Jump to content

Eduardo A. Encina says the O's will dangle Tillman- Winter Meetings


wildcard

Recommended Posts

That is just wrong. If the O's want to contend in 2013 they don't have the depth of decent starting pitching to trade Tillman for a MOO bat. The only decent starters they have to open the season with are Hammel, Chen, Tillman and Gonzalez. If they would trade any of them it would have to be for better starting pitching IMO.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/bal-five-questions-for-orioles-baseball-winter-meetings-pictures-2012,0,4461079.photogallery

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That is just wrong. If the O's want to contend in 2013 they don't have the depth of decent starting pitching to trade Tillman for a MOO bat. The only decent starters they have to open the season with are Hammel, Chen, Tillman and Gonzalez. If they would trade any of them it would have to be for better starting pitching IMO.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/blog/bal-five-questions-for-orioles-baseball-winter-meetings-pictures-2012,0,4461079.photogallery

What say you?

Obviously it depends on the return. I wouldn't consider Tillman to be untouchable. If the Orioles believe that Bundy is a viable option for the Opening Day rotation and Gausman isn't too far behind, than they would probably be more comfortable moving Tillman for the right guy(s). It would be a risk but I think they would have to consider it if we are talking about someone like Butler or Hosmer coming back in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big concern with Tillman is that if he regresses, he is out of options so he would have to stay with the major league team and his stock would drop significantly faster then if he could be optioned to the minors. If you don't believe in Hammel or Gonzo, you can't really believe in Tillman until you see the results reproduced.

Besides, if you want a true impact bat, you have to give up quality, you aren't going to get it with spare parts like Arrieta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big concern with Tillman is that if he regresses, he is out of options so he would have to stay with the major league team and his stock would drop significantly faster then if he could be optioned to the minors.

If they have a valid reason to believe that Tillman will regress, then this concern should be addressed. However, if they make roster decisions based on fear of what might happen, they are setting themselves up for disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an extremely misleading title. In one of the article's 5 possibilities, which are clearly speculation, the writer says they MAY dangle Tillman or Matusz.
Here's the quote, bolded the relevant line:
Tillman, 24, made the most significant strides this past season, going 9-3 with a 2.93 ERA in 15 starts. And Matusz, 25, turned his season around when he moved to the bullpen (1.35 ERA, 2 ER, 5 H in 13 1/3 relief innings), becoming a shut-down left-handed reliever who could be used situationally or for extended use.

The club will look to dangle Tillman and Matusz more so than Arrieta and Britton, who the team feels still have significant upsides.

But the Orioles are confident other teams will be intrigued by all four at the winter meetings.

I don't see how the title is "extremely misleading".

Anyway, I don't mind them doing this. The connotation of "dangling" a player seems to be mostly saying that he's available and seeing how other teams value him. It doesn't seem like they'd be looking to move him just to move him, but if the right deal comes along, he's not untouchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the quote, bolded the relevant line:I don't see how the title is "extremely misleading".

Anyway, I don't mind them doing this. The connotation of "dangling" a player seems to be mostly saying that he's available and seeing how other teams value him. It doesn't seem like they'd be looking to move him just to move him, but if the right deal comes along, he's not untouchable.

The article is clearly speculation. It also mentions the possibility of signing a big FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article is clearly speculation. It also mentions the possibility of signing a big FA.
And how is the title misleading? It simply states that the article writer is saying the O's will dangle Tillman, which is what the writer stated in the article. Though I guess he said the O's would "look to dangle" instead of would "definitely dangle".
2. Will the Orioles go into Nashville willing to spend the money to sign a big-ticket free agent?

( McClatchy-Tribune / October 5, 2012 )

Not with the way the free-agent market is now.

The Orioles have watched as other teams spent frivolously, remaining content they haven?t lost out on much.

Despite the early rumors about Josh Hamilton, pictured, the Orioles remain uncomfortable with the years and money Hamilton commands, not to mention the inherent risk that comes from committing to a player who has had drug and alcohol addiction problems in the past.

If anything, the Orioles still see re-signing outfielder Nate McLouth, who was the team?s best player in the postseason, as a priority.

The longer he remains on the market, however, the more likely he will get a sizable deal elsewhere.

The club is also eyeing its options to add another starting pitcher, but not for more than a one-year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree! Tillman is at his highest value right now. I like him but was disappointed with him as most on here prior to last season. We can afford to trade him. NOW! For Butler or Dickey.

The only way I would consider that trade is if we got both of them. You don't trade a young TOR starter for either one of them alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...