+ Reply to Thread
Results 46 to 60 of 176
-
03-10-2012 09:00 PM #46
-
03-10-2012 09:37 PM #47
Norfolk
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 493
I think you are right on target. They made out like bandits and there would have been no reason to risk throwing this away for a potential slightly better deal and then losing out on this haul.
Typical Daniel Snyder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
But, on the other hand, when you have Rex and Beck in your stable, and, know Peyton has no interest in coming to play for you . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
03-11-2012 12:56 PM #48
Plus Member Since 09/03
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Bethesda MD
- Posts
- 58,533
I like the move. I think that because of his speed and athletic ability, RGIII will be no worse than a middle-of-the-pack NFL starting QB, and he has a decent chance to be elite. If he's elite, it's a good move, and if he's middle-of-the-pack, it's still not awful considering that the 'Skins were bottom-of-the-pack at QB before this. It's really only a disaster if RGIII isn't a solid NFL starting QB, but as I said, I doubt that will be the case.
Now, from the Rams' standpoint, this is an incredible coup. They already have Bradford and now they have a ton of picks to surround him with talent over the next 3 years.
-
03-11-2012 02:05 PM #49
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
And about 40M in cap room can help address some of those other holes.
Maybe Vincent Jackson to go along with Moss, Hankerson, and 2-3 of Armstrong, Gaffney, Austin, Paul, Stallworth, etc.
Perhaps Carr or another good CB. Maybe 1-2 OL upgrades. Possibly a NT. And of course they have to either bring back or replace Fletcher and Landry.
-
03-11-2012 02:12 PM #50
Yeah I agree with you here. STL is the big winner, but a half way decent career will be a better QB than we have had since the 80's. The only concern I have about RG3 is his playing style, to a degree it's why I'm not afraid to play against Mike Vick, because at some point he's going to scramble and you're going to get a good shot in on him, once you do...he's out. Just hoping he has the impact Cam Newton had last year.
They've got some solid RBs now, should be set at TE for a year or two. I'd say another CB to play with Hall and Wilson, possibly a S to replace Landry, resigning Fletcher, and maybe another OL would be a long way towards competing.
-
03-11-2012 02:13 PM #51
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
With all that said regarding potential upgrades along with a good D already in place, if Griffin plays at least decently early, those two first round picks may be over 30 when added together (12, 20 for example). That won't be that steep of a price if RGIII is quite good.
The Giants weren't exactly decimated by trading up for Eli, and he wasn't even a good QB until last year.
-
03-11-2012 02:14 PM #52
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
-
03-11-2012 03:43 PM #53
The comparison to Vick to Newton are pretty annoying at this point. They are all the same race and can run a bit. That's it. All of their throwing styles are much different, plus Rg3 is pass first all the way.
-
03-11-2012 04:19 PM #54
Plus Member
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 10,362
Another thing I do not like about this move is that we don't know where Manning is going to land. I don't want Tebow or Mark Sanchez, but it's possible Manning lands in a place where we could have picked up a QB much cheaper.
-
03-11-2012 04:47 PM #55
-
03-11-2012 04:47 PM #56
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
-
03-11-2012 04:48 PM #57
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
-
03-11-2012 04:53 PM #58
Comparison to Vick because of the speed (also ran a 4.3). Comparison to Newton in throwing style (pocket passer first and pretty similar to RG3). So really...tantrum unnecessary. Oh and by the way, with 179 rushing attempts and 402 pass attempts, that is FAR from pass first, that's almost a run for every 2 passes.
-
03-11-2012 04:59 PM #59
I think that is more of a reflection on the efficient player he is. He doesn't force plays. See his 72% Completion Rate and 6 interceptions. If the pass is not there, he is not going to try and force and pass in there that ends up in an interception( ala Rex Grossman). Instead, he will try to get the most yards he can in the most efficient way if the pass is not there, which would be running for some yards. He is a pass first guy.
-
03-11-2012 05:23 PM #60
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Camden, DE
- Posts
- 25,611
Last edited by mweb; 03-12-2012 at 01:21 PM.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks