+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 97
-
02-11-2013 10:20 PM #1
Norfolk
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 482
Michael Bourn signs with Cleveland 4 year 48 million
With an otion for 17' at 12 mill, I personally would of loved to seen the O's make a move for him. He signed way cheaper than what I thought he was holding out for, he would of been nice in center or left and a top lead off guy for our line-up. It would of also let us move Hardy down to a more natural spot in the line-up, something that Buck has been trying to do for awhile now . On a side note the Indians have had a nice off-season, Bourn, Reynolds,Swisher,Trevor Bauer, Drew Stubbs, and Brett Myers, they might give the Tigers some competition.This is what our line-up could of looked like with the addition of Bourn
CF/LF- Bourn
2B- Roberts
RF- Markakis
CF/LF - Jones
1B- Davis
C- Wieters
SS-Hardy
DH - Betemit/Reimold
3B-MachadoLast edited by OsnRavensallday; 02-11-2013 at 10:27 PM.
-
02-11-2013 10:31 PM #2
Note that it is an option that vests with 550 PA's in the fourth year, which is fairly attainable assuming health.
-
02-11-2013 10:34 PM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 873
Frustrating that Cleveland can be a major player in free agency but the O's can only sign McClouth.
Cleveland has some nice pieces
Reynolds 34HR, 95 RBI, .807 OPS (career averages) for 6 million
Swisher .830 career OPS
Bourn, statistically best defensive CF'er in baseball, 50 SB/year
Cabrera at SS
Starting pitching is still weak but they will score more runs than the O's
-
02-11-2013 10:49 PM #4
Very aggravating that they get Swisher and Bourn....and we don't get anyone.
-
02-11-2013 10:51 PM #5
Released
Released
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- DeBary, FL
- Posts
- 493
The years/money was reasonable, but you have to keep in mind that Cleveland also lost a first-round pick by signing Michael Bourn. Also, as nice as it would be to add Bourn to our outfield, I would want to send our franchise player (Adam Jones) the wrong message by signing another centerfielder right after he agreed to stay with us long term for less money. Jones would have easily got a $120+ million contract if he signed elsewhere.
-
02-11-2013 10:55 PM #6
-
02-11-2013 10:55 PM #7
With as little interest as there seemed to be on the market, I'm actually surprised he wound up with that much. That Boras, he does good work.
-
02-11-2013 11:03 PM #8
-
02-11-2013 11:05 PM #9
-
02-11-2013 11:12 PM #10
-
02-11-2013 11:22 PM #11
We have 4 good outfielders, Jones, Markakis, Reimold, and McLouth. Bourn has nowhere to play. Not much power, good OBP, but I prefer power. Pass and rightly so.
-
02-11-2013 11:28 PM #12
Hangout Blogger
Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Bethesda MD
- Posts
- 59,003
One of the costs of having a good season is that you lose a higher (first round) pick if you sign a top free agent. We haven't had that problem in a while.
I knew Bourn wouldn't get the ridiculous money some were suggesting. I think Cleveland did well with this deal.
-
02-11-2013 11:37 PM #13
Bowie
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Lutherville
- Posts
- 311
Don't fret O's fans. Ownership will invest in free agency when the MASN money starts rolling in. Strike that, I meant to say when the team is competitive. Wait, no, that's not right anymore, either. I meant to say when the time and market are right. That's the official company line, now, right?
-
02-11-2013 11:41 PM #14
Or when a player is a clear upgrade over what we have. I understand your frustration, but not when it comes to Michael Bourn. Bourn would not be worth 12 million a year as a left fielder and he and Jones would not be worth their combined salaries if Jones had to play left field. Also, potentially Nolan Reimold could outperform Bourn offensively this year.
-
02-11-2013 11:42 PM #15


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks