Jump to content

Bye Bye to Danny O'Brien?


Floater

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The interesting part here is that I saw yesterday that Locksley plans to run a pro-style offense, which would seem to be much more suited to DOB's strengths than what Crowton ran. Lord help us if they expect CJ Brown to be the QB in that kind of system. Might as well install the triple-option during spring practice now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing DOB would suck, but let's remember, as bad as the offense was last year, O'Brien was pretty bad as well. A bad offense doesn't make you inaccurate. I was hoping the change to Locksley would convince him to stay. Maybe he'll still stay, who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losing DOB would suck, but let's remember, as bad as the offense was last year, O'Brien was pretty bad as well. A bad offense doesn't make you inaccurate. I was hoping the change to Locksley would convince him to stay. Maybe he'll still stay, who knows?

But the flip side to that argument is the year before they changed the offense he was amazing, so I guess it's a chicken or the egg debate, did he have a bad year because of the changes and him not getting along with the coach, or was he just going to have a bad year either way? My money is on the coach who never should have been able to jump straight from UCONN to the ACC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the flip side to that argument is the year before they changed the offense he was amazing, so I guess it's a chicken or the egg debate, did he have a bad year because of the changes and him not getting along with the coach, or was he just going to have a bad year either way? My money is on the coach who never should have been able to jump straight from UCONN to the ACC.

Eh, he was good his freshman year, but I think it's overstated a bit. Had a completion percentage of 57%. He did have a nice TD/INT ratio, particualry for a freshman. But he also had Torrey Smith on that team, who caught 12 of his 22 TDs.

I admit I am using hindsight, but just as there was reason to be enthusiastic about DOB going into last year, there was also reason to temper some of that enthusiasm.

I am with Tony. I would hate for DOB to leave, but he is not the MD program. If he goes, we'll see a lot o CJB and the two freshmen coming in will certainly be licking their chops.

BTW, I don't think it is at all a given that he would transfer to Vanderbilt. I think James Franklin is pretty happy with Jordan Rodgers, DOB would not waltz right in there as QB1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DOB is a decent QB who had one pretty good year and one not so good year. I'm not sure why he gets so overrated...maybe it's because he was surrounded by so little talent that he seemed better than he was (sort of like the least ugly girl in a group of really ugly girls). He would have been better in a pro style offense than he was in whatever that offense was the ran last year. But he's not the second coming of Peyton Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agreed.  But that X post was by a CHW fan, so I'll allow it.
    • No one thought Burnes was an option.  I think pretty much everyone would have taken the Burns deal over the proposed Cease deals.
    • You'd have Mateo. I'd prefer to save him for pinch-running though.  Of course, I'd have just let O'Hearn hit. My suggestion was just for those who think the world would end if O'Hearn batted against a LHP.   
    • Honestly, I could see the decision either way.  O’Hearn is a hot hitter historically vulnerable to lefties.   Hays historically hits lefties well but has been as cold as you can get.  He’s a significant defensive upgrade to O’Hearn for the rest of the game.  So what do you do? If my only concern was to maximize the chance to win today’s game, I’d probably stick with O’Hearn, for a reason not mentioned yet.  This was the leadoff batter in the 7th inning, and if anyone gets on base the next three innings, that means the batter will get one more AB after the one in the 7th inning, and decent chance that AB will be against a RHP.   So, that favors leaving O’Hearn in. At the same time, I don’t believe that maximizing the chance to win this game was the only consideration.  Simply put, Hyde wants to keep Hays involved in things, and wants to give him opportunities to break out of his slump.  And that’s important for the long term benefit of the team.   So, as I see it, it’s a close call, and I wouldn’t criticize Hyde either way.  We won the game so I’m certainly not going to obsess about it.    
    • Remember when we used to be on the other side of this ledger? How easy some forget. We don’t have to put others down to prop ourselves up. I hope we don’t become that annoying/arrogant fanbase who likes to run others’ noses in it.
    • Probably as tough a night as Bradish's yesterday was encouraging.   I think it'll be found some persistent aspect of the injury he's now rehabbing is somehow at the root of this ineffectiveness....otherwise I'm not sure what happens when the rehab assignment clock runs out.
    • Enos and Brit were talking about Lindor's slow start recently.  As part of the discussion Enos said that players tend to swing less in the first month and pitchers can rake advantage of that.  I wonder if the Sigbot is arbitraging that with more aggressive PAs?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...