Jump to content

Brian Matusz tonight (3/13/13)


malkusm

Recommended Posts

4 IP, 0 H, 1 BB, 7 K (4 to righties, 3 to lefties)

5 groundouts (4 to righties, 1 to lefties)

0 flyouts

64 pitches (42 strikes, 22 balls)

Not bad against what was, for the most part, the Twins' Opening Day lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 IP, 0 H, 1 BB, 7 K (4 to righties, 3 to lefties)

5 groundouts (4 to righties, 1 to lefties)

0 flyouts

64 pitches (42 strikes, 22 balls)

Not bad against what was, for the most part, the Twins' Opening Day lineup.

Reports had him hitting 91 regularly. He was much more pitch efficient until his last two batters, issuing a walk to Willingham to foil the perfect line and then finally retiring Morneau on ground out after a 10 pitch AB.

Nice little outing and surely keeps him in the hunt for the 5th spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 IP, 0 H, 1 BB, 7 K (4 to righties, 3 to lefties)

5 groundouts (4 to righties, 1 to lefties)

0 flyouts

64 pitches (42 strikes, 22 balls)

Not bad against what was, for the most part, the Twins' Opening Day lineup.

The Righties would be Hicks, Willingham and Doumit. This is huge for Brian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The two most impressive things about Matusz' night were his pitch efficiency the first time through the order and his ability to get swings and misses from RHB. Both will be crucial in determining his future as a starter.

The only blemish was a somewhat shaky end to the outing, walking Willingham and issuing about 18 pitches to his final two batters. I'd like to know if this was more a function of tiring after being pushed the farthest yet this spring or of good ML hitters picking up on his stuff a bit more the second time around.

Either way, he pitched as well as one could have hoped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports had him hitting 91 regularly. He was much more pitch efficient until his last two batters, issuing a walk to Willingham to foil the perfect line and then finally retiring Morneau on ground out after a 10 pitch AB.

Nice little outing and surely keeps him in the hunt for the 5th spot.

Yep - I had him at 38 pitches through 3 innings. 26-pitch 4th inning, but most of that was after he recorded the first 2 outs quickly. I think probably 8 pitches to Willingham (who walked on a borderline 3-2 pitch) and 10 to Morneau, who fouled off 5 pitches in the AB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked Matusz as the guy to land the 5th spot in the rotation in the poll a few weeks ago. Boy he looked the part tonight. I'd love to see the mix of pitches. Largely how his change up looked. If he was striking guys out at 91 my guess is that he may have rediscovered it. Regardless it's nice to have a little good news today. way to go Brian!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 IP, 0 H, 1 BB, 7 K (4 to righties, 3 to lefties)

5 groundouts (4 to righties, 1 to lefties)

0 flyouts

64 pitches (42 strikes, 22 balls)

Not bad against what was, for the most part, the Twins' Opening Day lineup.

Great thread. :) These numbers are so good, they need to be in lights, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have high hopes for Matusz. I truly feel like sending him to the bullpen this year is selling him short. He is young, left handed, and has had stretches of dominant pitching. If he needs time in Norfolk then he should be given time in Norfolk as a starter and not thrown in the pen as a lefty specialist, no matter how effective he is against right handers.

I'm really happy to see such a good outing. Though, the Twins lineup looks even weaker than a lot of the Orioles lineups 2000-2011 so I can't get carried away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports had him hitting 91 regularly. He was much more pitch efficient until his last two batters, issuing a walk to Willingham to foil the perfect line and then finally retiring Morneau on ground out after a 10 pitch AB.

Nice little outing and surely keeps him in the hunt for the 5th spot.

Good for him and for the O's. But I still rather have in the BP. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for him and for the O's. But I still rather have in the BP. IMO

Me too... unless he consistently does this start after start. At that point, you have to admit you'd want that type of performance in the rotation. But like RZ said... it's ALL about consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Personally I take rushed to mean something a bit milder. I think you're using the word more absolutely than many do, and that's the disagreement.  I would call a player rushed if they were brought up before they were ready to perform, and it damaged or delayed their development. Particularly if there was reason to doubt their readiness before the callup. But it doesn't have to be something that ruins them or that they never recover from for me to be willing to call it rushing.  Now I'm not sure they rushed Holliday under either definition, since there was tons of evidence supporting the idea of bringing him up. 
    • IMHO defensive prowess at premium positions generally benefits your pitchers to a more significant degree than offensive prowess. So C, CF, SS, 2B are positions that I would be OK with one or two players who profile +10 D/-10 O. I think the corners, (LF, RF, 3B and 1B) are where you can have one or two +10 O/-10 D types. 3B tends to be a corner spot where a stellar defender can change the course of a game or series, however.  I also believe that defensive skill is more highly correlated with superb athleticism; whereas offensive skills are less highly correlated with athleticism.  In other words, it's rare to see a great defender who is not a great athlete; but there are many excellent hitters who are not very athletic.  I think the O's like players who can defend at a very high level. I think they like exceptional athletes who are versatile defensively. They have been fortunate that many of their prospects are superb on both sides of the ball.   
    • Boring answer but I’m going with the average hitter, average defender. Everyone loves a great hitter but just wait til they have a DJ Stewart bonk on the head moment time after time and the offense won’t seem so great. On the other hand, Izturis was cool to have on the team until he came up to bat.    Give me someone who will make most of the plays and won’t kill you at the plate. 
    • He wasn’t rushed because the org and everyone who saw him felt he was ready. He’s mature, he’s confident and has dominated the minors. So, unless you want to ignore all of that, I don’t see any logical argument that he was rushed.
    • I think he gets more games. They gave Cowser 77 PA last season, Holliday isn't halfway there yet.
    • When people say a player was rushed, it usually  means the player has no chance to compete, is in over their heads, confident shot to hell and may not recover. What you are saying isn’t that.  You are saying they could use more seasoning iyo. Again, this may be semantics but rushed is usually a negative connotation that comes with ruining a players career.     So no, I don’t think that exists unless it’s an example like I said.,going from HS to the majors or something over the top like that..which doesn’t happen.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...