, but, as I said, it's at least interesting.

  8. #323
    NCRaven's Avatar
    NCRaven is offline Plus Member since 11/05 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hampstead
    Posts
    5,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Snuffleupagus View Post
    This is really the only way to look at this deal that will allow us all to sleep better at night. If Hammel or Lindstom pitches well enough to garner a nice return at some point between now and 2014, DD will look like a genius. If they perform horribly, and net us nothing, it looks horrible.
    And, if Guthrie hits the wall and performs poorly, DD looks like a genius, too. Not every move has to be about 2015. We still have to play ball in 2012 and this move has the potential to make us better in 2012/2013 and if it comes to it, could net as many or more prospects than Guthrie would have, anyway. The pessimism seems grossly exagerated if not totally unwarrented.

  9. #324
    grimed1 is online now Plus Member Since March 2010 All-Star Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,464
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony-OH View Post
    This is exactly why I should never start to take up for an Orioles GM. The second I do they do something that makes me start scratching my head. This trade makes no sense for the future since it only buys one additional year of a pitcher that "might" be a good as Guthrie.

    This feels like a temper tantrum move. We don't like your arbitration number and you won't negotiate a settlement so I'm going to trade you for whatever I can get. I mean if it was Hammels and a prospect then maybe I could see this. But Hammels and a salary dump? Hell, at least he could have gotten the Rockies to take Gregg. This doesn't make the Orioles in the near term or long term. It makes little sense.
    Also he was the O's player rep.

  10. #325
    Sports Guy's Avatar
    Sports Guy is offline Plus Member Since 3/04 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    107,461
    If the arb talks really had anything to do with this and if Buck wasnt JGs biggest fan, is this another example of PA and Buck running the ML team?

  11. #326
    Lucky Jim's Avatar
    Lucky Jim is offline Plus Member since 12/06 Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY.
    Posts
    18,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Sports Guy View Post
    If the arb talks really had anything to do with this and if Buck wasnt JGs biggest fan, is this another example of PA and Buck running the ML team?
    My question is, if this is some fall-out from the sides playing hard-ball pre-arbitration, why did Guthrie sign a compromise $8.2m contract w/in a day?

  12. #327
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    140
    Most of you have wanted change but change comes at a cost,you have to change the mentality of this group of players,that winning is better than losing.Guthrie for all his talent was 48-65 in five years as a oriole,it was time for a change.The trouble with most people on this site is that they over value the oriole players just like the scounts that were demoted,DD and the new front office look at the orioles with new fresh eyes and change will happen!

  13. #328
    Os84's Avatar
    Os84 is offline Plus member since 1/12 Major Leagues Reputation
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dunkirk, MD
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by grimed1 View Post
    Also he was the O's player rep.
    Do you see any other trades on the horizon? Or just small FA acquisition(s)?

  14. #329
    LookinUp's Avatar
    LookinUp is offline Plus Member Since 6/08 All-Star Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Bubble
    Posts
    8,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony-OH View Post
    Perhaps, but I still think Guthrie had the potential to bring more in return for a team that might need that starter down the stretch. At best this trade is a wash. If you are going to do that then they might as well keep him under the potential that teams could offer more when they are desperate. If it doesn't happen,then you get a compensation pick, which still may have more long term benefits than Hammel and Lindstrom.
    I think the probabilities of Guthrie, with $4m salary remaining, netting anything substantial at the deadline are very small. I think Hammel or even a hot Lindstrom netting something similar or better at the deadline because of their lower salaries are at least as high. The difference, I think, is you have 2 guys providing value instead of 1, and 2 guys who have a chance to provide value at this trade deadline, next offseason, or next trade deadline, instead of Guthrie only at this trade deadline.

    It is possible that this trade ends up being a net negative, but it's also possible that it's a clear positive if both players return to previous performance levels and/or Guthrie's apparent decline (if only in my eyes) continues.

    I really think people are over-valuing Guthrie here. Maybe I'm discounting the down side of these two players too much? Perhaps.

  15. #330
    DrungoHazewood's Avatar
    DrungoHazewood is online now Hangout Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    31,076
    Quote Originally Posted by atomic View Post
    Now we are stuck paying below average players for 2013. I don't see any positive in this trade at all.
    Guthrie himself has been a below-average pitcher either two or three of the last three years (depending on whether you believe in ERA or FIP). Hammel at least has some upside if he goes back to his pre-2011 levels, plus he and Lindstrom are under team control through 2013.

    I can see not being a huge fan of the deal, but there's definitely the potential for at least a mildly positive outcome.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2013 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us