+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910
Results 136 to 141 of 141
  1. #136
    DrungoHazewood's Avatar
    DrungoHazewood is offline Hangout Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    30,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Hallas View Post
    You could still game the definition by having low-rise uniform pants that ended halfway down your crack. The midpoint would drop to around your belly button.
    Yes! But it's going to be hard convincing Buck, I think that's in the same category as wearing you hat crooked. And don't even start with Trembley, that's not respecting the game!

  2. #137
    DrungoHazewood's Avatar
    DrungoHazewood is offline Hangout Contributor Hall of Fame Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    SoMd
    Posts
    30,730
    Quote Originally Posted by srock View Post
    This makes the most sense to me.

    Which means the big problem is how to make the system work really fast and not have downtime. Plus security so some hacker in the stands can't buzz strike calls wirelessly to the umpire

    Unless some military technology could be used as "Strike Zone Goggles" showing a heads up display of the 3-D strike zone for this particular batter and indicating the real time flight path of the ball.

    Cylon Umpires! Or maybe the Borg is a better nerd-alogy.
    Quantum encryption! You can make it hack-proof.

    And Cylons are always the better nerd-alogy. Is it wrong that my 3-year-old can do a heck of an old-school Cylon voice?

  3. #138
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in the LA area
    Posts
    2,507
    Quote Originally Posted by srock View Post
    This makes the most sense to me.

    Which means the big problem is how to make the system work really fast and not have downtime. Plus security so some hacker in the stands can't buzz strike calls wirelessly to the umpire

    Unless some military technology could be used as "Strike Zone Goggles" showing a heads up display of the 3-D strike zone for this particular batter and indicating the real time flight path of the ball.

    Cylon Umpires! Or maybe the Borg is a better nerd-alogy.
    Google is doing research on glasses that do this. It might be civillian technology that makes this possible, not military.

  4. #139
    callahan09's Avatar
    callahan09 is offline Plus Member Since 9/12 Major Leagues Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Jersey City, NJ
    Posts
    807
    Quote Originally Posted by srock View Post
    This makes the most sense to me.

    Which means the big problem is how to make the system work really fast and not have downtime. Plus security so some hacker in the stands can't buzz strike calls wirelessly to the umpire

    Unless some military technology could be used as "Strike Zone Goggles" showing a heads up display of the 3-D strike zone for this particular batter and indicating the real time flight path of the ball.

    Cylon Umpires! Or maybe the Borg is a better nerd-alogy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hallas View Post
    Google is doing research on glasses that do this. It might be civillian technology that makes this possible, not military.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57...en-nothin-yet/

  5. #140
    skanar is offline Plus Member Since 10/12 Major League Starter Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    April 26 vs Blue Jays
    Matusz: 5 squeezes, 4 gifts (-1)
    Hutchison: 2 squeezes, 4 gifts (+2)

    Game score: -3. Pretty average game with a slight Blue Jays bias.

    Edit: All of the gifts were on the outside corner, for both pitchers.
    Last edited by skanar; 04-26-2012 at 11:04 PM.

  6. #141
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NYC via Cambridge, MD
    Posts
    218
    I admit I didn't read this whole thread, but I wanted to mention something that I posted in the game thread. It seems to me that some of the umpires that get "low" into stances behind the place often have worse strike zones due to the angle that they're viewing from. Tonight's ump got low behind the catcher's left shoulder and he was calling more strikes to that side of the plate (and several inches off that side of the plate, in to righties and away to lefties). Meanwhile, he was calling a lot of balls to the other side of the plate, possibly because it's harder to see across the plate, with the angle as well as the catcher being in the way.

    Not sure if this is something that's been brought up or could be examined in any way....

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

OriolesHangout.com is an unofficial site and not associated with the Baltimore Orioles and part of Hangout Ventures LLC. Copyright ©2013 | Privacy Policy | Advertise with us