+ Reply to Thread
Results 16 to 30 of 266
Thread: Jason Hammel Today
-
04-08-2012 06:05 PM #16
Ironically, the fact that you were at the game and in such a great seat (behind home plate) actually spared you some of the anxiety that the rest of us had that were watching on our TV's and our computers. We knew immediately that it was Gregg, thanks to the cameras and the announcers. You could kind of kid yourself into thinking that maybe it wasn't really him warming up.
-
04-08-2012 06:06 PM #17
I was right at 3b and Betemit looked pretty smooth out there, nice to have someone that can give Mark a break to "collect" his thoughts
-
04-08-2012 06:11 PM #18
Loving Jerry Adair. Noticed something in Hammel's delivery, tweaked his mechanics and turned his two-seamer into a sinker. 2 weeks ago.
That's a pitching coach.
-
04-08-2012 06:17 PM #19
-
04-08-2012 06:23 PM #20
Ha. I meant Rick (Jerry played for the O's in the 60s. 2nd base).
And yes, it's Adair, not Petersen:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/o...,5695514.story
-
04-08-2012 08:28 PM #21
-
04-08-2012 08:32 PM #22
I was there, first game in two years. Section 228, club level, looking over homeplate and right down the left field line. Great seats.
Right off the bat, it looked to me like the ump had a generous strike zone, particularly on the high strike and the outside corner. I felt it would be a low scoring game because of this. Hammel was incredible. He was obviously gassed in the 8th. I was spared the anxiety of Greg warming up, it was too far to see who it was. That would have been agony seeing him coming in. I was shocked that Buck didn't come out and now I'm glad he didn't.
I loved the double steal. I certainly wasn't expecting that. The Twins should have gone after Johnson as the tail end rather than going for Jones.
Everyone on the team looked good. We hit a lot of balls hard after the starter left. A lot of at'em balls. With a little luck we would have blown it open.
Johnson looked awfully good in the ninth.
First place, undefeated, wire to wire here we go!!!
-
04-09-2012 12:06 AM #23
If Hammel keeps pitching like that, I'll be like, "Guthrie who?"
-
04-09-2012 12:12 AM #24
Can anyone speak as to how/why his 2-seamer/sinker had a greater velocity than his 4-seamer? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've gone through my baseball life under the belief that the 4-seam fastball consistently the faster pitch. I think I read that Buck attributed it to an uptick in adrenaline, and that it would perhaps fade as the season progressed, however, I was very surprised to see his 2-seamer move the way it did while coming in faster than his straight 4-seamer.
-
04-09-2012 12:47 AM #25
-
04-09-2012 01:36 AM #26
I know losses are not a particularly good measure of a pitcher. But, when you lead the league in losses over a three year period, that begins to say something. If Hammel tried to lose that much, it would be hard. At the time of the trade, I was glad to get 4 years of Hammel/Lindstrom over one year of Guthrie. And, if Hammel sucks his next time out, I'll still feel that way.
-
04-09-2012 01:40 AM #27
Love it when someone has to spread dog crap frosting on a perfectly good cake. You could wait for us to lose one game before you dump on a season opening sweep with three consecutive well pitched games. Yes, the Twins are bad. But, we did what you're supposed to do against bad teams.
-
04-09-2012 01:45 AM #28
-
04-09-2012 01:46 AM #29
-
04-09-2012 02:00 AM #30
Plus Members Since 9/11
All-Star
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- SOCAL
- Posts
- 8,159
Good observation. I didn't really notice/think about the 4 seamer that much myself. I was just impressed with the movement (and the command of the movement) on his fastball today. I think the theme for all three of the first three starters was a good moving (2 seam) fastball, though Hunter's velocity certainly wasn't there. Since Matusz is a 4 seam guy and Chen looks to be also (I could be wrong here), it'll be interesting to watch.



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks